References

• Baldwin, M. (2010). Does self-assessment in a group help students to learn? Social Work Education, 19, 451–462. doi:10.1080/026154700435977
   Google Scholar
• Banks S. (1995). Ethics and values in social work. British association of social workers. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2008). Critical commentary: Social work ethics. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1238–1249. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2006). Caring and social justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy; a report on theoretical aspects of the project of study of the role of the paradoxes of abstraction in communication. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 53–68. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braye, S., & Preston-Shoot, M. (1995). Empowering practice in social care. Buckingham: Open university Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Bhui, K., Fulop, N., & Tyrer, P. (2002). The greencard system for general practitioner registrars in Scotland. BMJ, 325, 1263–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, S., & Beresford, P. (1990). Learning the lessons of user involvement: Implications for training. Social Work and Social Science Review, 2, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (1995). Anti-oppressive practice: social care and the law. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, J., & Doyle, W. (2007). The role of higher education in state budgets. State postsecondary education research: New methods to inform policy and practice. Sterling: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2010). Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, R., & Telfer, E. (1980). Caring and curing. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (2002). Accelerating change. A report by strategic forum for construction. London: Rethinking Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2005). Working with violence, the emotions and the psycho-social dynamics of child protection: Reflections on the Victoria Climbié case. Social Work Education, 24, 781–795. doi:10.1080/02615470500238702
   Google Scholar
• Folgheraiter, F. (2004). Relational social work: Toward networking and societal practices. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Folgheraiter, F. (2007). Relational social work: Principles and practices. Social Policy and Society, 6, 265–274. doi:10.1017/S1474746406003526
   Google Scholar
• Folgheraiter, F. (2012). The mystery of social work. Trento: Erickson.
   Google Scholar
• Folgheraiter, F., & Raineri, M. L. (2012). A critical analysis of the social work definition according to the relational paradigm. International Social Work, 4, 473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, M., & Mullen, E. J. (Eds.). (1995). Practitioner-research partnerships: Building knowledge from, in, and for practice. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1990). Social work in an unjust society. London: Hemel Hempstead.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, S. A., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Cattani-Thompson, K. (1996). Current findings regarding the effectiveness of counseling: Implication for practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 601–608.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J., & Hutchison, P. (1993). The process of empowerment: Implications for theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 12(1), 5–22. doi:10.7870/cjcmh-1993-0001
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). What's in a name: ‘Client’, ‘patient’, ‘customer’, ‘consumer’, ‘expert by experience’, ‘service user’—What's next? British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1101–1117. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2000). Some thoughts on the relationship between theory and practice in and for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 449–463. doi:10.1093/bjsw/30.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2007). Whose lives and whose learning? Whose narratives and whose writing? Taking the next research and literature steps with experts by experience. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 3, 343–359. doi:10.1332/174426407781738056
   Google Scholar
• Raineri, M. L. (2003). Il tirocinio di servizio sociale [Social work training placement]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Webber, M. (2013). Models and effectiveness of service user and carer involvement in social work education: A literature review. British Journal of social work, 43, 925–944. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R., & Kinget, M. (1965). Psychotérapie et relations humaines [Psycotherapy and human relationships]. Nauwelaerts: Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41, 296–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York, NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, J., & Taylor, A. (2014). Using a book group to facilitate student learning about social work. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 33, 533–538. doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.832190
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2004). Respect: The formation of character in an age of inequality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care: Feminist considerations of justice, morality and politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists. (2012). Service user experience in adult mental health. London: Stanley L. Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (1991). Crisis intervention revisited. Birmingham: Pepar.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (2002). Loss and grief: A guide for human services practitioners. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (2006). Lavorare con le persone [Working with people]. Trento: Erickson.
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2005). Social work skills. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikler, L. (1979). Consumer involvement in the training of social work students. Social Casework, 60, 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes, R. (1985). Social work: What kind of profession? In D. Watson (Ed.), A code of ethics for social work: The second step (pp. 40–58). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Winterton, J., Delamare Le Deist, F., & Stringfellow, E. (2005). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: Clarification of the concept and prototype, CEDEFOP Reference series 64. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar