Advanced search
Publication Cover
Information, Communication & Society Volume 24, 2021 - Issue 11
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,808
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A next step for territorial copyright licenses for on-demand audio-visual services in the light of the EU Digital Single Market

Miriam Ettela Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University School of Economics (U.S.E.), Utrecht, NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Paul W. J. de Bijla Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University School of Economics (U.S.E.), Utrecht, Netherlands;b Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC), Tilburg University, Tilburg, NetherlandsView further author information
Pages 1551-1567 | Received 23 Nov 2018, Accepted 10 Dec 2019, Published online: 25 Dec 2019

References

Literature

  • Alaveras, G., Gómez, E., & Martens, B. (2017). Geo-blocking of non-audio-visual digital media content in the EU Digital Single Market. (Working Paper). JRC Digital Economy. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2983793
  • Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2018). Some simple economics of the blockchain. (NBER Working Paper). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22952
  • Chalaby, J. K. (2016). Television and globalization: The TV content global value chain. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 35–59. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12203
  • Creative Commons. (2016). What we do – What is creative commons? Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/
  • Earle, S. (2016). The battle against geo-blocking: The consumer strikes back. Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business, 15(1), 1–73.
  • Euroclear. (2012). International securities operational market practice book. Retrieved from https://www.euroclear.com/dam/Brochures/MA1521_ISMAG_MPB_2012.pdf
  • European Commission. (2005). Recommendation of 18 May 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2005/737/oj
  • European Commission. (2015). A Digital Single Market strategy for Europe. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/eu-internal-market-subcommittee/Digital-Single-Market/COM-2015-192-final-digital-single-market-strategy.pdf
  • Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2010). Is there a market for ideas? Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 805–837. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq023
  • Geradin, D. (2017). Is mandatory access to the postal network desirable and if so at what terms? (Discussion Paper). Tilburg Law & Economics Center (TILEC).
  • Grece, C., Lange, A., Schneeberger, A., & Valais, S. (2015). The development of the European market for on-demand audiovisual services. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
  • Haunss, S. (2013). The changing role of collecting societies in the internet. Internet Policy Review, 2, 1–8.
  • Hoffman, J. (2016). Crossing borders in the digital market: A proposal to end copyright territoriality and geo-blocking in the European Union. The George Washington International Law Review, 49, 143–173.
  • Ibáñez Colomo, P. (2017). Copyright licensing and the EU Digital Single Market strategy. In R. D. Blair & D. D. Sokol (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of antitrust, intellectual property, and high tech (pp. 339–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones, A., & Sufrin, B. (2016). EU competition law: Text, cases, and materials. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (2000). Competition in telecommunications. London: MIT Press.
  • Langus, G., Neven, D., & Poukens, S. (2014). Economic analysis of the territoriality of the making available right in the EU. Brussels: Charles River Associates Study for the European Commission.
  • Langus, G., Neven, D., & Shier, G. (2013). Assessing the economic impacts of adapting certain limitations and exceptions to copyright and related rights in the EU. Brussels: Charles River Associates Study for the European Commission.
  • Maciejewski, M., Fischer, N. I. C., & Roginska, Y. (2014). Streaming and online access to content and services. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • Mazziotti, G. (2015). Is geo-blocking a real cause for concern in Europe? (Working Paper). Florence: European University Institute.
  • Meurer, M. J. (2002). Vertical restraints and intellectual property law: Beyond antitrust. Minnesota Law Review, 87, 1871–1912.
  • Peters, G. W., & Panayi, E. (2016). Understanding modern banking ledgers through blockchain technologies: Future of transaction processing and smart contracts on the internet of money. In P. Tasca, T. Aste, L. Pelizzon, & N. Perony (Eds.), Banking beyond banks and money (pp. 239–278). Cham: Springer.
  • Picard, R. G., & Siciliani, P. (2013). Is there still a place for public service television? Effects of the changing economics of broadcasting. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
  • Pirrong, C. (2011). The economics of central clearing: Theory and practice. New York: International Swaps and Derivatives Association.
  • Plum Consulting. (2012). The economic potential of cross-border pay-to-view and listen audiovisual media services. Retrieved from https://plumconsulting.co.uk/economic-potential-cross-border-pay-view-and-listen-audiovisual-media-services/
  • Poiares Maduro, M., Monti, G., & Coelho, G. (2017). The geo-blocking proposal: Internal market, competition law and regulatory aspects. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • Roth, A. E. (2007). The art of designing markets. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 118ff.
  • Savelyev, A. (2018). Copyright in the blockchain era: Promises and challenges. Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice, 34(3), 550–561. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.11.008
  • Schrepel, T. (2018). Is blockchain the death of antitrust law? The blockchain antitrust paradox. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3193576
  • Schroff, S., & Street, J. (2018). The politics of the Digital Single Market: Culture vs. competition vs. copyright. Information, Communication & Society, 21, 1305–1321. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1309445
  • Sherman, R., & Waterman, D. (2016). The economics of online video entertainment. In J. M. Bauer & M. Latzer (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of the internet (pp. 458–474). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Simonelli, F. (2016). Combating consumer discrimination in the Digital Single Market: Preventing geo-blocking and other forms of geo-discrimination. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • Van Overwalle, G. (2016). Patent pools and clearinghouses in the life sciences: Back to the future. In D. Matthews & H. Zech (Eds.), Research handbook on IP and the life sciences (pp. 304–336). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Weiss, C. A. (2016). Available to all, produced by few: The economic and cultural impact of Europe’s Digital Single Market strategy within the audio-visual industry. Columbia Business Law Review, 3, 877–923.
  • Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2016). The economics of copyright and the internet: Moving to an empirical assessment relevant in the digital age. In J. M. Bauer & M. Latzer (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of the internet (pp. 229–246). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Case law

  • Joined Cases-403/08 and C-429/08, Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others; Karen Murphy vs Media Protection Services Ltd (2008).

Legislation

  • Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive).
  • Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights and Multi-Territorial Licensing of Rights in Musical Works for Online Use in the Internal Market (Directive on Collective Management of Copyright).
  • Proposal (2016/0280) for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (Copyright Proposal).
  • Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the Application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to Categories of Vertical Agreements and Concerted Practices (Block Exemption Regulation).
  • Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories (European Market Infrastructure Regulation).
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/1128 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on Cross-Border Portability of Online Content Services in the Internal Market (Portability Regulation).
  • Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on Addressing Unjustified Geo-Blocking and Other Forms of Discrimination Based on Customers’ Nationality, Place of Residence or Place of Establishment Within the Internal Market and Amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Geo-Blocking Regulation).
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.