References

• Achinstein, P. (2010). Evidence, explanation, and realism: Essays in philosophy of science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Achinstein, P. (2013). Evidence and method: Scientific strategies of Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A. (2012). Necessary and sufficient conditions. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/necessary-sufficient/
   Google Scholar
• Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2012). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (2011). Evidence, external validity, and explanatory relevance. In G. J. Morgan (Ed.), Philosophy of science matters: The philosophy of Peter Achinstein (pp. 15–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. (2013). Evidence, argument and prediction. In V. Karakostas & D. Dieks (Eds.), EPSA11 perspectives and foundational problems in philosophy of science: Series: The European philosophy of science association proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., & Munro, E. (2010). The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 260–266. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01382.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawid, P., Twining, W., & Vasilaki, D. (Eds.). (2012). Evidence, inference and enquiry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiFate, V. (2007). The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved March 4, 2015, http://www.iep.utm.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Eden, J., Levit, L., Berg, A., & Morton, S. (2011). Committee on standards for systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research: Institute of medicine. Board on health care services. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foxcroft, D. R., Ireland, D., Lister-Sharp, D. J., Lowe, G., & Breen, R. (2003). Longer-term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: A systematic review. Addiction, 98, 397–411. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00355.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. (2001). The science of conjecture: Evidence and probability before Pascal. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., & Steiner, J. F. (2012). Comparative effectiveness research to accelerate translation: Recommendations for an emerging field of science. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 72–93). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R., Mancher, M., Wolman, D. M., Greenfield, S., & Steinberg, E. (2011). Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines; Institute of medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haack, S. (2007). Defending science – within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Howick, J. H. (2011). The philosophy of evidence-based medicine (Kindle Fire Version ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell BMJ Books.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research. (2007). Partnerships to integrate evidence-based mental health practices into social work education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. P., & Moore, T. A. (2012). The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment. Social Theory & Health, 10, 1–19. doi:10.1057/sth.2011.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawry, S., Samii, C., Hall, R., Leopold, A., Hornby, D., & Mtero, F. (2014). The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10, 1. doi:10.4073/csr.2014.10
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 12, 245–265.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2010a). Evidence-based practice: Finding evidence. Oxford Bibliographies Online.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2010b). Evidence-based practice: Issues, controversies, & debates. Oxford Bibliographies Online.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2010c). Evidence-based practice: Overview. Oxford Bibliographies Online.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2014). Comparative effectiveness research: Designs and methods. In S. Kalliola (Ed.), Evaluation as a tool for research, learning and making things better (pp. 13–30). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., & Soydan, H. (2012). Translation and implementation of evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlins, M. (2008). Harveian Oration: On the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. The Lancet, 372, 2152–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield, J., Spring, B., Brownson, R. C., Mullen, E., Newhouse, R., & Walker, B. (2009). Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 368–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schum, D. (2012). Classifying forms and combinations of evidence: Necessary in a science of evidence. In P. Dawid, W. Twining, & D. Vasilaki (Eds.), Evidence, inference and enquiry (pp. 11–36). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segrott, J., Holliday, J., Rothwell, H., Foxcroft, D., Murphy, S., Scourfield, J., … Moore, L. (2014). Cultural adaptation and intervention integrity: A response to Skarstrand, Sundell and Andreasson. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 354–355. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarstrand, E., Sundell, K., & Andreasson, S. (2013). Evaluation of a Swedish version of the strengthening families programme. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 578–584. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarstrand, E., Sundell, K., & Andreasson, S. (2014). Response to the commentary of Segrot et al on the Swedish SFP trial. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 355–356. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2001). Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: Adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 69, 627–642. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.69.4.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., & Haynes, R. B. (2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, J. B. (1898). A preliminary treatise on evidence at common law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., … Chalkidou, K. (2009). A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): A tool to help trial designers. CMAJ, 180, E47–E57.
   Google Scholar
• Twining, W. (2003). Evidence as a multi-disciplinary subject. Law, Probability and Risk: A Journal of Reasoning Under Uncertainty, 2, 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Twining, W. (2012). Moving beyond law: Interdisciplinarity and the study of evidence. In P. Dawid, W. Twining, & D. Vasilaki (Eds.), Evidence, inference and enquiry (pp. 73–118). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upshur, R. E. G., & Tracy, C. S. (2004). Legitimacy, authority and hierarchy: Critical challenges for evidence-based medicine. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 197–204. doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhh018
   Google Scholar
• Velengtas, P., Mohr, P., & Messner, D. A. (Eds.). (2012). Making informed decisions: Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of study designs and analytic methods for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: National Pharmaceutical Council.
   Google Scholar
• Wigmore, J. H. (1937). The science of judicial proof: As given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. (2010). Evidence: Philosophy of science meets medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 356–362. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01400.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar