1,160
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

#Opinionleaders: a comparison of self-reported and observable influence of Twitter users

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1533-1550 | Received 14 Sep 2017, Accepted 10 Dec 2019, Published online: 01 Jan 2020

References

  • Araujo, T., Neijens, P., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Getting the word out on Twitter: The role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands. International Journal of Advertising, 36, 496–513. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2016.1173765
  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Bennett, W. L., & Manheim, J. B. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608, 213–232. doi: 10.1177/0002716206292266
  • Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 24–48. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113–120. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
  • Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29, 555–564. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002
  • Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae [NEO-FFI scale based on Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
  • Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., Andrews, K. R., & Serota, K. (2011). Identifying influence: Development and validation of the connectivity, persuasiveness, and maven scales. Journal of Communication, 61, 178–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01531.x
  • Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P. K. (2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 10–17.
  • Choi, S. (2015). The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33, 696–711. doi: 10.1177/0894439314556599
  • Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on twitter. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
  • Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J., & Neuberger, C. (2013). An investigation of influentials and the role of sentiment in political communication on Twitter during election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 795–825. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608
  • Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: Identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1260–1277. doi: 10.1177/0002764214527088
  • Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35–41. doi: 10.2307/3033543
  • Garrett, R. K. (2017). On retiring concepts. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 105–110. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288553
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2014). Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society, 16, 488–506. doi: 10.1177/1461444813487960
  • Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2011). Evaluation of measurement precision with Rasch-type models: The case of the short Generalized Opinion Leadership Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.021
  • Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2012). A personality-competence model of opinion leadership. Psychology and Marketing, 29, 606–621. doi: 10.1002/mar.20547
  • Golan, G. J., & Day, A. G. (2008). The first-person effect and its behavioral consequences: A new trend in the twenty-five year history of third-person effect research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 539–556. doi: 10.1080/15205430802368621
  • Hölig, S. (2018): Eine meinungsstarke Minderheit als Stimmungsbarometer?! Über die Persönlichkeitseigenschaften aktiver Twitterer [An assertive minority as barometer of public opinion? On the personality characteristics of active Twitter users]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 66, 140–169. doi: 10.5771/1615-634X-2018-2-140
  • Huang, R., & Sun, X. (2014). Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 86–104. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.853817
  • Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 61–78. doi: 10.1086/266687
  • Katz, E., & Fialkoff, Y. (2017). Six concepts in search of retirement. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 86–91. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1291280
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Kim, E., Scheufele, D. A., Han, J., & Shah, D. (2017). Opinion leaders in online cancer support groups: An investigation of their antecedents and consequences. Health Communication, 32, 142–151. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1110005
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
  • Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1983). Persönlichkeitsstärke [Personality strength]. Hamburg, Germany: Der Spiegel.
  • Otto, L., & Bacherle, P. (2011). Politisches Interesse Kurzskala (PIKS) – Entwicklung und Validierung [Short scale political interest – Development and validation]. Politische Psychologie, 1, 19–35.
  • Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1641–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044
  • Robinson, J. P. (1976). Interpersonal influence in election campaigns: Two step-flow hypotheses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 304–319. doi: 10.1086/268307
  • Rogers, E. M., & Cartano, D. G. (1962). Methods of measuring opinion leadership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 435–441. doi: 10.1086/267118
  • Schäfer, M. S., & Taddicken, M. (2015). Mediatized opinion leaders: New patterns of opinion leadership in new media environments? International Journal of Communication, 9, 960–981. doi:1932–8036/20150005
  • Schenk, M., & Rössler, P. (1997). The rediscovery of opinion leaders: An application of the personality strength scale. Communications, 22, 5–30. doi: 10.1515/comm.1997.22.1.5
  • Shah, D. V., & Scheufele, D. A. (2006). Explicating opinion leadership: Nonpolitical dispositions, information consumption, and civic participation. Political Communication, 23, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/10584600500476932
  • Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015). User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 798–815. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268
  • Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 217–248. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
  • Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 520–535. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12127
  • Varnali, K., & Gorgulu, V. (2015). A social influence perspective on expressive political participation in Twitter: The case of #OccupyGezi. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.923480
  • Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
  • Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 214–239. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv050
  • Weimann, G. (1982). On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication. American Sociological Review, 47, 764–773. doi: 10.2307/2095212
  • Weimann, G. (1991). The influentials: Back to the concept of opinion leaders? Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 267–279. doi: 10.1086/269257
  • Winter, S., & Neubaum, G. (2016). Examining characteristics of opinion leaders in social media: A motivational approach. Social Media + Society, 2. doi: 10.1177/2056305116665858
  • Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Who says what to whom on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web (pp. 705–714). ACM.
  • Xu, W. W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S., & Park, H. W. (2014). Predicting opinion leaders in Twitter activism networks: The case of the Wisconsin recall election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1278–1293. doi: 10.1177/0002764214527091

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.