Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: intersectionality patterns and associated lessons

References

• Alam, K., & Imran, S. (2015). The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia. Information Technology & People, 28(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2014-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Perrin, A. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. (Ed.), (2014). E-governance and social inclusion: Concepts and cases. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. (2012). Developing intersectional solidarities: A plea for queer intersectionality. In M. S. Smith & F. Jaffer (Eds.), Beyond the queer alphabet: Conversations on gender, sexuality and intersectionality (pp. 19–23). Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of Internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, K., & Smith, L. (2018). Digital inclusion and online behaviour: Five typologies of Australian Internet users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carney, G. M., & Gray, M. (2015). Unmasking the “elderly mystique”: Why it is time to make the personal political in ageing research. Journal of Aging Studies, 35, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2015.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D. D., & Fullwood, C. (2018). An online life like any other: Identity, self-determination, and social networking among adults with intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chib, A., & Aricat, R. G. (2017). Belonging and communicating in a bounded cosmopolitanism: The role of mobile phones in the integration of transnational migrants in Singapore. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chib, A., & Jiang, Q. (2014). Investigating modern-day Talaria: Mobile phones and the mobility-impaired in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, J., & McDonald, S. J. (2013). The limits of technology. Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 945–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.748817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. (2016). Intersectionality. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of feminist theory (pp. 385–406). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8.
   Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old. Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, S., Green, J., & Maxwell, H. (2017). I’ve got a mobile phone too! Hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(4), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2016.1167260
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2006). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access: Media, disability, and the politics of participation. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Equal Rights Trust. (2016). Equal rights review – special focus: Intersectionality, 16 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Friemel, T. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell, N. M., Rosenberg, D. E., Demiris, G., LaCroix, A. Z., & Patel, K. V. (2013). Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gressgård, R. (2008). Mind the gap: Intersectionality, complexity and ‘the event’. Theory and Science, 10(1).
   Google Scholar
• Grue, J. (2016). The social meaning of disability: A reflection on categorisation, stigma and identity. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(6), 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannides, T., Bailey, N., & Kaoukji, D. (2016). Voices of refugees: Information and communication needs of refugees in Greece and Germany. BBC Media Action.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, V. S., & Gonzalez, C. (2016). Community variations in low-income latino families’ technology adoption and integration. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Chen, Y., & Hewitt, L. (2011). Age differences in constraints encountered by seniors in their use of computers and the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leurs, K. (2021). Resilience and digital inclusion: The digital re-making of vulnerability? In P. Tsatsou (Ed.), Vulnerable people and digital inclusion: Theoretical and applied perspectives. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S., & Pham, B. (2016). If you are a foreigner in a foreign country, you stick together: Technologically mediated communication and acculturation of migrant students. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2171–2188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816655612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A., Kennan, M. A., Thompson, K. M., & Qayum, A. (2013). Connecting with new information landscapes: Information literacy practices of refugees. Journal of Documentation, 69(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411311295351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. (2016). Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K., Nazroo, J., & Marshall, A. (2019). Digital inclusion in later life: Cohort changes in internet use over a ten-year period in England. Ageing and Society, 39(9), 1914–1932. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, V. M. (2015). Pursuing intersectionality: Unsettling dominant imaginaries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348
   Google Scholar
• Mubarak, F. (2015). Towards a renewed understanding of the complex nerves of the digital divide. Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(1), 71–U104. https://doi.org/10.36251/josi.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U., & Tynes, B. M. (2016). Introduction. In S. U. Noble & B. M. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (pp. 1–20). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Olphert, W., & Damodaran, L. (2013). Older people and digital disengagement: A fourth digital divide? Gerontology, 59(6), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2001). An intersectional approach to discrimination: Addressing multiple grounds in human rights claims. Discussion Paper. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H. A. (2018). Exploring refugees and ICTs: Innovating towards inclusion and integration in fragile environments. Centre for Frugal Innovation in Africa Working Paper Series No.5.
   Google Scholar
• Scambler, G. (2018). Heaping blame on shame: ‘weaponising stigma’ for neoliberal times. The Sociological Review Monographs, 66(4), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118778177
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, F., Yalcin, B., & Priestley, M. (2017). Internet access for disabled people: Understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-4
   Google Scholar
• Schreurs, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2017). Problematising the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use: Aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (2016). Intersectional discrimination and substantive equality: A comparative and theoretical perspective. The Equal Rights Review – Special Focus: Intersectionality, 16(2016), 73–102. Equal Rights Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Ståsett, S. J. (2007). The ethics of vulnerability, social inclusion and social capital. Forum for Development Studies, 34(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2007.9666365
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Intersectionality: A theoretical adjustment. In R. Buikema, G. Griffin, & N. Lykke (Eds.), Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate feminist research (pp. 45–59). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• The Earth Institute and Ericsson. (2016). How information and communications technology can accelerate action on the sustainable development goals: ICT and STGs. Final Report. Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. (2018). Focus groups. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (pp. 237–255). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. (2011). Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their research? Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. (2014). Internet studies: Past, present and future directions. Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. (2021). Ageing: The two faces of Janus in digital inclusion. International Journal of Communication, 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P., Youngs, G., & Watt, Y. (2017). Literacy and identity links forging digital inclusion? Critical reflections and signposts from a qualitative study. In J. Choudrie, P. Tsatsou, & S. Kurnia (Eds.), Innovative ICT-enabled services and social inclusion (pp. 335–358). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tynes, B. M., Schuschke, J., & Noble, S. U. (2016). Digital intersectionality theory and the #BlackLivesmatter movement. In S. U. Noble & B. M. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (pp. 21–40). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010-2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2014.994544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, N. (2005). Inclusive feminism: A third Wave theory of women’s commonality. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar