2,715
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Service user involvement in Swedish mental health and social care: an analysis of ideological dilemmas and subject positions in a collaboration context

Brukarmedverkan inom svensk psykiatri och socialtjänst: en analys av ideologiska dilemman och subjektspositioner i en samverkanskontext

References

  • Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.
  • Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge university press.
  • Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1989). Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.
  • Bracken, R. (2005). Socialpsykiatrin i tider av förvandling [Social psychiatry in times of change]. Sollentuna: FoU Södertörns Skriftserie.
  • Braye, S. (2002). Participation and involvement in social care: An overview. In H. Kemshall & R. Littlechild (Eds.), User involvement and participation in social care (pp. 9–28). London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Braye, S., Orr, D., & Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). The governance of adult safeguarding: Findings from research into Safeguarding Adults Boards. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  • Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). London: Sage.
  • Eriksson, E. (2013). To tell the right story: Functions of the personal user narrative in service user involvement. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 21, 1–32.
  • Hodge, S. (2005). Participation, discourse and power: A case study in service user involvement. Critical Social Policy, 25, 164–179. doi: 10.1177/0261018305051324
  • Horton-Salway, M. (2001). The construction of M.E.: The disursive action model. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 147–188). London: Sage.
  • Hultqvist, S. (2008). Om brukardelaktighet i välfärdssystemen - en kunskapsöversikt [On user participation in the welfare systems—a systematic review]. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
  • Karlsson, K. (2007). Funktionshinder, samtal och självbestämmande [Impairments, conversation, and self-determination]. Linköping: LiU-Tryck.
  • Karlsson, M., & Börjeson, M. (2011). Brukarmakt i teori och praktik [User power in theory and practice]. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Mik-Meyer, N., & Järvinen, M. (2005). Indledning [Introduction]. In M. Järvinen & N. Mik-Meyer (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv [Qualitative methods in an interactionistic perspective] (pp. 9–24). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  • Mossberg, L. (2014). Stategic collaboration as means and end: Views from members of Swedish mental health strategic collaboration councils. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28, 58–63. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.829422
  • Peck, E., Gulliver, P., & Towel, D. (2002). Information, consultation or control: User involvement in mental health services in England at the turn of the century. Journal of Mental Health, 11, 523–531. doi: 10.1080/09638230020023877
  • Petersen, K., Hounsgaard, L., & Vinther Nielsen, C. (2008). User participation and involvement in mental health rehabilitation: A literature review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 15, 306–314. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2008.15.7.30453
  • Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Crawford, M. J., & Fulop, N. (2004). Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1973–1984. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00401-5
  • Stickley, T. (2006). Should service user involvement be consigned to history? A critical realist perspective. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 1 570–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00982.x
  • Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytical research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 5–48). London: Sage.
  • Ward, D. (2002). Totem not token: Groupwork as a vehicle for user participation. In H. Kemshall & R. Littlechild (Eds.), User involvement and participation in social care. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Winther Jörgensen, M., & Philips, L. (2000). Diskursanalys som teori och metod [Discourse analysis as theory and method]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Woofitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversation analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 49–92). London: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.