11,299
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Nonhuman humanitarianism: when 'AI for good' can be harmful

Pages 850-868 | Received 21 Dec 2020, Accepted 22 Mar 2021, Published online: 08 Apr 2021

References

  • Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics. Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Duke University Press.
  • Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2020). Digital labour at economic margins: African workers and the global information economy. Review of African Political Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2020.1728243
  • Appadurai, A. (1993). Number in the postcolonial imagination. In C. Breckenridge & P. Van der Veer (Eds.), Orientalism and the postcolonial predicament (pp. 314–339). University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Bakardjieva, M. (2015). Rationalizing sociality: An unfinished script for socialbots. The Information Society, 31(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1020197
  • Barassi, V. (2020). Child, data, citizen. MIT Press.
  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology. Polity.
  • Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation. MIT Press.
  • boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
  • Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence. MIT Press.
  • Burrell, J., & Oreglia, E. (2015). The myth of market price information: Mobile phones and the application of economic knowledge in ICTD. Economy and Society, 44(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013742
  • Calhoun, C. (2008). The imperative to reduce suffering. In M. Barnett & T. G. Weiss (Eds.), Humanitarianism in question (pp. 73–97). Cornell University Press.
  • Charlson, F., van Ommeren, M., Flaxman, A., Cornett, J., Whiteford, H., & Saxena, S. (2019). New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 394(10194), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30934-1
  • Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Chun, W. H. K. (2011). Programmed visions: Software and memory. MIT Press.
  • Craig, C., Cave, S., Dihal, K., Dillon, S., Montgomery, J., Singler, B., & Taylor, L. (2018). Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter. The Royal Society. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  • Crawford, K., & Joler, V. (2018). Anatomy of an AI System: the Amazon Echo as an anatomical map of labour, data and planetary resources. Retrieved December 16, 2020, from https://anatomyof.ai/
  • Digital Impact Alliance (DIAL). (2018). Foodbot and the AIDA Chatbot builder: case study. https://digitalimpactalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/mVAM.pdf
  • Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality. How high-tech tools profile, police and punish the poor. St Martin’s Press.
  • Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5
  • Gebru, T. (2020). Race and gender. In M. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (pp. 253–270). Oxford University Press.
  • Gehl, R. W., & Bakadjieva, M. (2017). Socialbots and their friends. In R. W. Gehl & M. Bakadjieva (Eds.), Socialbots and their friends: Digital media and the automation of sociality (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
  • Gell, A. (1992). The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In J. Coote & A. Shelton (Eds.), Anthropology, art and aesthetics (pp. 40–66). Clarendon.
  • Gunkel, D. (2018). Ars ex machina: Rethinking responsibility in the age of creative machines. In A. Guzman (Ed.), Human-Machine communication (pp. 221–236). Peter Lang.
  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Privacy International. (2018). The humanitarian metadata problem: 'Doing no harm' in the digital era.
  • International Committee of the Red Cross, The Engine Room and Block Party. (2017). Humanitarian futures for messaging apps. ICRC.
  • Kember, S., & Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after new media. Mediation as a vital process. MIT Press.
  • Krause, M. (2014). The good project. Chicago University Press.
  • Lester, A., & Dussart, F. (2014). Colonization and the origins of humanitarian governance. Cambridge University Press.
  • Luria, M., Seering, J., Forlizzi, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2020). Designing chatbots as community-owned agents. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ‘20) (pp. 1–3). Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406134
  • Madianou, M. (2019a). Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media & Society, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146
  • Madianou, M. (2019b). The biometric assemblage: Surveillance, experimentation, profit, and the measuring of refugee bodies. Television & New Media, 20(6), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419857682
  • Madianou, M. (2021). Technological futures as colonial debris: Tech-for-good as technocolonialism. In Zylinska, J. (Ed.), The Future of Media. London, UK: Goldsmiths Press.
  • Madianou, M., Ong, J. C., Longboan, L., & Cornelio, J. S. (2016). The appearance of accountability: Communication technologies and power asymmetries in humanitarian aid and disaster recovery. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 960–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12258
  • Mbembe, A. (2017). Critique of black reason. Duke University Press.
  • McDonald, S. (2019, August 12). From space to supply chain: Humanitarian data governance. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3436179 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436179
  • Natale, S. (2019). If software is narrative: Joseph Weizenbaum, artificial intelligence and the biographies of ELIZA. New Media and Society, 21(3), 712–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818804980
  • Noble, S. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. New York University Press.
  • Nothias, T. (2020). Access granted: Facebook’s free basics in Africa. Media, Culture & Society, 42(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719890530
  • Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box society. Cambridge University Press.
  • Petryna, A. (2009). When experiments travel. Clinical trials and the global search for human subjects. Princeton University Press.
  • Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.
  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in latin america. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
  • Sengoopta, C. (2003). Imprint of the Raj: How fingerprinting was born in colonial India. Macmillan.
  • Shi, Z. R., Wang, C., & Fang, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence for social good: A survey. ArXiv [preprint]. arXiv:2001.01818 [cs.CY].
  • Stephens, T. N., Joerin, A., Rauws, M., & Werk, L. (2019). Feasibility of pediatric obesity and prediabetes treatment support through tess, the AI behavioral coaching chatbot. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 9(3), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz043
  • Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 49(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
  • Wa Thiong’o, N. (1981/2004). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
  • Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Profile.