References
- Bonafide, C. P., Jamison, D., & Foglia, E. (2017). The emerging market of smartphone-integrated infant physiologic monitors. JAMA, 317(4), 353–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19137
- Cekaite, A., & Kvist Holm, M. (2017). The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301293
- Cheok, A. (2010). Huggy Pajama: A remote Interactive touch and Hugging System. In A. D. Cheok (Ed.), Art and technology of entertainment computing and communication (pp. 161–194). Springer London.
- Crucianelli, L., Wheatley, L., Filippetti, M., Jenkinson, P., Kirk, E., & Fotopoulou, A. (2018). The mindedness of maternal touch. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.01.010.
- Day, S., & Lury, C. (2016). Biosensing: Tracking Persons. In D. Nafus (Ed.), Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life (pp. 43–66). MIT Press.
- Feldman, R., Singer, M., & Zagoory, O. (2010). ‘Touch Attenuates infants’ physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental Science, 13(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00890.x
- Field, T. (2002). Infants’ need for touch. Human Development, 45(2), 100–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000048156
- Fulkerson, M. (2014). The first sense: A philosophical study of human touch. MIT Press.
- Greenfield, R. (2013). Tracked since birth: The rise of extreme baby monitoring. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/3021601/tracked-since-birth-the-pros-and-cons-of-extreme-baby-monitoring
- Hertenstein, M., & Campos, J. (2001). Emotion regulation via maternal touch. Infancy, 2(4), 549–566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0204_09
- Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Jewitt, C., & Leder Mackley, K. (2019). Methodological dialogues across multimodality and sensory ethnography: Digital touch communication. Qualitative Research, 19(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118796992
- Jewitt, C., Price, S., Leder Mackley, K., Yiannoutsou, N., & Atkinson, D. (2020). Interdisciplinary insights for digital touch communication. Springer Nature.
- Kai, J. (1996). What worries parents when their preschool children are acutely ill, and why: A qualitative study. BMJ, 313(7063), 983–986. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7063.983
- Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused Ethnography. Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). Art (44).
- Lickliter, R. (2011). The integrated development of sensory organization. Clinics in Perinatology, 38(4), 591–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2011.08.007
- Lupton, D. (2013). Infant Embodiment and interembodiment: A review of Sociocultural Perspectives. Childhood, 20(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212447244
- Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726
- Lupton, D., & Maslen, S. (2018). The more-than-human sensorium: Sensory engagements with digital self-tracking technologies. (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3170701). Social Science Research Network.
- Lupton, D., & Pedersen, S. (2016, February). An Australian survey of women’s use of pregnancy and parenting apps. https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/1480
- Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328
- Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
- Maslen, S., & Lupton, D. (2019). Enacting chronic illness with and through digital media: A feminist new materialist approach. Information, Communication & Society. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602665.
- McDonald, T. (2015). Affecting relations: Domesticating the internet in a south-western Chinese town. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.924981
- Nafus, D. (2016a). Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life. MIT Press.
- Nafus, D. (2016b). The domestication of data: why embracing digital data means embracing bigger questions, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, pp. 384–399.
- Nelson, M. (2008). Watching children: Describing the use of baby monitors on Epinions.com. Journal of Family Issues, 29(4), 516–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07310319
- O’Brien, M., & Lynch, H. (2011). Exploring the role of touch in the first year of life: Mothers’ perspectives of tactile interactions with their infants. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4276/030802211X12996065859247
- O’Malley Halley, J. (2009). Boundaries of touch: Parenting and adult-child intimacy. University of Illinois Press.
- Pink, S., & Leder Mackley, K. (2014). Re-enactment methodologies for everyday life research: Art therapy insights for video ethnography. Visual Studies, 29(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2014.887266
- Pink, S., Mackley, K. L., Morosanu, R., Mitchell, V., & Bhamra, T. (2017). Making homes: Ethnography and design. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Pink, S, & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-Term Ethnography: Intense Routes to Knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.66
- Tahhan, D. (2008). Depth and space in sleep: Intimacy, touch and the body in Japanese co-sleeping rituals. Body & Society, 14(4), 37–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X08096894
- Wang, J., O’Kane, A., Newhouse, N., Rhys Sethu-Jones, G., & de Barbaro, K. (2017). Quantified baby: Parenting and the use of a baby wearable in the wild. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1 (CSCW): 108:1–108:19.