References

• Andersen, J., Larsen, J. E., & Møller, I. H. (2009). The exclusion and marginalisation of immigrants in the Danish welfare society – Dilemmas and challenges. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29, 274–286. doi:10.1108/01443330910965804
   Google Scholar
• Andress, H. J., & Schulte, K. (1998). Poverty risks and the life cycle: The individualization thesis reconsidered. In H. J. Andress (Ed.), Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective (pp. 331–356). Aldershot: Ashgate
   Google Scholar
• Bak, C. K. (2004a). Demokratisering af fattigdommen?: En kritisk analyse af indkomstbaserede fattigdomsundersøgelser [Democratization of poverty? A critical analysis of income based poverty investigations]. Dansk Sociologi, 4 (15), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bak, C. K. (2004b). Individualisering og demokratisering af fattigdommen?: En kvantitativ og kvalitativ belysning af fattigdom i Danmark [Individualization and democratization of poverty? A quantitative and qualitative study of poverty in Denmark]. Copenhagen: Institute of Sociology, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2000). The brave new world of work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, K., Gustafsson, B., Pedersen, P. J., & Verner, M. (2007). At the lower end of the table: Determinants of poverty among immigrants to Denmark and Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 373–396. doi:10.1080/13691830701234517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. (2003). How has the notion of social exclusion developed in the European discourse? New York, NY: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 432–449. doi:10.1177/0958928711418856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clasen, J. (2005). Reforming European welfare states: Germany and United Kingdom compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deding, M., & Gerstoft, F. (2009). Børnefattigdom i Danmark 2002–2006 [Child poverty in Denmark 2002–2006]. København: SFI.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J. A., & Wright, J. D. (1993). The greatest of evils: Urban poverty and the American underclass. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ejrnæs, M., Hansen, H., & Larsen, J. E. (2010). Levekår og coping – Ressourcer, tilpasning og strategi blandt modtagere af de laveste sociale ydelser [Living conditions and coping – Resources, adaptation and strategy among recipients of the lowest social benefits]. København: CASA.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2002). Joint report on social Inclusion. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (1996). Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: The case of persistent differentials in educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 481–505. doi:10.2307/591365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goul-Andersen, J. (2007). Restricting access to social protection for immigrants in the Danish welfare state. Benefits, 15, 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 63–79. doi:10.1017/S1537592707070065
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. J. (1986). Danskernes levekår 1986 sammenholdt med 1976 [Living conditions among Danes 1986 compared to 1976]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. A. (2002). Poverty duration in Denmark. Essays on income distribution. Århus: Nationaløkonomisk Institut, Handelshøjskolen I Århus.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. (2008). Fra arbejdsmarkedspolitik til beskæftigelsespolitik – kosmetiske eller indholdsmæssige forskelle [From social policies to employment policy – cosmetic or substantive differences]? Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 10, 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. (2013). Incitamenter der går forkert – ‘fattigdomsydelser’, effekter og erosion af universalismen [Incentives that goes wrong – ‘poverty benefits’, effects and erosion of universalism]. Dansk Sociologi, 1, 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Kuivalainen, S., & Nelson, K. (2010). The Nordic welfare model in a European perspective. Arbetsrapport. Stockholm: Institutet för Fremtidsstudier 2010:10.
   Google Scholar
• Labor's Business Council (AE). (2012). Antallet af langvarigt fattige er steget med 80 procent i Danmark [The number of long-term poor people have increased with 80 percent in Denmark]. København: Arbejderbevægelsens Erhvervsråd.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. E. (2000). Klassebiografi og individuel biografi [Class biography and individual biography]. In J. E. Larsen, J. Lind, & I. H. Møller (Eds.), Kontinuitet og forandring: nye differentierings- og integrationsformer i samfundet? [Continuity and change: New forms of differentiation and integration in society?]. København: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. E. (2004a). Fattigdom og social eksklusion. Tendenser i Danmark over et kvart århundrede [Poverty and social exclusion. Tendencies in Denmark during a quarter of a century]. Copenhagen: SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. E. (2004b). Social eksklusion i Danmark 1976 til 2000 [Social exclusion in Denmark from 1976 to 2000]. Copenhagen: SFI – The Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. E. (2009). Marginalisering og levekår [Marginalization and living conditions]. In J. E. Larsen, & N. Mortensen (Eds.), Udenfor eller indenfor: sociale marginaliseringsprocessers mangfoldighed [Outside or inside: The variety of processes of social marginalization]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Layte, R., Maitre, B., Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2000). Persistent and consistent poverty in the 1994 and 1995 waves of the European community household panel study. EPAG Working Paper. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Layte, R., Maitre, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2002). Moving in and out of poverty: The impact of welfare regimes on dynamics in the EU. EPAG Working Paper 2002–30. Colchester: University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Layte, R., & Whelan, C. T. (2002). Cumulative disadvantage or individualization? A comparative analysis of poverty risk and incidence. European Societies, 4, 209–233. doi:10.1080/14616690220142790
   Google Scholar
• Leisering, L. (2002). The two uses of dynamic poverty research – Deterministic and contingent models of individual poverty careers. Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Leisering, L., & Leibfried, S. (1999). Time and poverty in western welfare states. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leisering, L., & Walker, R. (Eds.). (1998). The dynamics of modern society: Poverty, policy and welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., & Patsios, D. (2007). The multidimensional analysis of social exclusion. A research report for the social exclusion task force. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Schulte, B. (1992). Social assistance: A part of social security or the poor law in new disquise? In European Institute of Social Research (Ed.), Reforms in eastern and central Europe: Beveridge 50 years after. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997). Die gesellschaft der gesellschaft [The community of society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliband, D. (2006). Social exclusion: The next steps forward. London: ODPM.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R. (1959). The decline and fall of social class. Pacific Sociological Review, 2, 11–28. doi:10.2307/1388331
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. E. (1989). Is the emperor naked? Some questions on the adequacy of sociological theory in Urban and regional research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13, 709–720. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1989.tb00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., & Levitas, R. (2006). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: The millennium survey. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paugam, S. (1996). Poverty and social disqualification: A comparative analysis of cumulative social disadvantage in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 287–303. doi:10.1177/095892879600600402
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, P., & Smith, N. (2000). Low incomes in Denmark 1980–1995. In B. Gustafsson & P. Pedersen (Eds.), Poverty and low income in the Nordic countries (pp. 21–62). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ringen, S. (1988). Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 17, 351–365. doi:10.1017/S0047279400016858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakloglou, P., & Papadoupoulos, F. (2002). Aggregate level and determining factors of social exclusion in twelve European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 211–225. doi:10.1177/0952872002012003394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEF Office of Research. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview. Innocenti Report Card 11. Florence: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. (1985). Classes. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar