References

• Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abram, F. Y., Mahaney, H. A., Linhorst, D. M., Toben, J., & Flowers, M. (2005). Interorganizational collaboratives for children of prisoners: One that succeeds, another that struggled. Journal of Community Practice, 13(1), 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390. doi:10.1177/0018726711430555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J., & Robinson, M. (2010). Developing multi-professional teamwork for integrated children's services. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M., Jones, M., & Lamont, E. (2007). Multi-agency working and its implications for practice: A review of the literature. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, D., Dutch, N., & Wang, K. (2008). Collaborative efforts to improve system response to families who are experiencing child maltreatment and domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(7), 876–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. Reis, and C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 3–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catania, L. S., Hetrick, S. E., Newman, L. K., & Purcell, R. (2011). Prevention and early intervention for mental health problems in 0–25 year olds: Are there evidence-based models of care? Advances in Mental Health, 10(1), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, K. (2001). Tverfaglig samarbejde—gevinst eller tap? [Multidisciplianry collaboration—gain or loss?] In J. Bundgaard Nielsen & M. Knudsen (Eds.), Antologi om tværfagligt samarbejde [Anthology on multidisciplinary collaboration] (pp. 17–25). Aabenraa: Udviklings- og Formidlingscentret Børn og Familier & Udviklings- og formidlingscentret for Fyn og Sønderjylland.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2008). At fremstille kvalitative data [Presenting qualitative data] (2nd ed.). Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J. (2001). Safeguarding young people through confidential advocacy services. Child & Family Social Work, 6(2), 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, Y., Feeney, J. A., & Rixon, K. (2005). Interagency collaboration between child protection and mental health services: Practices, attitudes and barriers. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(10), 1085–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabble, L., & Poole, N. (2011). Collaboration between addiction treatment and child welfare fields: Opportunities in a Canadian context. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 11(2), 124–149.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, E., & Levin, M. (1991). Cogenerative learning. Bringing participation into action research. Participatory Action Research, 7(2), 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J. (2002). Action research. Unfilled promises and unmet challenges. Concepts and Transformation, 7(2), 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research. Social research for social change. (2nd ed.). California, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwoord, D. J., Whyte, W. F., & Harkavy, I. (1993). Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Human Relations, 46(2), 175–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, S. M., Bauer-Leffler, S., & Turley, E. (2011). Evaluation of cross-disciplinary training on the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child victimization: Overcoming barriers to collaboration. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 34(3), 352–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horwath, J., & Morrison, T. (2011). Effective inter-agency collaboration to safeguard children: Rising to the challenge through collective development. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 368–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatekin, C., Hong, S., Piescher, K., Uecker, J. & McDonald, J. (2014). An evaluation of the effects of an integrated services program for multi-service use families on child welfare and educational outcomes of children. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutash, K., Acri, M., Pollock, M., Armusewicz, K., Olin, S. S., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2014). Quality indicators for multidisciplinary team functioning in community-based children's mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(1), 55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2008). Interview: En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview [Interviews]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• May-Chahal, C., & Broadhurst, K. (2006). Integrating objects of intervention and organizational relevance: the case of safeguarding children missing from education systems. Child Abuse Review, 15(6), 440–455.
   Google Scholar
• Mckeown, K. (2012). Inter-agency cooperation between services for children and families in Ireland: Does it improve outcomes? Journal of Children's Services, 7(3), 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd printing ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Midskard, J. (2008). Multi-disciplinary work [‘tværfagligt samarbejde’] in Denmark an overview of the literature. Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid, 28(3–4), 247–258.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, A., Mooney, A., & Statham, J. (2010). Integrated working: A review of the evidence. London: Thomas Coram research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311–319. doi:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90026-4
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillippo, K., & Stone, S. (2006). School-based collaborative teams: An exploratory study of tasks and activities. Children and Schools, 28(4), 229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlak, A. J., Schultz, D., Wells, S. J., Lyons, P., Doueck, H. J., & Grag, F. (2006, June). Child protection and justice systems processing of serious child abuse and neglect cases. Child Abuse Negl, 30(6), 657–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2009). Improving development outcomes for children through effective practice in integrating early years services. C4EO—centre for excellence and outcomes in children and young people's services. Research Review 3, 1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, D. M., & Alarcão, M. (2011). Integrated family assessment and intervention model: A collaborative approach to support multi-challenged families. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 33(4), 400–416.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, M., Liebenberg, L., Dudding, P., Armstrong, M., & Van De Vijver Fons, J. R. (2013). Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37(2), 150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. California, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. (1995). Encounters with participatory action research. Qualitative Sociology, 18(3), 289–299.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S., Sumsion, J., & Press, F. (2012). Early childhood professionals and inter-professional work in integrated early childhood services in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(1), 81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar