References
- Adel, T., Ghahramani, Z., & Weller, A. (2018). Discovering interpretable representations for both deep generative and discriminative models. 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden, 10-15 July 2018.
- Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
- Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2018). Fairness and machine learning. Limitations and opportunities (DRAFT). https://fairmlbook.org/
- Bellovin, S. M., Dutta, P. K., & Reitinger, N. (2019). Privacy and synthetic datasets. Stanford Technology Law Review, 22, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/bfqh3.
- Boorstin, D. J. (1992, 27–30 January). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. Vintage.
- Borges, J. L. (1998). The library of Babel (A. Hurley, Trans. Collected Fictions.) (pp. 112-118). Penguin.
- Castelle, M. (2020, 27–30 January). The social lives of generative adversarial networks. Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*’20), Barcelona, Spain, https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3373156.
- Castelvecchi, D. (2017). Astronomers explore uses for AI-generated images. Neural networks produce pictures to train image-recognition programs and scientific software. Nature. https://www.nature.com/news/astronomers-explore-uses-for-ai-generated-images-1.21398
- Chen, A. (2019). Can an AI be an inventor? Not yet. But some campaigners are pushing for the rules to change. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/615020/ai-inventor-patent-dabus-intellectual-property-uk-european-patent-office-law/?utm_source=newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the_algorithm.unpaid.engagement#gid=559908609
- Chen, X., Duan, Y., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., Sutskever, I., & Abbeel, P. (2016). Infogan: Interpretable representation learning by information maximizing generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems. arXiv:1606.0365.
- Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2018). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. [draft paper available at SSRN, version July 14, 2018]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954
- Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2015). Peering into transparency: Challenging ideals, proxies, and organizational practices. Communication Theory, 25(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12052
- Craig, C. J., & Kerr, I. R. (2019). The death of the AI author. Available at SSRN 3374951.
- Culkin, J. M. (1967). A schoolman’s guide to Marshall McLuhan. The Saturday Review, 51-53, 70–72. http://www.unz.org/Pub/SaturdayRev-1967mar18-00051
- Despois, J. (2017). Latent space visualization — Deep Learning bits #2. Hackernoon. https://hackernoon.com/latent-space-visualization-deep-learning-bits-2-bd09a46920df
- De Vries, K. (2013). Privacy, due process and the computational turn. A parable and a first analysis. In M. Hildebrandt, & K. De Vries (Eds.), Privacy, due process and the computational turn. The philosophy of law meets the philosophy of technology (pp. 9–38). Routledge.
- De Vries, K. (2016). Machine learning/informational fundamental rights. Makings of sameness and difference. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
- Donahue, J., Krähenbühl, P., & Darrell, T. (2016). Adversarial feature learning. arXiv:1605.09782.
- Dutch Digital Design. (2018). The next Rembrandt: Bringing the old master back to life. Case study: Behind the scenes of digital design. Medium. https://medium.com/@DutchDigital/the-next-rembrandt-bringing-the-old-master-back-to-life-35dfb1653597.
- Edelman, G. (2020). Facebook’s deepfake ban is a solution to a distant problem. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-deepfake-ban-disinformation/
- European Commission. (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Building Trust in Human Centric Artificial Intelligence (COM(2019)168).
- European Economic and Social Committee. (2017). Artificial intelligence: Europe needs to take a human-in-command approach, says EESC. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/news-media/press-releases/artificial-intelligence-europe-needs-take-human-command-approach-says-eesc
- European Parliamentary Research Service. (2019). A governance framework for algorithmic accountability and transparency. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/624262/EPRS_STU(2019)624262_EN.pdf
- Foucart, S. (2011, February 14). “Juif" - Une requête très française. Le Monde.
- Ghahramani, A. (2019). Why this person does not exist (and its copycats) need to be restricted. Venture Beat. https://venturebeat.com/2019/03/03/why-thispersondoesnotexist-and-its-copycats-need-to-be-restricted/
- Giles, M. (2018, February 21). The GANfather: The man who’s given machines the gift of imagination. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610253/the-ganfather-the-man-whos-given-machines-the-gift-of-imagination/
- Gitelman, L., & Rosenberg, D. (2013). “Raw data” is an Oxymoron. MIT Press.
- Goodfellow, I. (2016). Generative adversarial networks. Pros and cons. What is the advantage of generative adversarial networks compared with other generative models? Quora. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-advantage-of-generative-adversarial-networks-compared-with-other-generative-models
- Goodfellow, I., Papernot, N., Huang, S., Duan, Y., Abbeel, P., & Clark, J. (2017). Attacking machine learning with adversarial examples Open AI. https://blog.openai.com/adversarial-example-research/
- Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems.
- Green, B., & Hu, L. (2018, 10-15 July). The myth in the methodology: Towards a recontextualization of fairness in machine learning. 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method. University of Nebraska Press.
- Gurses, S., Overdorf, R., & Balsa, E. (2018). POTs: The revolution will not be optimized? 11th Hot Topics in Privacy Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs 2018), Barcelona, Spain.
- Harwell, D. (2019). An artificial-intelligence first: Voice-mimicking software reportedly used in a major theft. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/09/04/an-artificial-intelligence-first-voice-mimicking-software-reportedly-used-major-theft/
- Hernandez, J. (2018). Making AI interpretable with generative adversarial networks. Medium. https://medium.com/square-corner-blog/making-ai-interpretable-with-generative-adversarial-networks-766abc953edf
- Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Forbes, M., & Choi, Y. (2019). The curious case of neural text degeneration. arXiv: 1904.09751.
- Jebara, T. (2012). Machine learning: Discriminative and generative. Springer.
- Jordon, J., Yoon, J., & van der Schaar, M. (2018). PATE-GAN: Generating synthetic data with differential privacy guarantees.
- Karras, Tero, Laine, Samuli, & Aila, Timo. (2019). A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 4401–4410. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00453.
- Kaufmann, M. (2019). Who connects the dots? Agents and agency in predictive policing. In M. Hoijtink, & M. Leese (Eds.), Technology and agency in international relations (pp. 141–163). Routledge.
- Kaur, H., Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Caruana, R., Wallach, H., & Vaughan, J. W. (2019). Interpreting interpretability: Understanding data scientists’ use of interpretability tools for machine learning. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2020), April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. http://www.jennwv.com/papers/interp-ds.pdf.
- Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv:1312.6114.
- Klingemann, M. (2020). Neurography. Computers, privacy and data protection (CPDP) 2020, Brussels, Belgium.
- Kriegman, S., Blackiston, D., Levin, M., & Bongard, J. (2020). A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 1853–1859. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910837117
- Larsson, S. (2017). Conceptions in the code: How metaphors explain legal challenges in digital times. Oxford University Press.
- Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Lohr, S. (2014). For big-data scientists, ‘Janitor Work’ Is Key Hurdle to Insights. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/technology/for-big-data-scientists-hurdle-to-insights-is-janitor-work.html
- Mahadevan, S. (2018, 2-7 February). Imagination machines: A new challenge for artificial intelligence. AAAI Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d3c6/4b2497fb02d496709c4fa8fff00f4581399c.pdf?_ga=2.98735515.469762207.1558014984-957934482.1558014984.
- Miller, A. I. (2019). The artist in the machine. The world of AI-Powered creativity. MIT Press.
- Mizrahi, S. K. (2019, April 11-13). Jack of all trades, master of none: Is copyright protection justified for robotic faux-riginality? We Robot, Miami. https://robots.law.miami.edu/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SaritKMizrahi_WeRobot_Article.pdf
- Nguyen, A., Dosovitskiy, A., Yosinski, J., Brox, T., & Clune, J. (2016). Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networks. x, arXiv:1605.09304.
- Nissenbaum, H., & Brunton, F. (2015). Obfuscation: A user’s guide for privacy and protest. MIT Press.
- Paez, D. (2019). ‘This person does not exist’ Creator Reveals His Site’s Creepy Origin Story. Inverse. https://www.inverse.com/article/53414-this-person-does-not-exist-creator-interview
- Postman, N. (2011). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage.
- Powles, J. (2018). The seductive diversion of ‘solving’ bias in artificial intelligence. OneZero. https://onezero.medium.com/the-seductive-diversion-of-solving-bias-in-artificial-intelligence-890df5e5ef53
- Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015). Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1511.06434.
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. J. O. B. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. 1, 8.
- Samuel, A. L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.33.0210
- Samuel, S. (2019). It’s disturbingly easy to trick AI into doing something deadly. Vox. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/4/8/18297410/ai-tesla-self-driving-cars-adversarial-machine-learning
- Sattigeri, P., Hoffman, S. C., Chenthamarakshan, V., & Varshney, K. R. (2018). Fairness gan. arXiv:1805.09910.
- Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019, 29-31 January). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Atlanta, GA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3287560.3287598.
- Sicardi, A. (2018). Do androids dream Of Balenciaga SS29? Robbie Barrat imagines a future in which the creative director is a computer. SSENSE. https://www.ssense.com/en-se/editorial/fashion/do-androids-dream-of-balenciaga-ss29?utm_term=collabshare
- Simonite, T. (2019). Forget politics. For now, deepfakes are for bullies. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/forget-politics-deepfakes-bullies/
- Sontag, S. (2005). On photography. RosettaBooks LLC.
- Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013). Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv:1312.6199.
- Thompson, S., & Barrat, R. (2018). The artist, the curator, and the neural net: A conversation with Robbie Barrat. Paprika! https://yalepaprika.com/articles/the-artist-the-curator-and-the-neural-net-a-conversation-with-robbie-barrat/
- Tiu, E. (2020). Understanding latent space in machine learning. Learn a fundamental, yet often ‘hidden,’ concept of deep learning. Medium. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-latent-space-in-machine-learning-de5a7c687d8d
- Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2018). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), 841–887. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063289.
- Xie, L., Lin, K., Wang, S., Wang, F., & Zhou, J. (2018). Differentially private generative adversarial network. arXiv:1802.06739.
- Xu, D., Yuan, S., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2018, 10-13 December). Fairgan: Fairness-aware generative adversarial networks. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Seattle, WA.
- Ye, G., Tang, Z., Fang, D., Zhu, Z., Feng, Y., Xu, P., Chen, X., & Wang, Z. (2018, 15-19 October). Yet another text captcha solver: A generative adversarial network based approach. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Toronto, Canada.
- Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Rashkin, H., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., Roesner, F., & Choi, Y. (2019). Defending against neural fake news. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. arXiv:1905.12616.
- Zhang, H., Xu, T., Li, H., Zhang, S., Wang, X., Huang, X., & Metaxas, D. N. (2017, 22-29 October). Stackgan: Text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.