Towards an interactional approach to reflective practice in social work

References

• Askeland, G. A., & Fook, J. (2009). Critical reflection in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 287–292. doi: 10.1080/13691450903100851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 293–304. doi: 10.1080/13691450902945215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, C., Potter, J., Danby, S., Emmison, M., & Hepburn, A. (2010). Advice implicative interrogatives: Building ‘client centred’ support in a children's helpline. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 265–287. doi: 10.1177/0190272510379838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., Eskelinen, L., & Olesen, S. P. (2013). Identity work and client resistance underneath the canopy of active employment policy. Qualitative Social Work, 12, 8–23. doi: 10.1177/1473325011413629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley, H., Roddam, G., & Wistow, J. (2009). Working with service users and carers. In L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates (3rd ed., pp. 193–208). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• The College of Social Work. (2012). Developing your social work practice using the PCF: Integrated critical analysis and reflective practice. Retrieved from www.tcsw.org.uk/uploadedfiles/TheCollege/Media_centre/PCF21IntegratedCriticalReflectivePractice(1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E., Macrae, R., Smith, M., Knowles, N., O'Halloran, S., Sharp, D., & Wallace, E. (2014). Critical reflection workshops and knowledge exchange: Findings from a Scottish project. Child & Family Social Work [early view]. doi:10.1111/cfs.12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, M., Halton, C., & Murphy, M. (2001). Reflective learning in social work education: Scaffolding the process. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 20, 631–641. doi: 10.1080/02615470120089825
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2009). Anti-oppressive practice: The challenges of the twenty-first century. In L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates (3rd ed., pp. 49–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., Toerien, M., Irvine, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2014). Personal adviser interviews with benefits claimants in UK jobcentres. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 306–316. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2014.925669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (2007). Managing subjectivity in talk. In A. Hepburn, & S. Wiggins (Eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction (pp. 31–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, P. (2013). Therapy talk: Conversation analysis in practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, S., & Taylor, A. (2013). Decision making in social work with children and families: The use of experiential and analytical cognitive processes. British Journal of Social Work [advanced access]. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Juhila, K., Matarese, M., & van Nijnatten, C. (Eds.). (2014). Analysing social work communication: Discourse in practice. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Morriss, L. (2014, August). Progress, risk and choice in mental health review meetings. Paper presented to the 11th annual meeting of the Discourse and Narrative Approaches to Social Work and Counselling Research Group, Durham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2005). Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., Caswell, D., & Raitakari, S. (2014). Resistance. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, M. Matarese, & C. van Nijnatten (Eds.), Analysing social work communication: Discourse in practice (pp. 117–135). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., & Pösö, T. (1999a). Local cultures in social work: Ethnographic understanding and discourse analysis in probation work. In S. Karvinen, T. Pösö, & M. Satka (Eds.), Reconstructing social work research (pp. 165–207). Jyväskylä: SoPhi and Sosiaalityön tutkimuksen seura.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., & Pösö, T. (1999b). Negotiating constructions: Rebridging social work research and practice in the context of probation work. In A. Jokinen, K. Juhila, & T. Pösö (Eds.), Constructing social work practices (pp. 274–303). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, H. (2014). Seeking ethical symmetry: An analysis of criminal justice social work practice with a female ‘offender’. Ethics and Social Welfare, 8, 408–416. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2014.954767
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology & discourse. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., Farrall, S., Lightowler, C., & Maruna, S. (2012). Reexamining evidence-based practice in community corrections: Beyond “a confined view” of what works. Justice Research and Policy, 14, 35–60. doi: 10.3818/JRP.14.1.2012.35
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., & Whyte, B. (2007). Reducing re-offending: Community justice and social work in Scotland. Cullompton: Willan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, L., Lyall, C., & Nutley, S. (2008). Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: A method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation, 17, 163–173. doi: 10.3152/095820208X331720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nijnatten, C. (2013). Downgrading as a counterstrategy: A case study in child welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 18, 139–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organisation of conversational interaction (pp. 79–112). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen, J.-M. (2014). Emergency social workers navigating between computer and client. British Journal of Social Work [early view]. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D., & Heritage, J. (2014). Intervening with conversation analysis: The case of medicine. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 201–218. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2014.925658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2009). Identifying ‘the critical’ in a relationship-based model of reflection. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 349–362. doi: 10.1080/13691450902930761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187. doi: 10.1177/0957926597008002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2013a). Overcoming barriers to mediation in intake calls to services: Research-based strategies for mediators. Negotiation Journal, 29, 289–314. doi: 10.1111/nejo.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2013b). The (in)authenticity of simulated talk: Comparing role-played and actual conversation and the implications for communication training. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2013.780341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2014). The Conversation Analytic Role-play Method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to simulated role-play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 255–265. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2014.925663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2008). “Did you have permission to smash your neighbour's door?” Silly questions and their answers in police-suspect interrogations. Discourse Studies, 10, 89–111. doi: 10.1177/1461445607085592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. (2009). Pro-social modelling. European Journal of Probation, 1, 142–152. doi: 10.1177/206622030900100206
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, H., Gallagher, M., & Smith, M. (2012). A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact. Evidence & Policy, 8, 311–327. doi: 10.1332/174426412X654040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. (2013). Evidencing reflective practice in social work education: Theoretical uncertainties and practical challenges. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 154–172. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar