Algorithmic meta-capital: Bourdieusian analysis of social power through algorithms in media consumption

References

• Arsel, Z., & Thompson, C. J. (2011). Demythologizing consumption practices: How consumers protect their field-dependent identity investments from devaluing marketplace myths. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(Feb), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1086/656389
   Google Scholar
• Askegaard, S., & Linnet, J. (2011). Towards an epistemology of consumer culture theory: Phenomenology and the context of contexts. Marketing Theory, 11(4), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111418796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechmann, A., & Nielbo, K. L. (2018) Are we exposed to the same “news” in the news feed? Digital Journalism, 6(8), 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1510741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beel, J., & Gipp, B. (2009). Google scholar’s ranking algorithm: An introductory overview. In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI’09), 1, 230–241.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R., & Katona, Z. (2020). Curation algorithms and filter bubbles in social networks. Marketing Science, 39(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2014). Critical theory and the digital. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, B. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2016). The gap between the media and the public. In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking journalism again (pp. 175–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2018). If … then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, R., & boyd, d. (2016). Who Controls the public sphere in an Era of algorithms? New York City: Data & Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Allison, P. D. (2014). Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414520960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2019a, September 6). Internet penetration rate worldwide 2019, by region. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/269329/penetration-rate-of-the-internet-by-region/
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2019b, August 9). Share of U.S. population with a social media profile 2008-2019. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/273476/percentage-of-us-population-with-a-social-network-profile/
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2003). Media meta-capital: Extending the range of Bourdieu’s field theory. Theory and Society, 32(5–6), 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004915.37826.5d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2004). Liveness, “reality,” and the mediated habitus from television to the mobile phone. The Communication Review, 7(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490886952
   Google Scholar
• Creech, B., & Mendelson, A. L. (2015) Imagining the journalist of the future: Technological visions of journalism education and newswork. The Communication Review, 18(2), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.1031998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitchett, J., & Caruana, R. (2015). Exploring the role of discourse in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Generalised scepticism: How people navigate news on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1751–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1450887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2011). Can an algorithm be wrong? Twitter Trends, the specter of censorship, and our faith in the algorithms around us. Culture Digitally. http://culturedigitally.org/2011/10/can-an-algorithm-be-wrong/
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2016). #Trendingistrending – when algorithms become culture. In R. Seyfert & J. Roberge (Eds.), Algorithmic Cultures: Essays on meaning, performance and new technologies (pp. 52–75). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ Comment: So, what Is a conceptual paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425
   Google Scholar
• Goffey, A. (2008). Algorithm. In M. Fuller (Ed.), Software studies – A lexicon (pp. 15–20). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell, M. J. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brorius, H. (2018). Burst of the filter bubble? Effects of personalization on the diversity of google news. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1997a). Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu's theory of tastes from its critics. Poetics, 25(Nov), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00010-7
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1997b). Poststructuralist lifestyle analysis: Conceptualizing the social patterning of consumption in postmodernity. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1086/209487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1998). Does culture capital structure American consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25(June), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/209523
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, A., & Latour, K. A. (2013). Framing the game: Assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/672358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatow, G., & Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 950–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacsó, P. (2011). Google Scholar duped and deduped – the aura of “robometrics”. Online Information Review, 35(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. (2016) Social news = journalism evolution? How the integration of UGC into newswork helps and hinders the role of the journalist. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1168709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., & Rothschild, D. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longford, G. (2005). Pedagogies of digital citizenship and the politics of code. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 9(1), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2005916
   Google Scholar
• Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017). The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montfort, N., Baudoin, P., Bell, J., Bogost, I., Douglass, J., Marino, M. C., … Vawter, N. (2012). 10 PRINT CHR$ (205.5 + RND (1)): GOTO 10. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. (2015). Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeepers. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Reuters Institute digital news report 2016. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, D., & Möllers, N. (2017). Algorithmic IF  … THEN rules and the conditions and consequences of power. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1156141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K. (2016). News media, search engines and social networking sites as varieties of online gatekeepers. In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking journalism again (pp. 81–96). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction. Crown Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Rethinking journalism again: Societal role and public relevance in a digital age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. A. (2003). The Ethnography of media production. In M. A. Peterson (Ed.), Anthropology & mass communication: Media and Myth in the New millennium (pp. 161–198). Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. (2016). Networked journalism. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), Sage handbook of digital journalism (pp. 149–163). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L. (2002). The sociology of habit: The perspective of pierre Bourdieu. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 22(1_suppl), 61S–69S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492020220S108
   Google Scholar
• Seaver, N. (2019). Knowing algorithms. In J. Vertesi & D. Ribes (Eds.), digitalSTS: A field guide for science & technology studies (pp. 412–422). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, J. (2016). Reappraising journalism’s normative foundations. In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking journalism again (pp. 35–48). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of Computational agency. Colorado Tech Law Journal, 13, 203–217.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2016). Media effects: Theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2016a). Emotion and journalism. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), Sage handbook of digital journalism (pp. 128–144). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2016b). Is there a ‘postmodern turn’ in journalism? In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking journalism again (pp. 97–112). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, M. (2017). Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. (2017). ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar