Trump and circumstance: introducing the post-truth claim as an instrument for investigating truth contestation in public discourse

References

• Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H.2017). Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Conclusion: Populism and Twenty-First Century Western European democracy. In D. Albertazzi, & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-First Century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 217–224). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1972). Lying in politics. In Crises of the republic. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. (2011). How the media shape perceptions of right-wing populist leaders. Political Communication, 28(2), 182–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.564605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossio, D. (2017). Journalism and social media. Practitioners, organisations and institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brändle, V. K., Eisele, O., & Trenz, H.-J. (2019). Contesting European solidarity during the “Refugee crisis”: A comparative investigation of media claims in Denmark, Germany, Greece and Italy. Mass Communication and Society, 22(6), 708–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1674877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., & Vaccari, C. (2019). News sharing on UK social media: Misinformation, disinformation, and correction. Online Civic Culture Centre, Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Berger, J., Blumling, A., Brooks, K., Giorgi, E., Jackson, J., Lee, M., Nomura, S., O’Neill, L., Qian, S., & Wellman, M. (2019). Quantitative content analysis of Donald Trump’s Twitter, 2017–2019. University of Utah. https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/118603/version/V1/view;jsessionid=D259B202F43C258300771AEFC2F7F867
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic Crisis of democracy. Javnost - The Public, 25(1–2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I., & Rooduijn, M. (2021). The people’s champions? Populist communication as a contextually dependent political strategy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(3), 896–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699021998648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnová, A. (2019). Understanding emotions in post-factual politics. Negotiating Truth. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Egelhofer, J. L., Aaldering, L., & Lecheler, S. (2021). Delegitimizing the media? Analyzing politicians’ media criticism on social media. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20081.ege
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019). Populists prefer social media over talk shows: An analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across Six countries. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S., & Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable opportunity structures for populist communication: Comparing different types of politicians and issues in social media, television and the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhall, K., Carson, A., Wright, S., Gibbons, A., & Lukamto, W. (2019). Political elites' use of fake news discourse across communications platforms. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4353–4375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost - The Public, 25(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2020). Post-Truth, fake news and democracy. Mapping the politics of falsehood. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: On the social construction of alternative facts social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2019.1602067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroughi, H., Gabriel, Y., & Fotaki, M. (2019). Leadership in a post-truth era: A new narrative disorder? Leadership, 15(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019835369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. H., & Johnson, K. T. (2016). Twitter taunts and tirades: Negative campaigning in the Age of trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2020a). Augmenting polarization via social media? A comparative analysis of Trump’s and wilders’ online populist communication and the electorate’s interpretations surrounding the elections. Acta Politica, 55(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0119-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2020b). Populist disinformation: Exploring intersections between online populism and disinformation in the US and the Netherlands. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2021). Populist disinformation in fragmented information settings. Understanding the Nature and persuasiveness of populist and post-factual communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). “They Did It”: The effects of emotionalized blame Attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., & Minihold, S. (2020). Constructing discourses on (Un)truthfulness: Attributions of reality, misinformation, and disinformation by politicians in a comparative social media setting. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220982762
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J., & Rosamond, B. (2017). Post-truth politics, bullshit and bad ideas: ‘deficit fetishism’ in the UK. New Political Economy, 23(6), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1373757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluknavská, A., Bernhard, J., & Boomgaarden, H. (2021). Claiming the Crisis: Mediated public debates about the Refugee Crisis in Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Erbe, J. (2004). Towards a European public sphere? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161042000238643
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Journal, 4(1), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (2010). The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political contention. In The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political contention. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2018). How Journalism responds to right-wing populist criticism. In K. Otto, & A. Köhler (Eds.), Trust in media and journalism (pp. 137–154). Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Laybats, C., & Tredinnick, L. (2016). Post truth, information, and emotion. Business Information Review, 33(4), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382116680741
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindekilde, L. (2013). Claims-making. In D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The wiley-blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Maurer, P., & Arendt, F. (2019). Consequences of politicians’ perceptions of the news media. Journalism Studies, 20(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1377102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks, L. (2020). Defining the enemy: How Donald Trump frames the news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messias, J., Vikatos, P., & Benevenuto, F. (2017). White, man, and highly followed: Gender and race inequalities in twitter. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2017, 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106472
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. (2016). Word of the Year 2016 is … https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E. T., & Rand, D. G. (2020). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science, 66(11), 4944–4957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, K. (2021, 9 January). In Pulling Trump’s Megaphone, Twitter Shows Where Power Now Lies - The ability of a handful of people to control our public discourse has never been more obvious. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2021/01/09/technology/trump-twitter-ban.html
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2018). Discursive deflection: Accusation of “fake news” and the spread of mis- and disinformation in the tweets of president Trump. Social Media + Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, M. E. (2018). Post-truth, social media, and the “real” as phantasm. In Relativism and post-truth in contemporary society: Possibilities and challenges (pp. 55–69). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengul, K. (2019). Populism, democracy, political style and post-truth: Issues for communication research. Communication Research and Practice, 5(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1561399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shindler, M. (2019). In Defense of Government Shutdowns. The American Conservative.
   Google Scholar
• TandocJrE. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H. G., Strömbäck, J., Vliegenthart, R., Damstra, A., & Lindgren, E. (2020). Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: Literature review and synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1759443
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallaschek, S. (2020). Contested solidarity in the Euro crisis and Europe’s migration crisis: A discourse network analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(7), 1034–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1659844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. In Report to the Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2021). Extracting semantic relations using syntax: An R package for querying and researching dependency trees. Computational Communication Research, 3(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2021.2.003.WELB
   Google Scholar
• Wells, C., Shah, D., Lukito, J., Pelled, A., Pevehouse, J. C., & Yang, J. H. (2020). Trump, twitter, and news media responsiveness: A media systems approach. New Media and Society, 22(4), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirz, D. S. (2018). Persuasion through emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication International Journal of Communication, 12, 1114–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-wing populism in Europe & USA. Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘orbanism’ and ‘trumpism.’. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T. (2018). Populist knowledge: ‘post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5(4), 356–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2017.1414620
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass opinion. In The Nature and Origins of Mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar