References
- Baeza-Yates, R. (2018). Bias on the web. Communications of the ACM, 61(6), 54–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3209581
- Bandy, J., & Diakopoulos, N. (2020). Auditing news curation systems: A case study examining algorithmic and editorial logic in Apple news. In Proceedings of the international conference on web and social media (ICWSM).
- Bechmann, A., & Nielbo, K. L. (2018). Are we exposed to the same ‘News’ in the news feed? Digital Journalism, 6(8), 990–1002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1510741
- Bentley, F., Quehl, K., Wirfs-Brock, J., & Bica, M. (2019). Understanding online news behaviors. In Chi 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 Chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300820
- Borra, E., & Weber, I. (2012). Political insights: Exploring partisanship in web search queries. First Monday, 17(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/fm
- Bozdag, E. (2013). Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(3), 209–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2018). Thematic analysis Handbook of research methods in health social sciences.
- Bruns, A. (2019). It's not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ metaphors have failed us. Paper presented at the IAMCR, Madrid, Spain.
- Courtois, C., Slechten, L., & Coenen, L. (2018). Challenging Google search filter bubbles in social and political information: Disconforming evidence from a digital methods case study. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2006–2015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.004
- Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Harvard University Press.
- Diakopoulos, N., Trielli, D., Stark, J., & Mussenden, S. (2018). I Vote For—How Search Informs Our Choice of Candidate. In M Moore & D Tambini (Eds.), Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (pp. 22). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Dutton, W. H., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). Search and politics: The uses and impacts of search in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United States.
- Epstein, R. (2018). Manipulating Minds: The Power of Search Engines to Influence Votes and Opinions. In M Moore & D Tambini (Eds.), Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (pp. 22). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E. (2015). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), E4512–E4521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112
- Epstein, R., R. E. Robertson, Lazer, D., & Wilson, C. (2017). Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME). Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3134677
- Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/230538.230561
- Garrett, R. K. (2009a). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmc.2009.14.issue-2
- Garrett, R. K. (2009b). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-4
- Goldman, E. (2008). Search engine bias and the demise of search engine Utopianism web search (pp. 121–133). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
- Hannak, A., Sapiezynski, P., Molavi Kakhki, A., Krishnamurthy, B., Lazer, D., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2013, May). Measuring personalization of web search. In Proceedings of the world wide web conference (WWW) (pp. 527–538).
- Helberger, N. (2019). On the democratic role of news recommenders. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623700
- Helberger, N., Karppinen, K., & D'Acunto, L. (2018). Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Information Communication & Society, 21(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271900
- How Search algorithms work (2019). http://www.google.com/search/howsearchworks/algorithms.
- Hu, D. S., Jiang, S., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2019). Auditing the partisanship of Google search snippets. In Web conference 2019: Proceedings of the world wide web conference (WWW 2019) (pp. 693–704). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313654
- Jones, J. M. (2017). Red states outnumber blue for first time in gallup tracking. https://news.gallup.com/poll/188969/red-states-outnumber-blue-first-time-gallup-tracking.aspx.
- Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
- Kay, M., Matuszek, C., & Munson, S. A. (2015). Unequal representation and gender stereotypes in image search results for occupations. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems -- CHI '15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520.
- Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4
- Kliman-Silver, C., Hannak, A., Lazer, D., Wilson, C., & Mislove, A. (2015, October). Location, location, location: The impact of geolocation on web search personalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 internet measurement conference (pp. 121–127).
- Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., Silver, N. A., & Westerwick, A. (2015). Science exemplars in the eye of the beholder. Science Communication, 37(5), 575–601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015596367
- Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., & Westerwick, A. (2015). Confirmation bias in online searches: Impacts of selective exposure before an election on political attitude strength and shifts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12105
- Kulshrestha, J., Eslami, M., Messias, J., Zafar, M. B., Ghosh, S., Gummadi, K. P., & Karahalios, K. (2017). Quantifying search bias. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing -- CSCW '17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998321
- Kulshrestha, J., Eslami, M., Messias, J., Zafar, M. B., Ghosh, S., Gummadi, K. P., & Karahalios, K. (2019). Search bias quantification: Investigating political bias in social media and web search. Information Retrieval Journal, 22(1-2), 188–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018-9341-2
- Le, H., Maragh, R., Ekdale, B., High, A., Havens, T., & Shafiq, Z. (2019). Measuring political personalization of Google news search. Paper presented at the the world wide web conference on -- WWW '19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313682
- McQuail, D., & Van Cuilenburg, J. J. (1983). Diversity as a media policy goal: A strategy for evaluative research and a Netherlands case study. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 31(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928303100301
- Metaxa, D., Park, J. S., Landay, J. A., & Hancock, J. (2019). Search media and elections: A longitudinal investigation of political search results. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3359231
- Muddiman, A. (2013). Searching for the next U.S. president: Differences in search engine results for the 2008 U.S. presidential candidates. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.707440
- Müller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & van Es, B. (2018). Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 959–977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076
- Nechushtai, E., & Lewis, S. C. (2019). What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 298–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York, New York, United States: Penguin Press.
- Puschmann, C. (2018). Beyond the bubble: Assessing the diversity of political search results. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 824–843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1539626
- Robertson, R. E., Jiang, S., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Lazer, D., & Wilson, C. (2018). Auditing partisan audience bias within google search. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3274417
- Robertson, R. E., Lazer, D., & Wilson, C. (2018). Auditing the personalization and composition of politically-related search engine results pages. In Proceedings of the wide web conference (WWW).
- Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques (Vol. 21, pp. 138–139): SAGE Publications.
- Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.2010.60.issue-3
- Thurman, N. (2019). Personalization of news. In The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–6).
- Trevisan, F., Hoskins, A., Oates, S., & Mahlouly, D. (2016). The Google voter: Search engines and elections in the new media ecology. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1261171
- Trielli, D., & Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Search as news curator: The role of Google in shaping attention to news information. In Chi 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 Chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300683
- Vijaymeena, M. K., & Kavitha, K. (2016). A survey on similarity measures in text mining. Machine Learning and Applications: An International Journal, 3(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5121/mlaij
- Weber, I., & Jaimes, A. (2011). Who uses web search for what. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining -- WSDM '11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935839
- Weber, P. J., & Weissert, W. (2018). Texas turnout high as Cruz, O'Rourke end close senate race. https://www.apnews.com/b6e7994936094d9ba46baa1510cad6b1.
- White, R. (2013, July). Beliefs and biases in web search. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 3–12).
- White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2015). Belief dynamics and biases in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 33(4), 1–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2746229
- Whyte, C. E. (2016). Thinking inside the (black) box: Agenda setting, information seeking, and the marketplace of ideas in the 2012 presidential election. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1680–1697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814567985