The unhomed data subject: negotiating datafication in Latin America

References

• Akbari, A. (2020). Follow the thing: Data: Contestations over data from the global south. Antipode, 52(2), 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausloos, J., & Dewitte, P. (2018). Shattering one-way mirrors – data subject access rights in practice. International Data Privacy Law, 8(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreneche, C., Lombana Bermúdez, A., & Ramos Martín, J. (2021). Datificación en contextos de corrupción: Imaginarios sociotécnicos y prácticas de resistencia frente a sistemas antipobreza en Colombia. Palabra Clave, 24(3), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.3.4
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J., Lin, Y. W., & Goodale, P. (2016). Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows. Big Data and Society, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1992). The world and the home. Social Text, 31/32, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/466222
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman (1st edition). Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data Is colonizing human life and appropriating It for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L. (2019). Situating practices in datafication – from above and below. In H. C. Stephansen, & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen media and practice (1st ed., pp. 243–255). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351247375-18.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., Cruxên, I., Suárez Val, H., Martinez Cuba, A., García-Montes, M., Fumega, S., Suresh, H., & So, W. (2022). Feminicide and counterdata production: Activist efforts to monitor and challenge gender-related violence. Patterns, 3(7), 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flore, J. (2021). Ingestible sensors, data, and pharmaceuticals: Subjectivity in the era of digital mental health. New Media & Society, 23(7), 2034–2051. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820931024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou, A. (2019). Understanding citizen data practices from a feminist perspective. In H. C. Stephansen, & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen media and practice (1st ed., pp. 227–242). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351247375-17.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Canclini, N. (2019). Ciudadanos reemplazados por algoritmos. CALAS.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, A. L. (2021). Terms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3539–3556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliadis, A., & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171667423. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurisica, I., Mylopoulos, J., & Yu, E. (2004). Ontologies for knowledge management: An information systems perspective. Knowledge and Information Systems, 6(4), 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-003-0135-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. (2018). Living with data: Aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. P. (2014). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. In J. Eckert, A. Shears, & J. Thatcher (Eds.), Geoweb and Big data. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty. ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2006). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehuedé, S. (2022). Territories of data: Ontological divergences in the growth of data infrastructure. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1), 2035936. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2035936
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2021). Not the real Me’: Social imaginaries of personal data profiling. Cultural Sociology, 15(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520939779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Barbero, J., & Rincón, O. (2019). Mapa insomne 2017: Ensayos sobre el sensorium contemporáneo. Un mapa para investigar la mutación cultural. In O. Rincón (Ed.), Un nuevo mapa para investigar la mutación cultural: Diálogo con la propuesta de Jesús Martín-Barbero (pp. 17–23). Ediciones Ciespal.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Barbero, J. (2002). Oficio de cartógrafo. Travesías latinoamericanas de la comunicación en la cultura. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Barbero, J. (2004). A nocturnal map to explore a new field. In A. Del Sarto, A. Ríos, & A. Trigo (Eds.), The Latin American cultural studies reader (pp. 310–328). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822385462-017
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, T., & Chow, L. Z. (2023). Data by design: Shaping data-producing subjectivities through self-tracking. The Information Society, 39(4), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2203151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), https://policyreview.info/concepts/datafication
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2016). Data activism as the new frontier of media activism. In G. Yang, & V. Pickard (Eds.), Shaping inquiry in culture, communication and media studies series (pp. 151–163).
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2019). Acting on data (fication). In H. C. Stephansen, & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen media and practice (1st ed., pp. 212–226). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351247375-16.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the south(s): beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, S. (2009). La apropiación de TIC: una perspectiva. In S. Morales, & M. I. Loyola (Eds.), Los jóvenes y las TIC. Apropiación y uso en educación (pp. 36–45). Copy-­Rápido.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D., & Beijnon, B. (2023). The data subject and the myth of the ‘black box’ - data communication and critical data literacy as a resistant practice to platform exploitation. Information, Communication & Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2205504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada, J. (2022). Embedded reproduction in platform data work. Information, Communication & Society, 25(6), 816–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2049849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyntz, S. R., Frau-Meigs, D., Hoechsmann, M., Kotilainen, S., & Pathak-Shelat, M. (2020). Introduction: Media education research in a rapidly changing media environment. In D. Frau-Meigs, S. Kotilainen, M. Pathak-Shelat, M. Hoechsmann, & S. R. Poyntz (Eds.), The handbook of media education research (1st ed., pp. 1–16). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166900.ch0.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, K., Febres-Cordero, B., Morales, E., Albornoz, D., Morachimo, M., & Flores, M. (2020). Son Mis Datos: Guía metodológica. Hiperederecho. https://hiperderecho.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/SonMisDatos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, K, & Morales, E. (2023). Citizen data audits in the Contemporary Sensorium. International Journal of Communication, 17, 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricaurte, P. (2022). Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221099612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivoir, A., & Reilly, K. (2023). Elder people and personal data: New challenges in health platformization. Media and Communication, 11(3). http://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruíz, E. (2017). Framing intersectionality. In P. Taylor, L. Alcoff, & L. Anderson (Eds.), The routledge companion to the philosophy of race (pp. 335–348). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J., & Pangrazio, L. (2021). The death of the educative subject? The limits of criticality under datafication. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(12), 2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1978072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura, M. S., & Waisbord, S. (2019). Between data capitalism and data citizenship. Television & New Media, 20(4), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419834519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., & Pangrazio, L. (2018). Doing data differently? Developing personal data tactics and strategies amongst young mobile media users. Big Data & Society, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718765021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles, I. (2023). Living with algorithms: Agency and user culture in Costa Rica. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siles, I., Espinoza-Rojas, J., Naranjo, A., & Tristán, M. F. (2019). The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. Communication, Culture and Critique, 12, 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles, I., Gómez-Cruz, E., & Ricaurte, P. (2023). Fluid agency in relation to algorithms: Tensions, mediations, and transversalities. Convergence, 0(0), https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231174586
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnreich, A., & Gilbert, J. (2019). The carrier wave principle. International Journal of Communication, 2019(13), 5816–5840.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. (2022). Extract, datafy and disrupt: Refugees’ subjectivities between data abundance and data disregard. Geopolitics, 27(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1822332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Mahmoudi, D. (2016). Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816633195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & Waal, M. d. (2018). The platform society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. M. (2019). Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Business & Society, 58(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, P. T. J. (2018). The control by and rights of the data subject under the GDPR. Journal of Internet Law, 22(1), 6–18.
   Google Scholar