References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). The two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89. doi:10.2307/2393986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., Know, S.-W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19, 359–376. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, F., & Amaro, I. (2011). As práticas do ‘Serviço Social activo’ no âmbito das novas tendências da política social: uma perspectiva portuguesa [Practices of the ‘Social Service active’ under the new trends in social policy: A Portuguese perspective]. Serviço Social & Sociedade, 108, 656–679.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, T. (2010). Professional fields and truth regimes: In search of alternative approaches. Comparative Sociology, 9, 843–886. doi:10.1163/156913310X522615
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, L. (1996). Bureaucratic organisation of professional labour. Journal of Sociology, 32, 21–38. doi:10.1177/144078339603200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brint, S. (2006). Saving the ‘soul of professions’: Freidson's institutional ethics and the defense of professional autonomy. Knowledge, Work & Society, 4, 101–129.
   Google Scholar
• Caria, T. H. (2005). Saber profissional. Coimbra: Almedina.
   Google Scholar
• Caria, T. H. (2010). A mobilização de conhecimento em situação de trabalho profissional [The mobilization of knowledge in professional work context]. In V. Fartes & M. R. Gomes de Sá (Eds.), Currículo, formação e saberes profissionais: A revalorização epistemológica da experiência [Curriculum, training and professional knowledge] (pp. 126–148). Salvador: Editora EDUFBA.
   Google Scholar
• Caria, T. H. (2013). O trabalho profissional burocrático: Modelo de análise da profissionalização do trabalho em serviço social no setor não lucrativo em Portugal [The bureaucratic professional work: Analysis model of professionalization work in social work in the nonprofit sector in Portugal]. Dados: Revista de Ciências Sociais, 56, 829–865.
   Google Scholar
• Champy, F. (2011). Nouvelle thèorie sociologique des professions [New sociological theory of professions]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Chopart, J.-N. (2000). Les mutation du travail social: Dynamique d'un champ profissionnel [The mutation of social work: Dynamics of a profissionnel field]. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Demailly, L. (2004). Une spécificité de l'approche sociologique française des groups professionnels: Une sociologie clivée [Specificity of the french sociological approach to professional groups: A cleaved sociology]. Savoir, Travail et Société, II, 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism: Occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18, 395–415. doi:10.1177/0268580903018002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59, 406–422. doi:10.1177/0011392111402585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henriquez, B. A. (1999). A teoria funcionalista das profissões e o serviço social [The functionalist theory of professions and social services]. In M. A. Negreiros, A. Martins, B. A. Henriquez, & J. McDonough (Eds.), Serviço social, profissão e identidade: Que trajectória? [Social work, profession and identity: What trajectory?] (pp. 99–123). Lisbon and São Paulo: Veras Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21, 487–513. doi:10.1177/0170840600213001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K. (1995). The sociology of professions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi, B. (2003). De l'agir organisationnel: Um point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l'apprentissage [From the organizational action: A perspective on work, welfare, and learning]. Toulouse: Octarès Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Ministério da Solidariedade e da Segurança Social (MSSS). (2011). Carta social: Rede de serviços e equipamentos 2011 [Social Charter: Network of services and equipments, in 2011]. Lisbon: GEP-MSSS.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., & Grimen, H. (2010). Understanding professional discretion. In L. Svensson & J. Evetts (Eds.), Sociology of professions: Continental and Anglo-Saxon traditions (pp. 167–187). Goteborg: Bokforlaget Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Muzio, D., Hodgson, D., Faulconbridge, J., Beaverstock, J., & Hall, S. (2011). Towards corporate professionalization: The case of project management, management consultancy and executive search. Current Sociology, 59, 443–464. doi:10.1177/0011392111402587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From pure to hybrid professionalism: Present day professionalism in ambíguos public domains. Administration & Society, 39, 761–785. doi:10.1177/0095399707304434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32, 1349–1341. doi:10.1177/0170840611416748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlin, S., Svetlik, I., & Evetts, J. (2010). Revisiting the role of formal and practical knowledge from a sociology of the professions perspective: The case of Slovenia. Current Sociology, 58, 94–118. doi:10.1177/0011392109348547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestana, M. H., & Gageiro, J. N. (2008). Análise de dados para as ciências sociais: A complementariedade com o SPSS [Data analysis for the social sciences: The complementarity with SPSS]. Lisbon: Edições Sílabo.
   Google Scholar
• Quintão, C. (2011). O terceiro sector e a sua renovação em Portugal [The third sector and its renovation in Portugal]. IS Working Papers, 2(2). Retrieved from http://isociologia.pt/App_Files/Documents/is-wp-ns-002_110411025242.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. (1996). Expert power and control in late modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis. Organization Studies, 17, 573–597. doi:10.1177/017084069601700402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (1975). Professionalization, bureaucratization and rationalization: The views of Max Weber. Social Forces, 53, 627–634. doi:10.1093/sf/53.4.627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, M. (2010). Analyzing the professions: The case for the neo-Weberian approach. Comparative Sociology, 9, 887–915. doi:10.1163/156913310X522624
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (2006). New professionalism, trust and competence: Some conceptual remarques and empirical data. Current Sociology, 54, 579–593. doi:10.1177/0011392106065089
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (2010). Professions, organizations, collegiability and accountability. In L. Svensson & J. Evetts (Eds.), Sociology of professions: Continental and Anglo-Saxon traditions (pp. 145–166). Goteborg: Bokforlaget Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M. (1989). Collegiality, bureaucratization and professionalization: A Weberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 945–972. doi:10.1086/229109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, M. (1993). Alternative organizational formations: A neo-Weberian typology of polycratic administrative systems. The Sociological Review, 41, 54–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb02954.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., & Welbourne, P. (2007). The professionalisation of social work: A cross-national exploration. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 281–290. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar