Vocations, visions and vitalities of data analysis. An introduction

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., Bellanova, R., & Kaufmann, M. (2019). Doing and mediating critique: An invitation to practice companionship. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 3–19. 50th Anniversary Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618810925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R. (2017). Digital, politics, and algorithms: Governing digital data through the lens of data protection. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016679167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Kluwe Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A. (2001). What values do you teach when you teach mathematics? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 346–349. www.jstor.org/stable/41199894
   Google Scholar
• Boström, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society: The information age – economy, society and culture. Vol. 1. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2015). A world without causation: Big data and the coming of age of posthumanism. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 833–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576817
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P., & Presmeg, N. (2010). Critical issues in mathematics education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. (2020). Why your brain is not a computer. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/feb/27/why-your-brain-is-not-a-computer-neuroscience-neural-networks-consciousness
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, P. (without date). Umberto Eco: Texts, sign systems and the risks of over-interpretation. The Times Literary Supplement. https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/umberto-eco-texts-sign-systems-risks-interpretation/ (22 April 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, P., & Randviir, A. (2009). Introduction: What is sociosemiotics? Semiotica, 173(173), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.001
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and Induction in scientific practice. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2001). I have a taste for the secret. In J. Derrida & M. Ferraris (Eds.), A taste for the secret (pp. 1–92). Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, M. (2000). Poststructuralism, complexity and poetics. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2015a). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene. Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2015b). Birth of the kennel: A lecture by Donna Haraway, August 2000. The European Graduate School. Available at: http://www.egs.edu/faculty/donna-haraway/articles/birth-of-the-kennel/ (accessed 26 May 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, M. (2016). New animism in policing: Re-animating the rule of law? In B. Bradford, B. Jauregui, I. Loader, & J. Steinberg (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Global Policing (pp. 406–428). SAGE Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M. (2016). Drone/body – The Drone’s power to sense and construct emergencies. In K. B. Bergtora Sandvik & M. Gabrielsen Jumbert (Eds.), The good drone (pp. 168–194). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M. (2017). The co-construction of crime predictions: Dynamics between digital data, software and human beings. In N. R. Fyfe, H. O. I. Gundhus, & K. Vrist Rønn (Eds.), Moral issues in Intelligence-led Policing (pp. 143–160). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M. (2019). Who connects the dots? Agents and agency in predictive policing. In M. Hoijtink & M. Leese (Eds.), Technology and agency in International relations Chapter 7. (pp. 141–163). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M., Bonde-Thylstrup, N., Burgess, J. P., & Rudinow-Sætnan, A. (forthcoming). Data criticality. STS encounters special issue “The Data Moment”.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2006). Life (vitalism). Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406062697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2013). Facing Gaïa: Six lectures on the political theology of nature. Gifford Lectures. 18–28 February 2013.https://www.giffordlectures.org/lectures/facing-gaia-new-enquiry-natural-religion
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Lively data, social fitness and biovalue: The intersections of health self-tracking and social media. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666324
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016a). The quantified self. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016b). Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data-human assemblages. Big Data and Society, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715619947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjoo, F. (2018). Here’s the conversation we really need to have about bias at Google. New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/30/technology/bias-google-trump.html
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2008). I eat an apple. On theorizing subjectivities. Subjectivity, 22(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.2
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, R. (2017). Transmigration of the souls. Handout, Jack Shainman Gallery “Richard Mosse: Heat Maps”.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, R. (2016). Where’s the money? http://kingsreview.co.uk/articles/wheres-the-money/#_ftn5
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., & Rockhill, T. G. (2006). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, S., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2018). Deconstructing the data life-cycle in digital humanitarianism. Information, Communication & Society . Online first: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1521457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2013). The ‘social life of methods’: A critical introduction. Theory, Culture and Society, 30(4), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413486160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, I. (2018). Jetzt Wird’s Kriminell. https://www.fluter.de/Predictive-Policing
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W. (2015, May 11). A fitbit fanatic’s cry for help: I’m addicted to steps. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/05/11/a-fitbit-fanatics-cry-for-help/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a12045b6e04f
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, A., & Waite, M. (2011). Datum. In The concise Oxford English Dictionary (pp. 365–365). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sætnan, A. R., Lomell, H. M., & Hammer, S. (2011). Introduction: By the very act of counting – the mutual construction of statistics and society. In A. R. Sætnan, H. M. Lomell, & S. Hammer (Eds.), The mutual construction of statistics and society (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, E. (2005). The global genome: Biotechnology, politics and culture. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Eynden, V. (2014). The research data life cycle. In L. Corti, V. Van den Eynden, L. Bishop, & M. Woollard (Eds.), Managing and sharing research data (pp. 17–23). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., Jacomy, M., Meunier, A., & Latour, B. (2017). An unexpected journey: A few lessons from sciences Po Médialab’s experience. Big Data and Society. July–December, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717720949
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar