Platform pop: disentangling Spotify’s intermediary role in the music industry

References

• Aguiar, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2018). Platforms, promotion, and product discovery: Evidence from spotify playlists (No. w24713). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2007). The long tail: How endless choice is creating unlimited demand. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2011). The Swedish model: Balancing markets and gifts in the music industry. Popular Communication, 9(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2011.536680
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Kerr, P., & Strange, N. (2013). Cowboys or indies? 30 years of the television and digital independent public service production sector. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 8(1), 108–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.8.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019). “First week is editorial, second week is algorithmic”: platform gatekeepers and the platformization of music curation. Social Media+Society, 5(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119880006
   Google Scholar
• Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal branding on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1176534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, P. (2014). Music in the cloud and the digital sublime. Popular Music and Society, 37(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2013.810853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, S., & Garofalo, R. (1977). Rock ‘n’ roll is here to pay: The history and politics of the music industry. Burnham Inc Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., & Gonçalves, B. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of the fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 89–96). Barcelona, Spain: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260–1277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., Fleischer, R., Johansson, A., Snickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (2019). Spotify teardown: Inside the black box of streaming music. Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esteve Del Valle, M., & Borge, R. (2018a). Leaders or brokers? Potential influencers in online parliamentary networks. Policy & Internet, 10(1), 61–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve Del Valle, M., & Borge Bravo, R. (2018b). Echo chambers in parliamentary Twitter networks: the Catalan case. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1715–1735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrahi, K., Schedl, M., Vall, A., Hauger, D., & Tkalcic, M. (2014). Impact of listening behavior on music recommendation. ISMIR.
   Google Scholar
• Fonarow, W. (2006). Empire of Dirt: The aesthetics and Rituals of British indie music. Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galuszka, P. (2015). Music aggregators and intermediation of the digital music market. International Journal of Communication, 9, 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuszka, P., & Wyrzykowska, K. M. (2018). Rethinking independence: What does ‘independent record label’ mean today? In E. Mazierska, L. Gillon, & T. Rigg (Eds.), Popular music in the post-digital age: Politics, economy, culture and technology (pp. 33–50). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauger, D., Kepler, J., Schedl, M., Košir, A., & Tkalcic, M. (2013). The million musical tweets dataset: What can we learn from microblogs. In Proceedings of the 14th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Curitiba, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media+Society, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080
   Google Scholar
• Hendy, D. (2000). Pop music radio in the public service: BBC radio 1 and new music in the 1990s. Media, Culture & Society, 22(6), 743–761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. (1999). Indie: The institutional politics and aesthetics of a popular music genre. Cultural Studies, 13(1), 34–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/095023899335365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., & Meier, L. M. (2014). Popular music, independence and the concept of the alternative in contemporary capitalism. In J. Bennett & N. Strange (Eds.), Media independence: Working with freedom or working for free? (pp. 94–116). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., & Meier, L. M. (2018). What the digitalisation of music tells us about capitalism, culture and the power of the information technology sector. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1555–1570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, J., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M., Park, E., Goldstein, H., Halliwell, M., & Griffith, S. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C. (2018, November 16). Our new “post-playlist” reality. Retrieved December 18, 2019, from https://www.getrevue.co/profile/cheriehu42/issues/our-new-post-playlist-reality-138493
   Google Scholar
• IFPI. (2019, April 2). IFPI global music report 2019. Retrieved May 5, 2019, from https://www.ifpi.org/news/IFPI-GLOBAL-MUSIC-REPORT-2019
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, T. (2016, August 31). Spotify is making its own records … and putting them on playlists. Retrieved December 6, 2019, from https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/spotify-is-creating-its-own-recordings-and-putting-them-on-playlists/
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, T. (2018a, September 23). Spotify’s direct distribution deals: What do artists get paid? Retrieved December 5, 2019, from https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/spotifys-direct-distribution-deals-what-do-the-artists-get/
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, T. (2018b, August 2). Fake artists still dominate Spotify ‘chill’ playlists. Now Universal is fighting back … with Apple Music. Retrieved December 6, 2019, from https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/fake-artists-still-dominate-spotifys-chill-playlists-now-real-artists-are-fighting-back-with-apple-music/
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, T. (2018c, August 14). Spotify is on a collision course with the major record companies. Here’s why. Retrieved December 6, 2019, from https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/spotify-is-on-a-road-to-collision-with-the-record-industry-heres-why/
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, N. (2019, April 28). Forget the DJs: Spotify playlists are the new musical starmakers. Retrieved May 6, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/apr/28/streaming-music-algorithms-spotify
   Google Scholar
• Karp, H. (2018, June 06). Spotify offers managers, artists advances to license music directly to its streaming service: Exclusive. Retrieved May 6, 2019, from https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/8459616/spotify-offers-managers-artists-advances-license-music-directly-exclusive
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Suh, B., & Lee, K. (2014). #nowplaying the future billboard: mining music listening behaviors of twitter users for hit song prediction. SoMeRA '14.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, H. (2003). Site and sound: understanding independent music Scenes. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, C. K., & Tan, B. C. (2001). The internet is changing the music industry. Communications of the ACM, 44(8), 62–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/381641.381658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A. (2001). Time–space (and digital) compression: Software formats, musical networks, and the reorganisation of the music industry. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a3360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A. (2014). Reformatted: Code, Networks, and the transformation of the music industry. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, K., & Wallis, R. (1984). Big sounds from small peoples: The music industry in small countries. Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, L. (2015). ‘Let’s keep music special. F—spotify’: On-demand streaming and the controversy over artist royalties. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2015.1096618
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Joachims, T., & Turnbull, D. (2014). Taste space versus the world: An embedding analysis of listening habits and geography. ISMIR.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. W. (2015). Selling digital music, formatting culture. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. W., & Powers, D. (2015). Control, curation and musical experience in streaming music services. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2015.1090222
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, M. (2018, June 12). Spotify’s new rules of engagement. Retrieved December 6, 2019, from https://www.midiaresearch.com/blog/spotifys-new-rules-of-engagement/
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, M. (2019, March 13). Label market shares. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from http://www.midiaresearch.com/blog/2018-global-label-market-share-stream-engine/
   Google Scholar
• Music Business Worldwide. (2018, July 19). Want to get your track on a Spotify playlist? Join the queue … . Retrieved December 15, 2019, from https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/want-to-get-your-track-on-a-spotify-playlist-join-the-queue/
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K. (1992). Producing pop: Culture and conflict in the popular music industry. E. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K. (2015). Digital divisions and the changing cultures of the music industries (or, the ironies of the artefact and invisibility). Journal of Business Anthropology, 4(1), 151–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v4i1.4793
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K. (2019). From creator to data: The post-record music industry and the digital conglomerates. Media, Culture & Society, 41(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718799395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgård, D. (2016). Lessons from the world’s most advanced market for music streaming services. In P. Wikström & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Business innovation and disruption in the music industry (pp. 175–190). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, T. (2016, November 29). Spotify’s march to monopolise playlists continues. The Daily Digest – Medium. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://medium.com/@ExtendedDigest/spotifys-march-to-monopolise-playlists-continues-5d27beb6ee2a
   Google Scholar
• Pelly, L. (2017, June 21). The secret lives of playlists. Retrieved May 6, 2019, from https://watt.cashmusic.org/writing/thesecretlivesofplaylists
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, G. (2015, July 8). What happens when spotify gets behind an artist? A case study of Hozier and Major Lazer. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://www.billboard.com/articles/business/6656722/spotify-spotlight-support-major-lazer-hozier
   Google Scholar
• Playlists Overtake Albums in Listenership, Says LOOP Study. (2016, September 22). Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://musicbiz.org/news/playlists-overtake-albums-listenership-says-loop-study/
   Google Scholar
• Prey, R. (2015). “Now Playing. You”: Big data and the production of music streaming space (Doctoral dissertation). Communication, Art & Technology: School of Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Prey, R. (in press). Locating power in platformization: Music streaming playlists and curatorial power. Social Media + Society.
   Google Scholar
• The Recording Academy. (2016). Basic grammy guidelines. https://www.grammy.com/sites/com/files/59th_guidelines_quick_reference_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Resnikoff, P. (2016, June 6). Spotify free is bigger than almost every American Radio Station. Retrieved June 24, 2017, from https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/06/16/spotify-free-bigger-radio-stations/
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. (2013). The death and life of the music industry in the digital age. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Vossiuspers UvA.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, G. (2018, July 12). The major music labels are upset that they don’t get more play on Spotify’s mega-popular playlists, says Deutsche Bank. Retrieved May 5, 2019, from https://www.businessinsider.nl/spotify-curated-playlists-labels-2018-7/?international=true&r=US
   Google Scholar
• Spotify Investors. (2018, March). Investor day - March 2018. https://investors.spotify.com/events/investor-day-march-2018/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. (2009, April 29). Same old song. Future of Music Coalition. https://futureofmusic.org/article/research/same-old-song
   Google Scholar
• Trakin, R., & Aswad, J. (2017, July 11). Spotify denies creating ‘fake artists,’ although multiple sources claim the practice is real. https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/spotify-denies-creating-fake-artists-although-multiple-sources-claim-the-practice-is-real-1202492307/
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2011). Election forecasts with Twitter. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310386557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2018, March 23). Form F-1 registration statement, spotify technology, S.A. Retrieved May 6, 2019, from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1639920/000119312518092759/d494294df1a.htm
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J. (2016). Toward a Tweet typology: contributory consumer engagement with brand messages by content type. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 16(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2016.1208125
   Google Scholar
• Vonderau, P. (2019). The Spotify effect: Digital distribution and financial growth. Television & New Media, 20(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417741200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. (2019). Taste in the platform age: Music streaming services and new forms of class distinction. Information, Communication & Society, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1622763
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P. (2013). The music industry: Music in the cloud. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• WIN. (2018). Worldwide independent market report 2018. Worldwide Independent Network Ltd. http://winformusic.org/files/WINTEL%202018/WINTEL%202018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., & Collins, S. (2010). A view from the trenches of music 2.0. Popular Music and Society, 33(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03007760903495634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangerle, E., Pichl, M., Gassler, W., & Specht, G. (2014). #nowplaying music dataset: Extracting listening behavior from Twitter. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on internet-scale multimedia management (pp. 21–26). ACM.
   Google Scholar