The written and unwritten rules of internet exclusion: inequality, institutions and network disadvantage in cities of the Global South

References

• Alcaldía de Medellín. (2015). Encuesta de Calidad de Vida. Medellín: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Aranda, G., & Salinas, S. (2015). Alba y Alianza del Pacífico: ‘Choque de integraciones’. Universum (Talca), 30(1), 17–38. doi: 10.4067/S0718-23762015000100002
   Google Scholar
• Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, J. M. (2018). The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society. Telecommunications Policy, 42(4), 333–343. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán, F. (2014). Fibre-to-the-home, high-speed and national broadband plans: Tales from down under. Telecommunications Policy, 38(8–9), 715–729. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F. (2016). International housing policy for the urban poor and the informal city in the Global South: A non-diachronic review. Journal of International Development, 28(5), 788–807. doi: 10.1002/jid.3204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, L., Reisdorf, B. C., & Dutton, W. H. (2019). Urban internet myths and realities: A Detroit case study. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1622764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2009). The role of income inequality in a multivariate cross-national analysis of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1177/0894439308321628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Canclini, N. (2019). A culture of informality. Urban Studies, 56(3), 488–493. doi: 10.1177/0042098018782635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. (2017). Broadband penetration and economic growth: Do policies matter? Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 676–693. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. (2002). Power, ideology and the Washington consensus: The development and spread of Chilean housing policy. Housing Studies, 17(2), 305–324. doi: 10.1080/02673030220123243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A. (2012). De Soto’s The Mystery of capital: Reflections on the book’s public impact. International Development Planning Review, 34(3), v–xviii. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2012.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, T. (2018). Seeing political settlements through the city: A framework for comparative analysis of urban transformation. Development and Change, 49(1), 199–222. doi: 10.1111/dech.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2002). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, G. J., & Yates, D. J. (2012). Different paths to universal access: The impact of policy and regulation on broadband diffusion in the developed and developing worlds. Telecommunications Policy, 36(9), 749–761. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2012.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haucap, J., Heimeshoff, U., & Lange, M. R. (2016). The impact of tariff diversity on broadband penetration – an empirical analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 40(8), 743–754. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a ‘digital underclass’ in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media and Society, 19(8), 1253–1270. doi: 10.1177/1461444816634676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joskow, P. L. (2009). Deregulation: Where do we go from here? Washington: AEI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., Savitch, H. V., & Haddock, S. V. (1997). The political economy of urban regimes. Urban Affairs Review, 32(3), 348–377. doi: 10.1177/107808749703200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. (2010). Political settlements and the governance of growth-enhancing institutions. London: SOAS.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, K. (2015). Social urbanism and the politics of violence. London: Springer. doi: 10.1057/9781137397362
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V. (2006). The digital divide. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 176–199. doi: 10.1177/0010414005282983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. (2015). Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Neckerman, K. M., & Torche, F. (2007). Inequality: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 335–357. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neokosmidis, I., Avaritsiotis, N., Ventoura, Z., & Varoutas, D. (2015). Assessment of the gap and (non-) Internet user’s evolution based on population biology dynamics. Telecommunications Policy, 39(1), 14–37. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, J. G. (2011). Homogeneous middles vs. heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘inverted-U’: It’s all about the share of the rich. Development and Change, 42(1), 87–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2017). Somewhat separate and unequal: Digital divides, social networking sites, and capital-enhancing activities. Social Media + Society, 3(2). doi:10.1177/2056305117716272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Weber, J. E. (2018). Desarrollo y desigualdad en Chile (1850-2009). Historia de su economía política. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Tagle, J., & López, E. (2014). El estudio de la segregación residencial en Santiago de Chile: revisión crítica de algunos problemas metodológicos y conceptuales. EURE (Santiago), 40(119), 25–48. doi: 10.4067/S0250-71612014000100002
   Google Scholar
• Stier, S. (2017). Internet diffusion and regime type: Temporal patterns in technology adoption. Telecommunications Policy, 41(1), 25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015a). The third level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, & J. Schulz (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (Studies in Media and Communications; Vol. 9) (pp. 29–52). Emerald Group. doi: 10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015b). Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society, 31(5), 379–391. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walks, A. (2018). Driving the poor into debt? Automobile loans, transport disadvantage, and automobile dependence. Transport Policy, 65, 137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar