You make me feel … autonomous or controlled: A mixed-method study on for- and non-profit platform organizations

References

• Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2020). Managing by data: Algorithmic categories and organizing. Organization Studies, 42(9), 1385–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620934062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ales, E., Curzi, Y., Fabbri, T., Rymkevich, O., Senatori, I., & Solinas, G. (2018). Working in digital and smart organizations. Legal, economic and organizational perspectives on the digitalization of labour relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. (2003). On the phenomenology of technology: The “janus-faces” of mobile phones. Information and Organization, 13(4), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-7727(03)00013-7
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V., & Kaiser, S. (2017). Autonomy and control? How heterogeneous sociomaterial assemblages explain paradoxical rationalities in the digital workplace. Management Revue, 28(3), 338–358.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2021). Platform capitalism: A socio-economic analysis. Socio-Economic Review, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braesemann, F., Lehdonvirta, V., & Kässi, O. (2022). Icts and the urban-rural divide: Can online labour platforms bridge the gap? Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 34–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. W. (1974). Labour and monopoly capital. The degradation of work in the twentieth sentury.. Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brey, P. (1999). Worker autonomy and the drama of digital networks in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006199816737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent. changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. (2020). The Rise of Algorithmic Work: Implications for Organizational Control and Worker Autonomy. University of Michigan. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/155277
   Google Scholar
• Cant, C. (2020). Riding for deliveroo: Resistance in the new economy. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curchod, C., Giamporcaro, S., & Kuk, G. (2021). Consent and dissent among platform-based workers: How symbolism steers Uber drivers’ motivation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021(1), 14528. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.14528abstract
   Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L., Morganti, E., Arvidsson, N., Woxenius, J., Browne, M., & Saidi, N. (2017). The rise of on-demand ‘instant deliveries’ in European cities. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 18(4), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2017.1375375
   Google Scholar
• Dale, S. (2014). Gamification: Making work fun, or making fun of work? Business Information Review, 31(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114538350
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. R., Cretella, A., & Franck, V. (2019). Food sharing initiatives and food democracy: Practice and policy in three European cities. Politics and Governance, 7(4), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). University Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R., & Jegers, M. (2011). A cross-sector comparison of motivation-related concepts in for-profit and not-for-profit service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009342897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time” workforce: on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the gig-economy. ILO Conditions of Work and Employment Series 71. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_protect/—protrav/—travail/documents/publication/wcms_443267.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. (2020). Making gigs work: Digital platforms, job quality and worker motivations. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35, 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. (1979). Contested terrain. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuele, R., & Higgins, S. H. (2000). Corporate culture in the nonprofit sector: A comparison of fringe benefits with the for-profit sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006215031400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlich, M. (2020). Misclassification in construction: The original gig economy. ILR Review, 74(5), 1202–1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920972321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (1998). Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 358–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galière, S. (2020). When food-delivery platform workers consent to algorithmic management: A foucauldian perspective. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganglbauer, E., Fitzpatrick, G., Subasi, Ö., & Güldenpfennig, F. (2014). Think globally, act locally: a case study of a free food sharing community and social networking. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ‘14), February, 15-19th, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, C. (2020). Community building on crowdwork platforms: Autonomy and control of online workers? Competition & Change, 25(2), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420914472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. (2011). Work's intimacy. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019). Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5), https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119870041
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafermalz, E. (2020). Out of the panopticon and into exile: Visibility and control in distributed new culture organizations. Organization Studies, 42(5), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620909962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (2010). Renewing and revising the engagement between labour process theory and technology. In P. Thompson, & C. Smith (Eds.), Working life: Renewing labour process analysis (pp. 159–181). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, D. (2021). On the (mis)classification of paid labor: When should gig workers have employee status?. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 20, 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X211015467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, T., & McCrystal, S. (2022). The importance of competition and consumer law in regulating gig work and beyond. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(3), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211068868
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., Smith, A., Goulding, J., & Illodo, I. B. (2019). Food sharing, redistribution, and waste reduction via mobile applications: A social network analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Pekarek, A. (2017). Should we take the gig economy seriously? Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 27(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2017.1377048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, J., Pekarek, A., & Vromen, A. (2020). Sceptics or supporters? Consumers’ views of work in the gig economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiland, H. (2021). Controlling space, controlling labour? Contested space in food delivery gig work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. (2022). Algorithmic management in food-delivery platform economy in China. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, S., & Stuart, M. (2021). Digitalised management, control and resistance in platform work: A labour process analysis. In J. Haidar, & M. Keune (Eds.), Work and labour relations in global platform capitalism (pp. 158–184). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Karanović, J., Berends, H., & Engel, Y. (2021). Regulated dependence: Platform workers’ responses to new forms of organizing. Journal of Management Studies, 58(4), 1070–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimikia, H., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2021). Negative outcomes of ICT use at work: Meta-analytic evidence and the role of job autonomy. Internet Research, 31(1), 159–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumpp, M, & Ruiner, C. (2021). Digital supply chains and the human factor – a structured synopsis. In M Klumpp & C Ruiner (Eds.), Digital supply chains and the human factor (pp. 1–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kraan, K. O., Dhondt, S., Houtman, I. L. D., Batenburg, R. S., Kompier, M. A. J., & Taris, T. W. (2014). Computers and types of control in relation to work stress and learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.916351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, K. E., & Maleki, A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: Understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusk, K., & Bossen, C. (2022). Working with wolt: An ethnographic study of lenient algorithmic management on a food delivery platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(GROUP), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam, C. F., & Gurland, S. T. (2008). Self-determined work motivation predicts job outcomes, but what predicts self-determined work motivation? Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., & Dabbish, L. (2015). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. Association for Computing Machinery. https://wtf.tw/ref/lee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leete, L. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(4), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00129-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A. K. (2021). Beyond algorithmic control: Flexibility, intermediaries, and paradox in the on-demand economy. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmeyer, N., Schüßler, E., & Helfen, M. (2018). Can solidarity be organized “from below” in global supply chains? The case of ExChains. Industrielle Beziehungen, 25(4), 472–496.
   Google Scholar
• Makov, T., Shepon, A., Krones, J., Gupta, C., & Chertow, M. (2020). Social and environmental analysis of food waste abatement via the peer-to-peer sharing economy. Nature Communications, 11(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14899-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz-Costa, C., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2010). Workplace flexibility as an organizational response to the aging of the workforce: A comparison of nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 36(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488370903333645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Social Research, 1. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337–1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelini, L., Grieco, C., Ciulli, F., & Di Leo, A. (2020). Uncovering the impact of food sharing platform business models: A theory of change approach. British Food Journal, 122(5), 1437–1462. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2019-0422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelini, L., Principato, L., & Iasevoli, G. (2018). Understanding food sharing models to tackle sustainability challenges. Ecological Economics, 145, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohlmann, M., & Zalmanson, L. (2017). Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers’ autonomy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Montalban, M., Frigant, V., & Jullien, B. (2019). Platform economy as a new form of capitalism: A régulationist research programme. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(4), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. V., Upchurch, M., & Whittaker, X. (2018). Humans and machines at work: Monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalism. In P. V. Moore, M. Upchurch, & X. Whittaker (Eds.), Humans and machines at work: Monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalism (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, O. (2019). Community self-organizing and the urban food commons in Berlin and New York. Sustainability, 11(13), 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, K., Richards, J., & Sang, K. (2021). Job quality, fair work and gig work: The lived experience of gig workers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(19), 4110–4135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1867612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newlands, G. (2021). Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies, 42(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander, P., Jukic, N., Varma, A., & Nestorov, S. (2021). The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: Organizational control and motivation of uber, taxi, and limousine drivers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(19), 4053–4077. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1867614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2016). Digital work: A research agenda. In B. Czarniawska (Ed.), A research agenda for management and organization studies (pp. 88–96). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Zapata, O., Serrano Pascual, A., Álvarez-Hernández, G., & Castaño Collado, C. (2016). Knowledge work intensification and self-management: The autonomy paradox. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 10(2), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Pinsof, J. (2016). A new take on an old problem: Employee misclassification in the modern gig-economy. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 22(2). http://repository.law.umich.edu/mttlr/vol22/iss2
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. J., & van den Hooff, B. (2020). The complementarity of autonomy and control in mobile work. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1728200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., & Zietsma, C. (2018). Working for an app: Organizational boundaries, roles, and meaning of work in the “on-demand” economy. In L. Ringel, P. Hiller, & C. Zietsma (Eds.), Toward permeable boundaries of organizations? (pp. 195–225). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rombach, M., & Bitsch, V. (2015). Food movements in Germany: Slow food, food sharing, and dumpster diving. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 18(3), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiner, C. (2021). Voluntary work in digital contexts as gift exchange. Sustainability, 13(21), 12176. http://doi.org/10.3390/su132112176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiner, C., & Klumpp, M. (2022). Autonomy and new modes of control in digital work contexts – a mixed-methods study of driving professions in food logistics. Employee Relations, 44(4), 890–912. http://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2021-0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanes, K., & Stagl, S. (2019). Food waste fighters: What motivates people to engage in food sharing? Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1491–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildt, H. (2017). Big data and organizational design – the brave new world of algorithmic management and computer augmented transparency. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19(1), 23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2008). Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, G. (1998). The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 397–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. (2018). Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2954–2971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817738236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevchuk, A., Strebkov, D., & Davis, S. N. (2018). The autonomy paradox: How night work undermines subjective well-being of internet-based freelancers. ILR Review, 72(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918767114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slone, M. R., Black, T., & Smith-Tran, A. (2021). On the job, off the books: Organizing against worker misclassification in the neoliberal era. Critical Sociology, https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211058039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2015). Continuity and change in labor process analysis forty years after labor and monopoly capital. Labor Studies Journal, 40(3), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X15607154
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Thompson, P. (1998). Re-evaluating the labour process debate. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 19(4), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X98194002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, C., Stohl, M., & Leonardi, P. M. (2016). Managing opacity: Information visibility and the paradox of transparency in the digital age. International Journal of Communication, 10(1), 123–137.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis. Technology in Society, 65, 101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & Smith, C. (2009). Labour power and labour process: Contesting the marginality of the sociology of work. Sociology, 43(5), 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509340728
   Google Scholar
• Ticona, J. (2015). Strategies of control: Workers’ use of ICTs to shape knowledge and service work. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020). Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia, Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., Cram, W., & Benlian, A. (2021). Algorithmic control and gig workers: A legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. European Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2018). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J. (2020). The algorithmic panopticon at deliveroo: Measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control. Ephemera, 20. http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/algorithmic-panopticon-deliveroo-measurement-precarity-and-illusion-control
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. Sociological Review, 66(3), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117728620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar