6,729
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Selling internet control: the framing of the Russian ban of messaging app Telegram

ORCID Icon
Pages 2190-2206 | Received 26 Nov 2019, Accepted 04 May 2021, Published online: 31 May 2021

References

  • Akbari, A., & Gabdulhakov, R. (2019). Platform surveillance and resistance in Iran and Russia: The case of Telegram. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12928
  • BBC Russian. (2019, March 10). V Moskve proshel miting protiv izoliatsii runeta. bbc.com/russian/news-47514303
  • Borenstein, E. (2019). Plots against Russia: Conspiracy and fantasy after socialism. Cornell University Press.
  • Burgess, M. (2018, April 28). This is why Russia's attempts to block Telegram have failed. WIRED. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/telegram-in-russia-blocked-web-app-ban-facebook-twitter-google
  • Churakova, O., Mukhametshina, E., & Ser’gina, E. (2017, September 24). V Kremle i FSB zanialis’ monitoringom telegram-kanalov. Vedomosti. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/09/24/735092-kremle-fsb-telegram-kanalov
  • Claessen, E. (2020). Reshaping the internet – the impact of the securitisation of internet infrastructure on approaches to internet governance: The case of Russia and the EU. Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(1), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1728356
  • Crow, D. A., & Lawlor, A. (2016). Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences. Review of Policy Research, 33(5), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12187
  • Daucé, F., Loveluck, B., Ostromooukhova, B., & Zaytseva, A. (2019). From citizen investigators to cyber patrols: Volunteer internet regulation in Russia. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research, 11(3), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2019-11-3-46-70
  • Deibert, R., & Rohozinski, R. (2010). Control and subversion in Russian cyberspace. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinski, & J. Zittrain (Eds.), Access controlled: The shaping of power, rights, and rule in cyberspace (pp. 15–34). MIT Press.
  • Durov, P. (2018, March 22). 200,000,000 monthly active users. https://telegram.org/blog/200-million
  • Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Ermoshina, K., & Musiani, F. (2017). Migrating servers, elusive users: Reconfigurations of the Russian internet in the post-Snowden era. Media and Communication, 5(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.816
  • Gabdulhakov, R. (2020). (Con)trolling the web: Social media user arrests, state-supported vigilantism and citizen counter-forces in Russia. Global Crime, 21(3–4), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2020.1719836
  • Gelman, V. (2015). Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing post-Soviet regime changes. University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Kolomychenko, M. (2018, April 20). FSB reshila blokirovat’ Telegram iz-za planov Durova sozdat’ kriptovaliutu. RBK. https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/20/04/2018/5ad8c53a9a7947ec8d8c1ed5
  • Konobeevskaia, N. (2016, November 18). Rossiiane stali men’she doveriat’ televideniiu. RBK. from http://www.rbc.ru/politics/18/11/2016/582dc27f9a794723c3f3a270
  • Kurowska, X., & Reshetnikov, A. (2018). Neutrollization: Industrialized trolling as a pro-Kremlin strategy of desecuritization. Security Dialogue, 49(5), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618785102
  • Kurowska, X., & Reshetnikov, A. (2021). Trickstery: Pluralising stigma in international society. European Journal of International Relations, 27(1), 232–257.
  • Lehtisaari, K. (2020). Formation of media policy in Russia: The case of the Iarovaia law. In M. Wijermars, & K. Lehtisaari (Eds.), Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere (pp. 57–73). Routledge.
  • Levada Center. (2016, November 18). Doverie SMI i tsenzura. http://www.levada.ru/2016/11/18/doverie-smi-i-tsenzura/
  • Li, I., Nemchenko, I., & Balashova, A. (2018, April 23). Doguglilis’: kak servis postradal iz-za bor’by Roskomnadzora s Telegram.. RBK. https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/23/04/2018/5addce179a79476dc5d719fb
  • Lokot, T. (2018a). Be safe or be seen? How Russian activists negotiate visibility and security in online resistance practices. Surveillance & Society, 16(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i3.6967
  • Lokot, T. (2018b, November 26). Telegram: What’s in an app? Point & Counterpoint, PONARS Eurasia. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/point-counter/telegram-whats-app
  • Lokot, T. (2020). Data subjects vs. people’s data: Competing discourses of privacy and power in modern Russia. Media and Communication, 8(2), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2883
  • Lonkila, M., Shpakovskaya, L., & Torchinsky, P. (2020). The occupation of Runet? The tightening state regulation of the Russian-language section of the Internet. In M. Wijermars, & K. Lehtisaari (Eds.), Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere (pp. 17–38). Routledge.
  • Nisbet, E. C. (2015). Benchmarking public demand: Russia’s appetite for Internet control. Internet Policy Observatory. https://global.asc.upenn.edu/app/uploads/2015/02/Russia-Public-Opinion.pdf
  • Nisbet, E. C., Kamenchuk, O., & Dal, A. (2017). A psychological firewall? Risk perceptions and public support for online censorship in Russia. Social Science Quarterly, 98(3), 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12435
  • Nocetti, J. (2015). Russia's ‘dictatorship-of-the-law’ approach to internet policy. Internet Policy Review, 4(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.4.380
  • Pigman, L. (2019). Russia’s vision of cyberspace: A danger to regime security, public safety, and societal norms and cohesion. Journal of Cyber Policy, 4(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2018.1546884
  • Reuters. (2020, June 18). Russia lifts ban on Telegram messaging app after failing to block it. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-telegram-ban/russia-lifts-ban-on-telegram-messaging-app-after-failing-to-block-it-idUSKBN23P2FT
  • Rogers, R. (2020). Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922066
  • Shehabat, A., Mitew, T., & Alzoubi, Y. (2017) Encrypted Jihad: Investigating the role of Telegram app in lone wolf attacks in the West. Journal of Strategic Security, 10(3), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.10.3.1604
  • Shen, F. (2017). Internet use, freedom supply, and demand for Internet freedom: A cross-national study of 20 countries. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2093–2114.
  • Sherstoboeva, E. (2020). Regulation of online freedom of expression in Russia in the context of the Council of Europe standards. In S. Davydov (Ed.), Internet in Russia: A study of the runet and its impact on social life (pp. 83–100). Springer.
  • Sivetc, L. (2020). The blacklisting mechanism: New-school regulation of online expression and its technological challenges. In M. Wijermars, & K. Lehtisaari (Eds.), Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere (pp. 39–56). Routledge.
  • Sobolev, S., & Maliarenko, E. (2019, April 13). Za god blokirovki Telegram ostalsia v troike samykh poluliarnykh messendzerov. RBK. https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/13/04/2019/5cb19f339a794741a319f84d
  • Soldatov, O. (2019). Half-hearted inception, miserable existence, and the untimely death of the bloggers’ register in Russia. Israel Law Review, 52(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223718000250
  • State Duma. (2017, April 10). Zakonoproekt No. 145507-7 ‘O pravovom regulirovanii deiatel’nosti sotsial’nykh setei i o vnesenii izmenenii v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii’. https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/145507-7
  • Tolz, V., & Teper, Y. (2018). Broadcasting agitainment: A new media strategy of Putin’s third presidency. Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(4), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1459023
  • Van der Vet, F. (2020). Imprisioned for a ‘like’: The criminal prosecution of social media users under authoritarianism. In M. Wijermars, & K. Lehtisaari (Eds.), Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere (pp. 209–224). Routledge.
  • Veen, J., & Boeke, S. (2020). No backdoors: Investigating the Dutch standpoint on encryption. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.233
  • Volkov, D., & Goncharov, S. (2020). Rossiiskii medialandshaft – 2020. Levada Center. https://www.levada.ru/2020/04/28/rossijskij-medialandshaft-2020/
  • VTsIOM. (2017, April 10). Press-vypusk no. 3347. Zabanit’ sotsseti?. https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116150
  • Wijermars, M. (2020a). Memory politics in contemporary Russia: Television, cinema and the state. Routledge.
  • Wijermars, M. (2020b). The stakes are high for Internet freedom in Russia in 2020. Baltic Rim Economies, (1), 41.
  • Wijermars, M. (2021). Russia's law 'On news aggregators': Control the news feed, control the news? Journalism. doi:10.1177/1464884921990917
  • Wijermars, M., & Lehtisaari, K. (2020a). Introduction: Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere. In M. Wijermars & K. Lehtisaari (Eds.), Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
  • Yablokov, I. (2015). Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT). Politics, 35(3–4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12097
  • Yablokov, I. (2018). Fortress Russia: Conspiracy theories in post-Soviet Russia. Polity Press.