978
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of E-Government website evaluation on user satisfaction and intention to use: the mediating role of warmth and competence judgment on government

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1868-1889 | Received 17 Sep 2021, Accepted 26 Jan 2022, Published online: 24 Feb 2022

References

  • Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1086/651566
  • Ahmad, A., Rahman, O., & Khan, M. N. (2017). Exploring the role of website quality and hedonism in the formation of e-satisfaction and e-loyalty. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 11(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2017-0022
  • Ambali, A. R. (2009). E-government policy: Ground issues in e-filing system. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 249–266. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228866981_E-Government_Policy_Ground_Issues_in_E-Filing_System.
  • Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.2.125
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bbulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chiu, C.-M., Chiu, C.-S., & Chang, H.-C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.x
  • Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2002). Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210419406
  • Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
  • Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., Bond, M. H., Croizet, J.-C., Ellemers, N., & Sleebos, E. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935
  • Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
  • Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/25632
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  • Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616
  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. (2004). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Grigoryev, D., Fiske, S. T., & Batkhina, A. (2019). Mapping ethnic stereotypes and their antecedents in russia: The stereotype content model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Welch, E. W. (2012). Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02532.x
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315585950
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Heald, D. (2003). Fiscal transparency: Concepts, measurement and UK practice. Public Administration, 81(4), 723–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00369.x
  • Hoegg, J., & Lewis, M. V. (2011). The impact of candidate appearance and advertising strategies on election results. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.5.895
  • Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., Hwang, M. Y., Kuo, Y. C., & Chen, J. S. (2017). Internet cognitive failure relevant to users' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.044
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2014). Usability and credibility of e-government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.002
  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
  • Kasiri, L. A., Cheng, K. T. G., Sambasivan, M., & Sidin, S. M. (2017). Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.007
  • Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.006
  • Khoo, S., Ha, H., & McGregor, S. L. (2017). Service quality and student/customer satisfaction in the private tertiary education sector in Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0121
  • Kim, J., Hong, S., Min, J., & Lee, H. (2011). Antecedents of application service continuance: A synthesis of satisfaction and trust. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(8), 9530–9542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.142
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., & Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 5(1), 63–76. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Factors-for-Successful-e%E2%80%91Government-Adoption%3A-a-Kumar-Mukerji/371758d479236eb17162a62fc1bccfb3ec9032fd.
  • Lee, B.-K., Park, J., Yun, T., & Rim, H. (2019). 사회적 배제가 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 평가에 미치는 효과: 고정관념 내용 모형(stereotype contents model)을 중심으로. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 20(4), 485–504. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE09278812 https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2019.20.4.485
  • Lee, T., Lee-Geiler, S., & Lee, B.-K. (2021). A validation of the modified democratic E-governance website evaluation model. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101616
  • Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, T. D. (2019). Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003
  • Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.005
  • Liu, S. Q., Bogicevic, V., & Mattila, A. S. (2018). Circular vs. Angular servicescape: “shaping” customer response to a fast service encounter pace. Journal of Business Research, 89, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.007
  • Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
  • Manoharan, A. P., Zheng, Y., & Melitski, J. (2017). Global comparative municipal e-governance: Factors and trends. International Review of Public Administration, 22(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2017.1292031
  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
  • Nunkoo, R., Teeroovengadum, V., Thomas, P., & Leonard, L. (2017). Integrating service quality as a second-order factor in a customer satisfaction and loyalty model. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 2978–3005. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2016-0610
  • Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.011
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-10632-001
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
  • R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
  • Ramsay, J. E., & Pang, J. S. (2017). Anti-immigrant prejudice in rising east Asia: A stereotype content and integrated threat analysis. Political Psychology, 38(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12312
  • Rezende, N. E. H., Moura, L. R. C., Vasconcelos, F. C. W., & Cunha, N. R. D. S. (2017). Proposition and test of a quality assessment extension WebQual model in Brazil. Review of European Studies, 9(2), 74–90. http://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n2p74
  • Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2017). Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001
  • Santos, J. (2003). E-service quality: A model of virtual service quality dimensions. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310476490
  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
  • Sung, Y., & Kim, J. (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology and Marketing, 27(7), 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20349
  • Toufaily, E., & Pons, F. (2017). Impact of customers’ assessment of website attributes on e-relationship in the securities brokerage industry: A multichannel perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.011
  • United Nations. (2018). E-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. https://www.unescap.org/resources/e-government-survey-2018-gearing-e-government-support-transformation-towards-sustainable.
  • Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004
  • Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10196780232024592 https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929
  • Wortman, J., & Wood, D. (2011). The personality traits of liked people. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.006
  • Zheng, Y., Zhao, K., & Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 56, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.