Personalization of politicians on Instagram: what Generation Z wants to see in political posts

References

• Al Nashmi, E. (2017). From selfies to media events: How Instagram users interrupted their routines after the Charlie Hebdo shootings. Digital Journalism, 6(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1306787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. (2019). 3 ad campaigns that resonated with the Gen Z audience. Adweek. Retrieved May 3, 2021, from https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/3-ad-campaignsthat-resonated-with-the-gen-z-audience/
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. W. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion, E. A., & Nickerson, D. W. (2016). I will register and vote, if you teach me how: A field experiment testing voter registration in college classrooms. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 867–871. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan, D. E., Carnahan, D., Lajevardi, N., Medeiros, M., Reckhow, S., & Thorson, K. (2021). Promoting the youth vote: The role of informational cues and social pressure. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09686-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. C., & Kim, J. (2018). The current state of knowledge on electronic word-of-mouth in advertising research. International Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1407061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Holbert, R. L. (2021). Assessing the predictive value of parasocial relationship intensity in a political context. Communication Research, 48(4), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218759446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
   Google Scholar
• Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffett, R. (2020). The YouTube marketing communication effect on cognitive, affective and behavioural attitudes among Generation Z consumers. Sustainability, 12, 5075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldin, A. K. (2016). Instagram’s role in influencing youth opinion in the 2015 election campaign in Bahrain. European Scientific Journal, 12, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n2p245.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, W. H. (2020). Now, more than half of Americans are millennials or younger. Brookings Institute. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/theavenue/2020/07/30/now-more-than-half-of-americans-are-millennials-or-younger/
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, S., Paravati, E., Green, M. C., & Folmsbee, J. (2018). From Apprentice to president: The role of parasocial connection in the election of Donald Trump. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., & Lunney, C. A. (2009). The influence of perceived social norms on college students’ intention to vote. Political Communication, 26(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802622860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. (2019). The most popular social media platforms with Gen Z. Business Insider. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.in/retail/the-most-popular-socialmedia-platforms-with-gen-z/articleshow/70044989.cms
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/socialmedia-update-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, L., & Vergeer, M. (2012). Personalization in e-campaigning: A cross-national comparison of personalization strategies used on candidate websites of 17 countries in EP elections 2009. New Media & Society, 15(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812457333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbein, J. B., & Hillygus, S. (2020). Making young voters: Converting civic attitudes into civic action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, N., & McHale, S. (2007). A practical guide to the e-mail interview. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1415–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilvington, D. (2021). The virtual stages of hate: Using Goffman’s work to conceptualise the motivations for online hate. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720972318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2019). Skiing all the way to the polls: Exploring the popularity of personalized posts on political Instagram accounts. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 25(5-6), 1096–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517741132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, J., Carlson, T., & Högväg, J. (2021). See me, like me! Exploring viewers’ visual attention to and trait perceptions of party leaders on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220937239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, T. (2019, April 23). The Instagram aesthetic is over. The look make famous by the platform just doesn’t resonate anymore. The Atlantic. Retrieved May 10, 2021, from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/04/influencers-are-abandoninginstagram-look/587803/
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, I. (2007). The personalization of politics. In R. J. Dalton & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 571–588). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C. (2018). Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paravati, E., Naidu, E., Gabriel, S., & Wiedemann, C. (2020). More than just a tweet: The unconscious impact of forming parasocial relationships through social media. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000214
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H., Davies, J., & McMahan, C. (2011). The rise of non-traditional site use for online political information. Communication Quarterly, 59(5), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.614211
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H., & Roman, N. (2019). Insta-politicos: Motivations for following political leaders on Instagram. Social Media + Society, April-June, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119837662.
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H., & Roman, N. (2020). The strength of no-tie relationships: Political leaders’ Instagram posts and their followers’ actions and views. First Monday, 25(9). https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/10886/9725
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018). Millennials are the largest generation in the U.S. labor force. Retrieved April 28, 2021, from https://www.pewresearchorg/topics/millennials/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020). On the cusp of adulthood and facing an uncertain future: What we know about Gen Z so far. Retrieved April 28, 2021, from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/05/14/on-the-cusp-of-adulthood-and facing-an-uncertain-future-what-we-know-about-gen-z-so-far-2/
   Google Scholar
• Pineda, A., Bellido-Pérez, E., & Barragán-Romero, A. I. (2020). “Backstage moments during the campaign”: The interactive use of Instagram by Spanish political leaders. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972390
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, G., & Shaefer, T. (2007). The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 24(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann, U., & Svensson, J. (2017). Interaction on Instagram? Glimpses from the 2014 Swedish elections. International Journal of E-Politics, 8(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2017010104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. R., & Sanderson, J. (2015). I'm going to Instagram It! An analysis of athlete self-presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffes, E. M., & Burgee, L. E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research, 19(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman, J. (2020). How to appeal to Gen Z on Instagram: Be weirder (and uglier). Inc. Retrieved May 10, 2021, from https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/how-to-appeal-to-gen-zon-instagram-be-weirder-and-uglier.html
   Google Scholar
• Tabassum, S., Khwaja, M. G., & Zaman, U. (2020). Can narrative advertisement and eWOW influence Generation Z purchase intentions? Information, 11(12), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120545
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. (2019). Instagram is Gen Z’s go-to source of political news – And it’s already having an impact on the 2020 election. Business Insider. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-gets-its-political-news-from-instagram-accounts2019-6
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N., Gismondi, A., Gautam, P., & Brinker, D. (2021). Democracy counts 2020: Record breaking turnout and student resiliency. Institute for Democracy & Higher Education. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://idhe.tufts.edu/nslve/2020
   Google Scholar
• Towner, T. L., & Muñoz, C. L. (2017). Picture perfect? The role of Instagram in issue agenda setting during the 2016 presidential primary campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317728222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromble, R. (2018). Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20(2), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2011). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar