Building viewer engagement through interaction rituals on Twitch.tv

References

• Anker Nexø, L., & Strandell, J. (2020). Testing, filtering, and insinuating: Matching and attunement of emoji use patterns as non-verbal flirting in online dating. Poetics, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101477
   Google Scholar
• Boyns, D., & Loprieno, D. (2013). Feeling through presence: Toward a theory of interaction rituals and parasociality in online social worlds. In Benski, & Fisher (Eds.), Internet and emotions (pp. 47–61). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Bernier, C., Heckscher, C., & Mimno, D. (2018). Interaction ritual threads: Does IRC theory apply online? In W. B. Weininger, A. Lareau, & O. Lizardo (Eds.), Ritual, emotion, violence (pp. 99–142). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diwanji, V., Reed, A., Ferchaud, A., Seibert, J., Weinbrecht, V., & Sellers, N. (2020). Don’t just watch, join in: Exploring information behavior and copresence on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandolfi, E. (2016). To watch or to play, it is in the game: The game culture on Twitch.tv among performers, plays and audiences. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 8(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.8.1.63_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genova, V. (2018). LoL world championship draws more viewers than the super bowl. Dexerto. Retrieved July 30, 2020 from https://www.dexerto.com/esports/lol-world-championship-draws-more-viewers-than-the-super-bowl-209502
   Google Scholar
• Glickman, S., McKenzie, N., Seering, J., Moeller, R., & Hammer, J. (2018). Design challenges for livestreamed audience participation games. CHI PLAY 2018 – Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on Twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ‘14, 1315–1324.
   Google Scholar
• Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. R., & Woodcock, J. (2019). The impacts of live streaming and Twitch.tv on the video game industry. Media, Culture & Society, 41(5), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, R. S. (2008). The mediation of ritual interaction via the mobile telephone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 165–176). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, P. (2013). Online networks and emotional energy: How pro-anorexic websites use interaction ritual chains to (re)form identity. Information, Communication & Society, 16(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.659197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. (2015). You may know me from YouTube: (Micro-)celebrity in social media. In P. D. Marshall, & S. Redmond (Eds.), A companion to celebrity. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475089.ch18
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESH (The [Norwegian] National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities). (2018). A guide to internet research ethics. NESH.
   Google Scholar
• Newzoo. (2020). Global games market report 2020. Retrieved July 27, 2020, from https://newzoo.com/insights/trend-reports/newzoo-global-games-market-report-2020-light-version/
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, A. (2019). Fame and ‘Fortnite’ – Inside the global gaming phenomenon. Financial Times. Retrieved April 12, 2020, from https://www.ft.com/content/f2103e72-b38f-11e9-bec9-fdcab53d6959
   Google Scholar
• Recktenwald, D. (2017). Toward a transcription and analysis of live streaming on Twitch. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seering, J., Kraut, R. E., & Dabbish, L. (2017a). Shaping pro and anti-social behavior on Twitch through moderation and example-setting. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Seering, J., Savage, S., Eagle, M., Churchin, J., Moeller, R., Bigham, J. P., & Hammer, J. (2017b). Audience participation games: Blurring the line between player and spectator. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064732
   Google Scholar
• Senft, T. M. (2013). Microcelebrity and the branded self. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch22
   Google Scholar
• Song, H. (2018). The making of microcelebrity: AfreecaTV and the younger generation in neoliberal South Korea. Social Media + Society, 4(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118814906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L. (2018). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohn, D. Y., Freeman, G., & McLaughlin, C. (2018). Explaining viewers’ emotional, instrumental, and financial support provision for live streamers. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174048
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2019). The affective labor and performance of live streaming on Twitch.tv. Television & New Media, 20(8), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419851077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar