Nodes of certainty and spaces for doubt in AI ethics for engineers

References

• AI HLEG (High-Level Expert Group on Artifical Intelligence). (2019). A definition of Artificial Intelligence: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Nordic Engineers [ANE]. (2018). Nordic engineers’ stand on Artificial Intelligence and ethics report. https://ipaper.ipapercms.dk/IDA/ane/report/
   Google Scholar
• Association of Nordic Engineers [ANE]. (2021). Addressing ethical dilemmas in AI: Listening to engineers. https://nordicengineers.org/2021/01/listen-to-the-engineers/
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a Philosophy of the Act. (V. Liapunov, Ed., & M. Holquist, Trans.), Univ. Of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (ca 1920). Автор и герой в эстетической деятельности. [The Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity]. https://dustyattic.ru/articles/other-articles/author-and-hero/ author-and-hero-problem-of-relations
   Google Scholar
• Beaudouin, V., Bloch, I., Bounie, D., Clémençon, S., d’Alché-Buc, F., Eagan, J., Maxwell, W., Mozharovskyi, P., & Parekh, J. (2020). Flexible and context-specific AI explainability: A multidisciplinary approach. http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07703.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. (1981). The social control of technology. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies [EGE]. (2018). Statement on Artificial Intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous’ systems. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, C., Rauhala, M., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2017). In-action ethics. Interacting with Computers, 29(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B., & Viljoen, S. (2020, January 27–30). Algorithmic realism: Expanding the boundaries of algorithmic thought. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (FAccT 2020) (pp. 19–31). Association for Computing Machinery, Barcelona, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372840
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., & Stark, L. (2019, January 8–11). Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.258
   Google Scholar
• Groves, C. (2015). Logic of choice or logic of care? Uncertainty, technological mediation and responsible innovation. Nanoethics, Dordrecht 9(3), 321–333. http://ep.fjernadgang.kb.dk/10.1007/s11569-015-0238-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-015-0238-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2016). Accountable algorithms (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2765268). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2765268
   Google Scholar
• Lambek, M. J. (2010). Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action. Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampland, M., & Star, S. L. (Eds.). (2009). Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madaio, M. A., Stark, L., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2020, April 25–30). Co-Designing checklists to understand organizational challenges and opportunities around Fairness in AI. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing systems (pp. 1–14). Honolulu, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376445
   Google Scholar
• Mahieu, R., van Eck, N. J., van Putten, D., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). From dignity to security protocols: A scientometric analysis of digital ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9457-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, J., Moss, E., & Boyd, D. (2019). Owning ethics: Corporate logics, silicon valley, and the institutionalization of ethics. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 86(2), 449–476. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/732185
   Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
   Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, D. J., Mason, H., & Loukides, M. (2018, July 17). Of oaths and checklists. O'Reilly Media. https://www.oreilly.com/radar/of-oaths-and-checklists/
   Google Scholar
• Pillai, A. G., Baki Kocaballi, A., Wah Leong, T., Calvo, R. A., Parvin, N., Shilton, K., Waycott, J., Fiesler, C., Havens, J. C., & Ahmadpour, N. (2021, May 8–13). Co-designing resources for ethics education in HCI. 2021 ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2019). Ethics in an uncertain world: Between theory and practice. In S. Pink, V. Fors, & T. O’Dell (Eds.), Theoretical scholarship and applied practice (pp. 29–50). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04bkj.6.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, D., Biddle, J., Borenstein, J., & Laas, K. (2020, February 7–8). What’s next for AI ethics, policy, and governance? A global overview. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, ethics, and society (pp. 153–158). New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375804
   Google Scholar
• Sjørslev, I. (2017). Ritual infrastructure. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 35(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3167/cja.2017.350206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustek-Spilda, F., Powell, A., & Nemorin, S. (2019). Engaging with ethics in internet of things: Imaginaries in the social milieu of technology developers. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719879468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallor, S. (2011). Carebots and Caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philosophy & Technology, 24(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0015-x
   Google Scholar
• Weeden, K. A. (2002). Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 55–101. https://doi.org/10.1086/344121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: A roadmap for research. Nuffield Foundation. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Ethical-and-Societal-Implications-of-Data-and-AI-report-Nuffield-Foundat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, M. (2020, January 27–30). What to account for when accounting for algorithms: A systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT 2020) (pp. 1–18). Barcelona, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372833
   Google Scholar