‘Value talk’ in social work research: reflection, rhetoric and reality

References

• Ashenden S (1999) ‘Habermas on discursive consensus: rethinking the welfare state in the face of cultural pluralism’ in Welfare and Culture in Europe. Towards a New Paradigm in Social Policy eds P. Chamberlayne, A. Cooper, R. Freeman & M. Rustin Jessica Kingsley Publishers London
   Google Scholar
• Banks S (1995) Ethics and Values in Social Work, Macmillan London
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M (1997) Care, Communities and Citizens, Longman London
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib S (1991) Situating the Self, Routledge New York
   Google Scholar
• Beresford P (2000) ‘Service users’ knowledge and social work theory: conflict or collaboration’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 30 no. 4 pp. 489–504
   Google Scholar
• Beresford P Evans C (1999) ‘Research note: research and empowerment’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 29 no. 5 pp. 671–677
   Google Scholar
• Braaten J (1995) ‘From communicative rationality to communicative thinking: a basis for feminist theory and practice’ in Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse ed J. Meehan Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Braye S Preston-Shoot M (1995) Empowering Practice in Social Care, Open University Press Buckingham
   Google Scholar
• Butler I (2002) ‘A code of ethics for social work and social care research’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 32 no. 2 pp. 239–248
   Google Scholar
• Butler I (2003) ‘Doing good research and doing it well: ethical awareness and the production of social work research’ Social Work Education vol. 22 no. 1 pp. 19–30
   Google Scholar
• Chambers S (1995) ‘Feminist discourse/practical discourse’ in Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse ed J. Meehan Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham J (1998) ‘The evaluation of social work: priorities, problems and possibilities’ in The Working of Social Work eds J. Cheetham & M. Katz Jessica Kingsley London
   Google Scholar
• Clark C (2000) Social Work Ethics: Politics, Principles and Practice, Macmillan London
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2001) Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care http://www.doh.gov.uk/research.htlm
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli L (2002) ‘Values in social work: contested entities with enduring qualities’ in Critical Practice in Social Work eds R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne Palgrave Basingstoke
   Google Scholar
• Drucker D (2003) ‘Whither international social work?’ International Social Work vol. 46 no. 1 pp. 53–81
   Google Scholar
• Everitt A Hardiker P (1996) Evaluating for Good Practice, Macmillan London
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett B Featherstone B (1998) ‘Quality assurance and evaluation in social work in a postmodern era’ in Postmodernity and the Fragmentation of Welfare ed J. Carter Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L (2002) ‘Reflexivity in research and practice’ Qualitative Research vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 209–230
   Google Scholar
• Fisher M (1999) ‘Social work research, social work knowledge and the research assessment exercise’ in The Politics of Social Work Research and Evaluation ed B. Broad Venture Press Birmingham
   Google Scholar
• Fook J (2001) ‘Identifying expert social work: qualitative practitioner research’ in Qualitative Research in Social Work eds I. Shaw & N. Gould Sage London
   Google Scholar
• GSCC (2002) Codes of Practice http://www.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs A (2001) ‘The changing nature and context of social work research’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 31 no. 5 pp. 687–704
   Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1994) ‘Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state’ in Multiculturalism ed A. Gutman Princeton University Press Princeton NJ
   Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Polity Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Howe D (1996) ‘Surface and depth in social work practice’ in Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work ed N. Parton Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Humphries , B . (1997) . ‘From critical thought to emancipatory action: contradictory research goals?’ . Sociological Research Online , vol. 2 ( no. 1 ) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/1/3.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries B (2003) ‘What else counts as evidence in evidence-based social work?’ Social Work Education vol. 22 no. 1 pp. 81–91
   Google Scholar
• Husband C (1995) ‘The morally active practitioner and the ethics of anti-racist social work’ in Ethical Issues in Social Work eds R. Hugman & D. Smith Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• IASSW (2001) International Definition of Social Work http://www.iassw.soton.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• IFSW (2002) Second Draft Ethical Principles and Standards http://www.ifsw.org/GM-2004/GM-Ethics-2draft.htlm
   Google Scholar
• Lishman , J . (2000) . ‘Evidence for practice: the contribution of competing research methodologies’ . Theorising Social Work Research Seminar Series Seminar , 4 http://www.elsc.org.uk/socialcareresources/tswr/lishman.html
   Google Scholar
• Lister R (1998) ‘Citizenship on the margins: citizenship, social work and social action’ European Journal of Social Work vol. 1 pp. 5–18
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz W (1994) Social Work in a Changing Europe, Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz W (1999) ‘Social work and cultural politics’ in Welfare and Culture in Europe. Towards a New Paradigm in Social Policy eds P. Chamberlayne, A. Cooper, R. Freeman & M. Rustin Jessica Kingsley Publishers London
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz W (2000) ‘Contentious identities—social work research and the search for professional and personal identities’ Theorising Social Work Research Seminar Series Seminar 4 http://www.elsc.org.uk/socialcareresources/tswr/lorenz.html
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz W (2003) ‘European experiences in teaching social work research’ Social Work Education vol. 22 no. 1 pp. 7–18
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Brawley E (2001) ‘Searching again and again, inclusion, heterogeneity and social work research’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 31 pp. 271–285
   Google Scholar
• Mayer JE Timms N (1970) The Client Speaks: Working Class Impressions of Casework, Routledge and Kegan Paul London
   Google Scholar
• Midgley J (2001) ‘Issues in international social work: resolving critical debates in the profession’ Journal of Social Work vol. 1 no. 1 pp. 21–35
   Google Scholar
• Owen D (1999) ‘Political philosophy in a post-imperial voice: James Tully and the politics of cultural recognition’ Economy and Society vol. 28 no. 1 pp. 520–549
   Google Scholar
• Parton N (2000) ‘Some thoughts on the relationship between theory and practice in and for social work’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 30 no. 4 pp. 449–504
   Google Scholar
• Philp M (1979) ‘Notes on the form of knowledge in social work’ Sociological Review vol. 27 no. 1 pp. 83–111
   Google Scholar
• Postle K (2002) ‘Working “between the idea and the reality”: ambiguities and tensions in care managers’ work’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 32 no. 3 pp. 335–351
   Google Scholar
• Powell J (2000) ‘Accountability and social work research’ in Reclaiming Social Work: The Southport Papers Volume 2 eds J. Harris & I. Paylor Venture Press Birmingham
   Google Scholar
• Powell J (2002) ‘The changing conditions of social work research’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 32 no. 1 pp. 17–33
   Google Scholar
• Rees S (1991) Achieving Power: Practice and Policy in Social Welfare, Allen and Unwin Sydney Australia
   Google Scholar
• Rees S (1992) ‘The impact of consumer based research and the importance of its dissemination for education and practice’ Issues in Social Work Education vol. 12 no. 1 pp. 69–83
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds S (2000) ‘The anatomy of evidence-based practice: principles and methods’ in Evidence-based Practice—A Critical Appraisal eds L. Trinder with & S. Reynolds Blackwell Science Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter A Prilleltensky I Walsh-Bowers R (2000) ‘A postmodern perspective on professional ethics’ in Practice and Research in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspective eds B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook & A. Rossiter Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Sanders R (2003) ‘Medical research ethics committees and social work research: a hurdle too far?’ Social Work Education vol. 22 no. 1 pp. 113–114
   Google Scholar
• Social Research Association (1985) Ethical Guidelines http://www.the-sra.org.uk/ethics.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stanley N (1999) ‘User–practitioner transactions in the new culture of community care’ British Journal of Social Work vol. 29 no. 3 pp. 417–435
   Google Scholar
• Stanley L Wise S (1993) Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology, Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• TSWR (1999/2000) Theorising Social Work Research Seminar Series http://www.elsc.org.uk/socialcareresources/tswr/index.htlm
   Google Scholar
• Timms N (1983) Social Work Values: An Enquiry, Routledge and Kegan Paul London
   Google Scholar
• Timms N (1989) ‘Social work values: context and contribution’ in The Values of Change in Social Work ed S. Shardlow Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Trevillion S (1999) ‘On being a social worker. Globalization and the new subjectivities’ in Welfare and Culture in Europe. Towards a New Paradigm in Social Policy eds P. Chamberlayne, A. Cooper, R. Freeman & M. Rustin Jessica Kingsley Publishers London
   Google Scholar
• Trinder L (2000a) ‘Reading the texts: postmodern feminism and the “doing” of research’ in Practice and Research in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspectives eds B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook & A. Rossiter Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Trinder L (2000b) ‘A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice’ in Evidence-based Practice—A Critical Appraisal eds L. Trinder with & S. Reynolds Blackwell Science Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Truman , C . (2003) . ‘Ethics and the ruling relations of research production’ . Sociological Research Online , vol. 8 ( no. 1 ) http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/8/1/1.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully J (1995) Strange Multiplicities: Constitutionalism in the Age of Diversity, Cambridge University Press Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Tully J (1999) ‘The agonic freedom of citizens’ Economy and Society vol. 28 no. 2 pp. 161–182
   Google Scholar
• Wallace E Rees S (1988) ‘The priority of client evaluations’ in Evaluation. Research Highlights in Social Work ed J. Lishman vol. 8 2nd edn Jessica Kingsley Publishers London
   Google Scholar
• Warnke G (1995) ‘Discourse ethics and feminist dilemmas of difference’ in Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse ed J. Meehan Routledge London
   Google Scholar
• Williams F Popay J Oakley A (1999) Welfare Research: A Critical Review, UCL Press London
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot S (1997) The Ethics of Community Care, Cassell London
   Google Scholar
• Young I (1997) ‘Asymmetrical reciprocity: on moral respect, wonder and enlarged thought’ Constellations vol. 3 no. 3 pp. 340–363
   Google Scholar