7,444
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Digital platforms as socio-cultural artifacts: developing digital methods for cultural research

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1733-1755 | Received 05 Aug 2020, Accepted 29 Dec 2021, Published online: 30 Jan 2022

References

  • Allen, W. (2016). Campaign conversations on Instagram and the closure of access to social media data. SSRN 2907683.
  • Andreessen, M. (2007). Analyzing the Facebook platform, three weeks in. http://web.archive.org/web/20071021003047/blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/analyzing_the_f.html
  • Bainotti, L., Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2021). From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: Studying Instagram stories with digital methods. New Media & Society, 3(12), 3656–3676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820960071
  • Bogost, I., & Montfort, N. (2009). Platform studies: Frequently questioned answers. Digital arts and culture. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/01r0k9br.pdf
  • Bruns, A. (2007). Methodologies for mapping the political blogosphere: An exploration using the IssueCrawler research tool. First Monday, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i5.1834
  • Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1544–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447
  • Burgess, J., & Baym, N. K. (2020). Twitter: A biography. NYU Press.
  • Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Wiley.
  • Burgess, J., & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping sociocultural controversies across digital media platforms: One week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155338
  • Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2016). Qualitative research in digital environments: A research toolkit. Routledge.
  • Chan, A. (2013). Networking peripheries: Technological futures and the myth of digital universalism. MIT Press.
  • d’Andrea, C., & Mintz, A. (2019). Studying the live cross-platform circulation of images with computer vision API: An experiment based on a sports media event. International Journal of Communication, 13, 21.
  • de Oliveira Santos, M., & de Souza, J. B. (2020). Food as affection, comfort and refuge: understanding the act of eating in pandemic times. The Journal of the Food and Culture of the Americas, 2(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.35953/raca.v2i2.42
  • Driscoll, K., & Thorson, K. (2015). Searching and clustering methodologies: Connecting political communication content across platforms. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570570
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
  • Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). # Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
  • Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511560308. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080
  • Jurgens, D., Finethy, T., McCorriston, J., Xu, Y., & Ruths, D. (2015, April). Geolocation prediction in twitter using social networks: A critical analysis and review of current practice. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 9(1).
  • Kochhar, R. (2015, July). A global middle class is more promise than reality: From 2001 to 2011, nearly 700 million step out of poverty, but most only barely. Pew Research Center.
  • Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Sage.
  • Kravets, O., & Sandikci, O. (2014). Competently ordinary: New middle-class consumers in the emerging markets. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.12.0190
  • Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Wiley.
  • Lupton, D. (2014). Apps as artefacts: Towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. Societies, 4(4), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4040606
  • Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915574602
  • Marres, N., & Moats, D. (2015). Mapping controversies with social media: The case for symmetry. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511560417. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604176
  • Mayr, P., & Weller, K. (2017). Think before you collect. Setting up a data collection approach for social media studies. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (pp. 107–124). London: Sage.
  • Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the south(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
  • Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Berg.
  • Murthy, D. (2018). Twitter. Polity Press.
  • Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context. Stanford University Press.
  • Özkula, S. M., Reilly, P. J., & Hayes, J. (2022). Easy data, same old platforms? A systematic review of digital activism methodologies. Information, Communication & Society, 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013918
  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the world wide web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4), JCMC843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00223.x
  • Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871
  • Perriam, J., Birkbak, A., & Freeman, A. (2020). Digital methods in a post-API environment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1682840
  • Plantin, J. C., & De Seta, G. (2019). Wechat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1572633
  • Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380009
  • Rieder, B. (2015). The end of Netvizz?. http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2015/01/the-end-of-netvizz/
  • Rogers, R. (2019). Doing digital methods. Sage.
  • Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage.
  • Serafinelli, E. (2018). Digital life on Instagram: New social communication of photography. Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant tools. http://voyant-tools.org/
  • Steinberg, M., & Li, J. (2017). Introduction: Regional platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 4(3), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340076
  • Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
  • United Nations. (2022). Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. http://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal12
  • Venturini, T., Bounegru, L., Gray, J., & Rogers, R. (2018). A reality check(list) for digital methods. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4195–4217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769236
  • Venturini, T., Cardon, D., & Cointet, J. P. (2015). Méthodes digitales: Approches quali/quanti des données numériques-curation and presentation of the special issue. Réseaux, n° 188(6), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.188.0009
  • Venturini, T., & Latour, B. (2009). The social fabric: Digital traces and quali-quantitative methods
  • Venturini, T., & Rogers, R. (2019). “API-based research” or how can digital sociology and journalism studies learn from the Facebook and Cambridge analytica data breach. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1591927
  • Vicari, S. (2014). Networks of contention: The shape of online transnationalism in early twenty-first century social movement coalitions. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.832621
  • Vicari, S. (2017). Twitter and non-elites: Interpreting power dynamics in the life story of the (#)BRCA Twitter stream. Social Media+ Society, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117733224
  • Vicari, S., & Murru, M. F. (2020). One Platform, a Thousand Worlds: On Twitter Irony in the Early Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy. Social Media+ Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948254
  • Walker, S., Mercea, D., & Bastos, M. (2019). The disinformation landscape and the lockdown of social platforms. Information, Communication and Society, 22(11), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1648536
  • Wang, W. Y., & Lobato, R. (2019). Chinese video streaming services in the context of global platform studies. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1584119
  • Web Science Institute. (2022). Web Data Research Assistant. http://southampton.ac.uk/~lac/WebDataResearchAssistant/
  • Weller, K. (2015). Accepting the challenges of social media research. Online Information Review, 39(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2015-0069
  • Willems, W. (2020). Beyond platform-centrism and digital universalism: The relational affordances of mobile social media publics. Information, Communication & Society, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1718177