Information literacy challenges in digital culture: conflicting engagements of trust and doubt

References

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkun, M. (2013). A culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, M., & Knight, P. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 347–365). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2018). Nervous states: How feeling took over the world. Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• de Zúñiga, H. G., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., Patiño, M. G., & Liu, J. H. (2019). Trust in institutional actors across 22 countries: Examining political, science, and media trust around the world. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 74, 237–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2019-1329en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gran, A. B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2020). To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124
   Google Scholar
• Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2019). Invisible search and online search engines: The ubiquity of search in everyday life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, A. J., Fister, B., & MacMillan, M. (2020). Information literacy in the age of algorithms: Student experiences with news and information, and the need for change: Project Information Research Institute. https://projectinfolit.org/publications/algorithm-study
   Google Scholar
• Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapitzke, C. (2003). (In) formation literacy: A positivist epistemology and a politics of (out) formation. Educational Theory, 53(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2003.00037.x
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth decay: A threat to policymaking and democracy. Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lenard, P. T. (2008). Trust your compatriots, but count your change: The roles of trust, mistrust and distrust in democracy. Political Studies, 56(2), 312–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00693.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. (2019). The unknowers: How strategic ignorance rules the world. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, S., Ortega, T., Breakstone, J., & Wineburg, S. (2017). The challenge that’s bigger than fake news: Civic reasoning in a social media environment. American Educator.
   Google Scholar
• Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates web-site evaluation. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, D. (2008). Manufacturing uncertainty: Contested science and the protection of the public’s health and environment. In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 90–107). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2019). Swedish teenagers’ difficulties and abilities to determine digital news credibility. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloombury.
   Google Scholar
• Origgi, G. (2008). Trust, authority and epistemic responsibility. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de La Ciencia, 23(1), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697–705. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, L., & Green, J. (2016). Using joint interviews to add analytic value. Qualitative Health Research, 26(12), 1638–1648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315580103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. N. Proctor, & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–33). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen, R. (2011). Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1243–1256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stano, S. (2020). The internet and the spread of conspiracy content. In M. Butter, & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 483–496). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger, & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R., & Talja, S. (2005). Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice. The Library Quarterly, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/497311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Stanford History Education Group Working Paper No. 2017-A1.
   Google Scholar