Affordances, movement dynamics, and a centralized digital communication platform in a networked movement

References

• Ag, M. (2019, October 24). Inside Hong Kong’s leaderless uprising. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2019/10/inside-hong-kongs-leaderless-uprising/
   Google Scholar
• Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014). Mobilization through online social networks: The political protest of the indignados in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple Daily. (2019, July 2). 55% respondents: LIHKG the most critical. Apple Daily, A14. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.870379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caraway, B. (2016). OUR Walmart: A case study of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1064464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. C. K. (2020). Some thoughts on the endgame of resistance: Ngo-yiu Naam-chaau as terminal reciprocity. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 21(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2020.1721110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W., & Chan, W. Y. (2017). Explaining spontaneous occupation: Antecedents, contingencies, and spaces in the umbrella movement. Social Movement Studies, 16(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1252667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. C., & Chen, P. L. (2016). Exploring online public participation in networked social movements: The case of Taiwan 318 movement. Journal of Communication Research and Practice, 6(1), 117–150. (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.6123/JCRP.2016.005
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W., Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., & Tang, G. (2021). Total mobilization from below: Abeyance networks, threats, and emotions in Hong Kong's freedom summer. The China Quarterly. Accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2017). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617714944
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. (2018). After the #keyword: Eliciting, sustaining, and coordinating participation across the Occupy Movement. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117750720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, D. (2011). Digitally enabled social change. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2020). Democracy reloaded. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. T. (2019). Street citizens. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensby, A. (2017). Open networks and secret Facebook groups: Exploring cycle effects on activists’ social media use in the 2010/11 UK student protests. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1201421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D. (2019, July 7). As Hong Kong protesters embrace Telegram, when will the messaging app fix one of its biggest security flaws? Hong Kong Free Press. https://hongkongfp.com/2019/07/07/hong-kong-protesters-embrace-telegram-will-messaging-app-fix-one-biggest-security-flaws/
   Google Scholar
• Ho, M. S. (2019). Challenging Beijing’s mandate of heaven. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazraee, E., & Novak, A. (2018). Digitally mediated protest: Social media affordances for collective identity construction. Social Media + Society, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118765740
   Google Scholar
• Ku, A. (2007). Constructing and contesting the “order” imagery in media discourse: Implications for civil society in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980701306613
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2018). Internet alternative media, movement experience, and radicalism: The case of post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 17(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1404448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F. (2020). Solidarity in the anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies, 52(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2018). Media and protest logics in the digital era. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., Tang, G. K. Y., & Cheng, E. (2019). Hong Kong’s summer of uprising: From anti-extradition to anti-authoritarian protests. China Review, 19(4), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., Cheng, E. W., Yuen, S., Tang, G. K. Y., & Liang, H. (2021). Dynamics of tactical radicalization and public receptiveness in Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill movement. Journal of Contemporary Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, D. K. K., & Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Cultivating an online counter-public: Examining usage and political impact of internet alternative media. International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercea, D. (2018). Transnational activism in support of national protest: Questions of identity and organization. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 18(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E. (2015). Democratizing kompromat: The affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 1158–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1021705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: Connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. (2020). Enclave deliberation and social movement mobilization: The days in occupy central. Social Movement Studies, 19(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1631154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G. K. Y., & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313490625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. (2018). Social media and informal organization of citizen activism: Lessons from the use of Facebook in the Sunflower movement. Social Media + Society, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117751384
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veg, S. (2017). The rise of “localism” and civic identity in post-handover Hong Kong: Questioning the Chinese nation-state. China Quarterly, 230, 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Verhulst, J. (2011). Selection and response bias in protest surveys. Mobilization, 16(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.16.2.j475m8627u4u8177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, E. (1981). Democracy in the shadows. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Liu, W., & Gao, S. (2016). Hashtags and information virality in networked social movement: Examining hashtag co-occurrence patterns. Online Information Review, 40(7), 850–866. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2015-0378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workneh, T. W. (2020). Social media, protest, and outrage communication in Ethiopia: Toward fractured publics or pluralistic polity? Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1811367
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, R. (2019, August 3). Hong Kong protests: How the city’s Reddit-like forum LIHKG has become the leading platform for organising demonstrations. South China Morning Post, https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3021224/hong-kong-protests-how-citys-reddit-forum-lihkg-has-become
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, S. (2018). Contesting middle-class civility: Place-based collective identity in Hong Kong’s occupy Mongkok. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1434501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, S., Tang, G. K. Y., Lee, F. L. F., & Cheng, W. (2019).The protest site: Methods of onsite surveys during the Anti-ELAB Movement. Taiwanese Sociology, 38, 163–174. [in Chinese]
   Google Scholar