References
- Anderson, A. A., & Huntington, H. E. (2017). Social media, science, and attack discourse: How Twitter discussions of climate change use sarcasm and incivility. Science Communication, 39(5), 598–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017735113
- Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspapers coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003
- Auger, G. A. (2014). Rhetorical framing: Examining the message structure of nonprofit organizations on Twitter. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1499
- Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
- boyd, d., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Book of Proceedings (pp. 1–10). IEEE Computer Society.
- Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? Polity.
- Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110097030
- Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x
- Halliday, M. A. K. (2000). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
- Hemphill, L., Culotta, A., & Heston, M. (2013). Framing in social media: How the US Congress uses twitter hashtags to frame political issues. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2317335
- Hermida, A. (2017). Twitter, breaking the news, and hybridity in journalism. In B. Franklin & S. A. Eldridge II (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital journalism studies (pp. 407–416). Routledge.
- Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244
- IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Cambridge UP.
- Kaiser, J. (2017). Public spheres of skepticism: Climate skeptics’ online comments in the German networked public sphere. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1661–1682.
- Kaiser, J., & Rhomberg, M. (2016). Questioning the doubt: Climate skepticism in German newspaper reporting on COP17. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 556–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1050435
- Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
- Lo, A. Y. (2014). The right to doubt: Climate-change scepticism and asserted rights to private property. Environmental Politics, 23(4), 549–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.884310
- Maeseele, P., & Raeijmaekers, D. (2017). Nothing on the news but the establishment blues? Toward a framework of depoliticization and agonistic media pluralism. Journalism. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917739476
- Moernaut, R., Mast, J., & Pauwels, L. (2020). Visual and multimodal framing analysis. In L. Pauwels & D. Mannay (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 484-499). Sage.
- Moernaut, R., Mast, J., & Pauwels, L. (2018a). Working mechanically or organically?. Journalism Practice, 12(10), 1311–1331. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1387070
- Moernaut, R., Mast, J., & Pauwels, L. (2018b). Framing climate change: A multi-level model. In W. L. Filho, E. Manolas, A. M. Azul, U. M. Azeiteiro, & H. McGhie (Eds.), Handbook of climate change communication: Vol 1 (pp. 215–271). Springer.
- Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.
- O’Neill, S. J., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B., & Boykoff, M. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 380–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2535
- Porter, A. J., & Hellsten, L. (2014). Investigating participatory dynamics through social media using a multideterminant ‘‘frame’’ approach: The case of Climategate on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 1024–1041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12065
- Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (KMI) (2018). Klimaat. https://www.meteo.be/meteo/view/nl/65657-Klimaat.html
- Takahashi, B., Edwards, G., Roberts, J. T., & Duan, R. (2015). Exploring the use of online platforms for climate change policy and public engagement by NGOs in Latin America. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.1001764
- Van Gorp, B. (2006). Framing asiel. Indringers en slachtoffers in de pers [Framing asylum. Intruders and victims in the press]. Acco.
- van Zoonen, L., Vis, F., & Mihelj, S. (2011). YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media and Society, 13(8), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405020
- Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Lambert, F. H. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006
- Woods, R., Fernández, A., & Coen, S. (2010). The use of religious metaphors by UK newspapers to describe and denigrate climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 21(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510385061