Digital inspirational economy: the dialectics of design

References

• Adobe. (2012, December 20). Bēhance acquisition FAQ. Adobe. Retrieved from https://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201212/122012AdobeAcquiresBehance.html
   Google Scholar
• Alexa. (2017, July). Alexa site rank: Bēhance, similar sites. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/find-similar-sites#site=behance.net
   Google Scholar
• Alexa. (2018a, October 31). Site overview Bēhance. Retrieved from https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/behance.net
   Google Scholar
• Alexa. (2018b, October 31). Site overview dribbble. Retrieved from https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/dribbble.com#?sites=dribbble.com
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. (2015). Connect with your audience! The relational labor of connection. The Communication Review, 18(1), 14–22. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2015.996401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. (2018). Playing to the crowd: Musicians, audiences, and the intimate work of connection. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1982/2008). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belsky, S. (2012, December 24). Why did Adobe acquire Behance? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2012/12/24/why-did-adobe-acquire-behance/#a581fd32ec9f
   Google Scholar
• Bēhance. (2017a). About Bēhance. Retrieved from https://www.Bēhance.net/about
   Google Scholar
• Bēhance. (2017b). Bēhance year in review. Retrieved from https://www.behance.net/yearinreview/our-community
   Google Scholar
• Bierut, M. (2006). Designing under the influence. In M. Bierut, W. Drenttel, & S. Heller (Eds.), Looking closer 5 (pp. 179–194). New York: Allworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. (Ed.). (1994). Dimensions of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010, January). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. System sciences(hicss), 43rd Hawaii international conference, Honolulu, HI (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi: 10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(8), 081004. doi: 10.1115/1.4004396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 347–365). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (1997). The theory of inspiration: Composition as a crisis of subjectivity in romantic and post-romantic writing. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conor, B., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (2015). Gender and creative labour. The Sociological Review, 63(S1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L. (2017). Curation: A theoretical treatment. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 770–783. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Designspiration. (2017). Designspiration sign up. Retrieved from https://www.designspiration.net/
   Google Scholar
• Dribbble. (2018). Dribbble 2018 Year in review. Retrieved from https://dribbble.com/year/2018/
   Google Scholar
• Dribbble. (2019a). Dribbble community guidelines code of conduct. Retrieved from https://dribbble.com/guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Dribbble. (2019b). Players & prospects. Retrieved from https://help.dribbble.com/#players--prospects
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. E. (2015). Link love and comment karma: Norms and politics of evaluation in the fashion blogosphere. In H. Suhr (Ed.), Online evaluation of creativity and the arts (pp. 41–59). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Design Studies, 21(5), 523–538. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00022-3
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. G. (2018, December 12). The case for viral callout culture. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/viral-call-out-culture/
   Google Scholar
• Fu, K., Chan, J., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K., Schunn, C., & Wood, K. (2013). The meaning of “near” and “far”: The impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(2), 021007-1–021007-12. doi: 10.1115/1.4023158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2016a). Digital work: Self-branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 123–141. doi: 10.1177/1470593115607942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2016b). The reputation economy: Understanding knowledge work in digital society. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). # Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255–268. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2010). Life is a pitch: Managing the self in new media work. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work (pp. 249–262). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8), 1–30. doi: 10.1177/0263276408097794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (1998). Creative architectural design: Reference versus precedence. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 15(3), 258–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. (2016). Decoding designers’ inspiration process (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delft: Delft University of Technology (TU Delft).
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2016). Inspiration choices that matter: The selection of external stimuli during ideation. Design Science, 2(E10), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, R. E. (1940). An anatomy of inspiration. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, A. (2010). Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital ‘reputation’ economy. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(3/4), 421–438.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, J., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2018). Dribbble: Exploring the concept of viral events on an art world social network site. In G. Chowdhury, J. McLeod, V. Gillet, & P. Willett (Eds.), Transforming Digital Worlds. iConference 2018, Sheffield, UK, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Vol. 10766, pp. 27–36). Springer. Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. R., Jones, B. R., & Bailey, B. P. (2009, January). Idea generation techniques among creative professionals. System sciences, 2009. HICSS’09. 42nd Hawaii international conference, Big Island, HI (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hische, J. (n.d.). How do you deal with style rip-off-ers? [blog post]. Retrieved from http://jessicahische.is/advisingyou-part3
   Google Scholar
• Howkins, J. (2002). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. (2017). Economies of design. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, A. I., Pasman, G. J., & Stappers, P. J. (2006). Collections designers keep: Collecting visual material for inspiration and reference. CoDesign, 2(01), 17–33. doi: 10.1080/15710880600571123
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N. W. (2017). Creative community demystified: A statistical overview of Behance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00800.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler, G. (1962). The shape of time: Remarks on the history of things (Vol. 140). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehn, K., & Corrigan, T. F. (2013). Hope labor: The role of employment prospects in online social production. The Political Economy of Communication, 1(1), 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know. Oxford [England]: Elsevier/Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. K. (2017). The political economy of ‘creative industries’. Media, Culture & Society, 39(7), 1078–1088. doi: 10.1177/0163443717692739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (1998). British fashion design: Rag trade or image industry?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 516–531. doi: 10.1080/09502380210139098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monroy-Hernández, A., Hill, B. M., Gonzalez-Rivero, J., & boyd, d. (2011, May). Computers can't give credit: How automatic attribution falls short in an online remixing community. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12, May, pp.3421-3440. ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, M. (2018, September 4). Design Debate: Is there such thing as too much inspiration? Adobe 99u. Retrieved from https://99u.adobe.com/articles/59641/design-debate-is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-inspiration
   Google Scholar
• Mougenot, C., Bouchard, C., Aoussat, A., & Westerman, S. (2008). Inspiration, images and design: An investigation of designers’ information gathering strategies. Journal of Design Research, 7(4), 331–351. doi: 10.1504/JDR.2008.026987
   Google Scholar
• Muzli. (2019). Designers secret source. Retrieved from https://muz.li/
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, L. (2015). The unwanted labour of social media: Women of colour call out culture as venture community management. New Formations, 86(86), 106–112. doi: 10.3898/NEWF.86.06.2015
   Google Scholar
• Neff, G. (2012). Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk in innovative industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, G., Wissinger, E., & Zukin, S. (2005). Entrepreneurial labor among cultural producers: “Cool” jobs in “hot” industries. Social Semiotics, 15(3), 307–334. doi: 10.1080/10350330500310111
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, S. (2006). The pursuit of newness: Advertising, creativity and the ‘narcissism of minor differences’. Cultural Studies, 20(1), 89–106. doi: 10.1080/09502380500494877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashkow, M. (2005). Inspirability: 40 top designers speak out about what inspires. Cincinnati, OH: HOW Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2018). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkel, D. (2016). Share wars: Sharing, theft, and the everyday production of web 2.0 on DeviantArt. First Monday, 21(6), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, A. C. (2002). Hot jobs in cool places. The material cultures of new media product spaces: The case of the south of market, San Francisco. Information, Communication and Society, 5(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1080/13691180110117640
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2003). No-collar: The humane workplace and its hidden costs. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scolere, L. (2019). Brand yourself, design your future: Portfolio-building in the social media age. New Media & Society, 21(9), 1891–1909. doi: 10.1177/1461444819833066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolere, L., & Humphreys, L. (2016). Pinning design: The curatorial labor of creative professionals. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/2056305116633481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolere, L., Pruchniewska, U., & Duffy, B. E. (2018). Constructing the platform-specific self-brand: The labor of social media promotion. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1–11. doi: 10.1177/2056305118784768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnreich, A. (2010). Mashed up: Music, technology, and the rise of configurable culture. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Littleton, K. (2012). Contemporary identities of creativity and creative work. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Rahman, G. (2008). Parallel practices and the dialectics of open creative production. Journal of Design History, 21(4), 371–386. doi: 10.1093/jdh/epn034
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. doi: 10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• Visual News. (2017). Get inspiration in your inbox newsletter signup. Retrieved from https://www.visualnews.com/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., & Ilhan, A. O. (2009). Holding creativity together: A sociological theory of the design professions. Design Issues, 25(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Not Working. (2019, March 25). A dozen illustrators talk about the future: Dream projects & industry upgrades on the horizon. Working Not Working Magazine. Retrieved from https://magazine.workingnotworking.com/magazine/2019/3/21/11-illustrators-talk-about-the-future?rq=ruby%20roth
   Google Scholar
• Youmans, R. J., & Arciszewski, T. (2014). Design fixation: A cloak of many colors. In Design computing and cognition'12 (pp. 115–129). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N.B. (2016, May). The social media ecology: user perceptions, strategies, and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 7-12 May, pp.89-100. ACM Press.
   Google Scholar