1,115
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Family group conferences: from Maori culture to decision-making model in work with late modern families in NorwayFootnote

Familieråd: Fra Maorikultur til beslutningsmodell i senmoderne familier i Norge

, , &

References

  • Andresen, R. (2000). Fellesskap og sammenhenger: yrkeshjelpere i grupper, nettverk og organisasjoner [Fellowship and relationships: professional helpers in groups, networks and organisations]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Andersen, A. J. (2003). Menn skaper rom for foreldreskap og familie. Farskapets betingelser i enheteronormativ kultur [Men make room for parenthood and family. The terms of fatherhood in a heteronormative culture] (Doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, NTNU, Trondheim.
  • Andersson, B., & Bjerkman, A. (1999). Mellan myndighet och familj: en kvalitativ undersökning av familjerådslag i Sverige [Between the authority and the family: a qualitative study of family group conferencing in Sweden]. Stockholm: Forsknings-och utveklingsenheten, Socialtjänstförvaltningen.
  • Backe-Hansen, E. (2006). Hvordan virker familieråd? Et internasjonalt perspektiv [How do family councils work? An international perspective]. In S. Falck (Ed.), Hva er det med familieråd? Samlerapport fra prosjektet: Nasjonal satsing for utprøving og evaluering av familieråd i Norge [What is it about FGC? Project summary report: National initiative for the trial and evaluation of family group conferences in Norway] (pp. 249–284). Oslo, Norway: NOVA.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). On the family as a realized category. Theory, Culture & Society, 13, 19–26. doi: 10.1177/026327696013003002
  • Cheal, D. (2002). Sociology of family life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dooland, M. (2010). The family group conference: Changing the face of child welfare. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/Cities/Publication/BookCoE08-MikeDoolan.pdf
  • Durie, M. (1994). Whaiora: Mâori health development. Auckland, NZ: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellingsæter, A. L. (2012). Innledning: Velferdsstatens familier [Introduction: Families of the welfare state] (13–31). In A. L. Ellingsæter & K. Widerberg (Eds.), Velferdsstatens familier [Families of the welfare state] (pp. 13–31). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Engebretsen, E. (2007). Hva sa klienten? Retorikken i barnevernets journaler [What did the client say? The rhetoric in the records of child protective services]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
  • Falck, S. (Ed.). (2006). Hva er det med familieråd? Samlerapport fra prosjektet: “Nasjonal satsing for utprøving og evaluering av familieråd i Norge” [What is it about FGC? Project summary report: National initiative for the trial and evaluation of family group conferences in Norway]. Oslo: NOVA.
  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41, 65–81. London, England: Sage. doi: 10.1177/0038038507072284
  • Frost, N., Abram, F., & Burgess, H. (2014a). Family group conferences, outcomes and future research. Child and Family Social Work, 19, 501–507. doi:10.1111/cfs.12049
  • Frost, N., Abram, F., & Burgess, H. (2014b). Family group conferences: Context, process and ways forward. Child and Family Social Work, 19, 480–490. doi:10.1111/cfs.12047
  • Früktel, F., & Burns, G. (2011). Family group conference—A bridge between lifeworld and system. British Journal of Social Work, 2012, 1–15. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs192
  • Giddens, A. (1994). Intimitetens forandring: Seksualitet, kærlighed og erotik i det modern samfund [The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies]. Copenhagen: Reitzel.
  • Gilding, M. (2010). Reflexivity over and above convention: the new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family. British Journal of Sociology, 61, 757–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01340.x
  • Havnen, K., & Christiansen, Ø. (2014). Kunnskapsstatus om familieråd. Erfaringer og effekter [The state of knowledge, family group conference. Experiences and effects]. Regionalt kunnskapssenter for barn og unge (RKBU Vest). Uni Research Helse.
  • Heino, T., Reinikainen, S., & Bergman, M. (2003). Familjerådslag i Norden. Erfarenheter, forskningsresultat, reflektioner. [Family group conferencing in the Nordic region. Experiences, research results, reflections]. SSKH Meddelanden 66. Helsingfors: Svenska social-och kommunalhögskolan, Helsingfors Universitet.
  • Horverak, S. (2006). Hvordan opplever ungdom å delta i familieråd: Et bidrag til arbeidet med barnevernets etikk og diskusjonen om barnevernets rolle i samfunnet [How youth perceive participation in FGCs: A contribution to the work on Child Protection Services’ ethics and the debate surrounding the role of CPS in society] (Doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Institute for Social Work and Health Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim.
  • Horverak, S. (Ed.). (2009). Familieråd og nettverksråd [Family group conferencing and network conferencing]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Hudson, J. (1996). Family group conferences: Perspectives on policy and practice. Annandale: Federation Press.
  • Karpatshof, B., & Karpatshof, l. (2004). Familierådslagning-den gode vilje og den genstridige virkelighed [Building family, family group conferencing—the good will and the obstinate reality]. Virum: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
  • Lupton, C., & Nixon, P. (1999). Empowering practice? A critical appraisal of the family group conference approach. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.
  • Lupton, C., & Stevens, M. (1997). Family outcomes: Following through on family group conferences. Social Service Research and Information Unit, University of Portsmouth.
  • Marsh, P. & Crow, G. (1998). Family group conferences in child welfare. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Rasmussen, M. B., & Hansen, T. H. (2002). En beslutningsmodel med meget mere: en undersøgelse af “Det danske forsøg med Familierådslagning”. [A decision model and much more: a study of “The Danish trials with Family Group Conferencing”]. Aabenraa: UDC Børn og Familier.
  • Ryburn, M., & Atherton, C. (1996). Family group conferences: Partnership in practice. Adoption & Fostering, 20, 16–23. doi: 10.1177/030857599602000105
  • Schjelderup, L., & Omre, C. (2009). Kjernen i familieråd—familiens eget møte [The core of the family group conferences—the family meeting]. In S. Horverak (Ed.), Familieråd og nettverksråd [Family and network conferencing] (pp. 119–152). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Shlonsky, A., Schumaker, K., Cook, K. C., Crampton, D., Saini, M., Backe-Hansen, E., & Kowalski, K. (2009). Family group decision making for children at risk of abuse and neglect. Retrieved from The Campbell Collaboration Social Welfare Group: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007984/abstract
  • Skerfing, A. (1999). Tvetydigt resultat av familjerådslag på Nya Zeeland. [Ambiguous outcomes of family group conference in New Zealand]. Socionomen, 37, 11–15.
  • Skivenes, M., & Eriksen, E. O. (2000). Nye deltakelsesformer og demokratisk medvirkning [New forms of participation and democratic contribution]. Bergen: LOS Centre Report R0010.
  • Skivenes, M., & Strandbu, A. (2005). Familieråd som deliberativ beslutningsmodell og behovet for et barneperspektiv [The FGC as a deliberative decision model and the need for a child's perspective]. In E. Willumsen (Ed.), Brukernes medvirkning [Client participation] (pp. 140–157). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • SSB [Statistics Norway]. (2011). Barn og unges familier [Children and young people's families]. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/barn_og_unge/2011/familie/
  • Strandbu, A. (2007). Barns deltakelse og barneperspektivet i familierådsmodellen [The participation and perspective of the child in the FGC-model] (Doctoral dissertation). Institute for Pedagogy and Teacher Education, UiT, Tromsø.
  • Straub, U. (2012). Family group conference in Europe: From margin to mainstream. ERIS 1/2012. Retrieved from: http://www.familygroupconference2011.eu/en/organization
  • Sundell, K., & Hæggman, U. (1999). Familjerådslag i Sverige: en utvärdering av Svenska kommunförbundets försöksverksamhet [FGC in Sweden: an evaluation by the Swedish Association of local authorities]. Stockholm: Forsknings-och utveklingsenheten, Socialtjänstförvaltningen.
  • Syltevik, L. J. (2000). Differensierte familieliv. Familiepraksis i Norge på slutten av 90-tallet [Heterogeneous family life. Family practices in Norway at the end of the 90s]. Bergen, Norway: Centre for Societal Research Report 2/2000, UiB.
  • Villadsen, K. (2004). Socialt arbejde og subjektivering—Fra velfærdsplanlægning til postmoderne socialpolitik [Social work and subjectification—From welfare planning to postmodern social policy], pp. 613–641. Virum: Dansk psykologisk Forlag.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.