1,165
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Family concepts—a social pedagogic approach to understanding family development and working with families

Familienkonzepte—Ein sozialpädagogischer Forschungs- und Praxisansatz

&

References

  • Bengtson, V. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x
  • Binz, C., Schneider, N., & Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2010). Familie und Schulerfolg. Ein Literaturüberblick zum Einfluss der Familiensituation auf Schulleistungen [Family situation and its impact on schooling outcomes. A literature review]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 3, 280–294.
  • Bonifazi, C., Okólski, M., Schoorl, J., & Simon, P. (Eds.). (2009). International migration in Europe. Amsterdam: University Press.
  • Brückner, H., & Mayer, K. U. (2005). De-standardization of the life course: What it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? Advances in Life Course Research, 9, 27–53. doi:10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09002-1
  • Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (Ed.). (2006). Siebter Familienbericht: Familie zwischen Flexibilität und Verlässlichkeit: Perspektiven für eine lebenslaufbezogene Familienpolitik [Seventh family report. Families between flexibility and dependability – perspectives for a life cycle-related family policy]. Bundestags-Drucksache 16/1360.
  • Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unit of interacting personalities. The Family, 7, 3–9.
  • Cowan, P. (1991). Individual and family life transitions: A proposal for a new definition. In P. Cowan & M. Hetherington (Eds.), Family transitions (pp. 3–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cyprian, G. (2003). Familienbilder als Forschungsthema [Family images as a research subject]. In G. Cyprian & M. Heimbach-Stein (Eds.), Familienbilder. Interdisziplinäre Sondierungen [Family images. Interdisciplinary soundings] (pp. 9–19). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Daly, K. (2003). Family theory versus the theories families live by. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 771–784. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00771.x
  • Ecarius, J. (2007). Familienerziehung [Family education]. In J. Ecarius (Ed.), Handbuch Familie [Handbook of the family] (pp. 137–156). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Elzinga, C., & Liefbroer, A. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population, 23, 225–250. doi:10.1007/s10680-007-9133-7
  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41, 65–81. doi:10.1177/0038038507072284
  • Fthenakis, W. (2004). Familie im Wandel: Interventionen im Familienentwicklungsprozess—Anregungen für die Familienpolitik [Family in transitions: Interventions in the process of family development—suggestions for family policy]. In A. Schavan (Ed.), Perspektiven auf die Lebenswelten von Kindern und Jugendlichen [Perspectives on children's and young people's life-worlds] (pp. 137–185). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Constructivist's view of learning and teaching. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an international workshop (pp. 29–39). Kiel: IPN.
  • Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Learning and adoption in the theory of constructivism. In L. Smith (Ed.), Critical readings on Piaget (pp. 20–27). London: Routledge.
  • Gründler, S., Dobritz, J., Lück, D., Naderi, R., Ruckdeschel, K., Schiefer, K., & Schneider, N. (2013). Familienleitbilder. Vorstellungen. Meinungen. Erwartungen [Family models. Ideas. Expectations. Opinions]. Wiesbaden: Destatis/Bundesamt für Bevölkerungsforschung.
  • Hacker, J. (2006). The great risk shift: The new economic insecurity and the decline of the American dream. Oxford: University Press.
  • Hämäläinen, J. (2003). The concept of social pedagogy in the field of social work. Journal of Social Work, 3, 69–80. doi:10.1177/1468017303003001005
  • Hansen, K. (2005). Not-so-nuclear families: Class, gender and networks of care. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Herlth, A. (Ed.). (1989). Lebenslauf und Familienentwicklung [Life-course and family development]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Hertz, R. (2006). Talking about “doing” family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 796–799. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00293.x
  • Hess, R. D., & Handel, G. (1975). Familienwelten [Worlds of families]. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.
  • Jokinen, K., & Kuronen, M. (2011). Research on families and family policies in Europe—Major trends. In U. Uhlendorff, M. Rupp, & M. Euteneuer (Eds.), Wellbeing of families in future Europe. Challenges for research and policy (pp. 13–118). Raleigh, NC: Lulu.
  • Jurczyk, K., Schier, M., Szymenderski, P., Lange, A., & Voß, G. (Eds.). (2009). Entgrenzte Arbeit—Entgrenzte Familie: Grenzmanagement im Alltag als neue Herausforderung [Blurring the boundaries of work and family: Boundary management in everyday life as a challenge]. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
  • Kirchhöfer, D. (1997). Konsistenz und Inkonsistenz von Familienselbstbildern in Eltern-Kind-Beziehungen [Consistency and inconsistency of self-images of the family in parents-child relationships]. In J. Mansel, G. Rosenthal, & A. Tölke (Eds.), Generationen-Beziehungen, Austausch und Tradierung [Intergenerational relations. Intergenerational support and transmission of culture] (pp. 160–170). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Lüscher, K. (Ed.). (1993). Generationenbeziehungen in “postmodernen” Gesellschaften [Intergenerational relations in “postmodern” societies]. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.
  • Mackay, R. (2005). The impact of family structure and family change on child outcomes. A personal reading of the research literature. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 24, 111–133.
  • Mansel, J., Rosenthal, G., & Tölke, A. (Eds.). (1997). Generationen-Beziehungen, Austausch und Tradierung [Intergenerational relations, exchange and transmission of culture]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Marotzki, W. (1990). Entwurf einer strukturalen Bildungstheorie. Biographietheoretische Auslegung von Bildungsprozessen in hochkomplexen Gesellschaften [Draft of a structural theory of Bildung. A biographical understanding of processes of bildung in complex societies]. Weinheim: Deutscher Studienverlag.
  • Mollenhauer, K. (1959). Die Ursprünge der Sozialpädagogik in der industriellen Gesellschaft: eine Untersuchung zur Struktur sozialpädagogischen Denkens und Handelns [The origins of social pedagogy in the industrial society. A study on the structure of social pedagogic ways of thinking and acting]. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • Mollenhauer, K., Brumlik, M., & Wudtke, H. (1975). Die Familienerziehung [Family education]. München: Juventa.
  • Moss, P., & Cameron, C. (2011). Social pedagogy: Current understandings and opportunities. In P. Moss & C. Cameron (Eds.), Social pedagogy and working with children and young people. Where care and education meet (pp. 7–32). London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Reinders, H. (1999). Familienformen im sozialen Wandel [Change of family forms] (6th ed.). Wiesbaden: VS für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Rönkä, A., & Korvela, P. (2009). Everyday family life: Dimensions, approaches and current challenges. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 87–102. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00011.x
  • Schütz, A., & Luckmann, Th. (1973). Structures of the life-world (Vols. 1 and 2). Evenston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Smith, M. K. (2009). Social pedagogy. In The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://infed.org/mobi/social-pedagogy-the-development-of-theory-and-practice/
  • Thiersch, H. (2012). Lebensweltorientierte Soziale Arbeit: Aufgaben der Praxis im sozialen Wandel [Life-world orientated social work: Practical tasks against the background of social change] (8th ed.). Weinheim: Juventa.
  • Uhlendorff, U. (2009). Das sozialpädagogische Problem [The social pedagogic problem]. In N. Meder, C. Allemann-Ghionda, U. Uhlendorff, & G. Mertens (Eds.), Erziehungswissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Handbuch der Erziehungswissenschaft 6 [Educational sciences and society. Handbook of the educational sciences (Vol. 6)] (pp. 11–29). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
  • Uhlendorff, U., Cinkl, S., & Marthaler, T. (2008). Sozialpädagogische Familiendiagnosen [Social pedagogic family assessment] (2nd ed.). Weinheim: Juventa.
  • Wahl, K. (1999). Familienbilder und Familienrealitäten [Family images and family facts/realities]. In L. Böhnisch & K. Lenz (Eds.), Familie. Eine interdisziplinäre Einführung [Families – An interdisciplinary introduction] (2nd ed.). Weinheim: Juventa.
  • Walther, A., & Stauber, B. (2013). Übergänge im Lebenslauf [Transitions in life-course]. In W. Schröer, B. Stauber, A. Walther, L. Böhnisch & K. Lenz (Eds.), Handbuch Übergänge [Handbook of transitions in life-course] (pp. 23–43). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
  • Widmer, E., & Ritschard, G. (2009). The de-standardization of the life course: Are men and women equal? Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2009.04.001
  • Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
  • Winkler, M. (1988). Eine Theorie der Sozialpädagogik [A theory of social pedagogy]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.