References

• Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Addams, J. (1910). Twenty years at Hull-house. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. (1923). The Hobo: The sociology of the homeless. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. (1986). The concept of cultural translation in British social anthropology. In C. James & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 141–164). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1995). Respuestas. Por una antropología reflexiva [Responses for a reflexive anthropology]. México: Grijalbo.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. G. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1–26). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. G., & Marcus, E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke, E. (1999). Theorien der Sozialen Arbeit. Eine Einführung [Theories of social work. An introduction]. Freiburg: Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, T. H. (2010). Small places, large issues: An introduction to social and cultural anthropology. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1997). Anthropology and development. International Social Science Journal, 49(154), 497–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00040.x
   Google Scholar
• European Association of Social Anthropologists. (2010). EASA-newsletter number 52. Retrieved October 12, 2013, from www.easaonline.org/downloads/newsletters/easa_news_52.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gable, E. (2014). The anthropology of guilt and rapport: Moral mutuality in ethnographic fieldwork. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 237–258. doi: 10.14318/hau4.1.010
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1995). Epilogue: Notes on the future of anthropology. In A. Ahmed & C. Shore (Eds.), The future of anthropology: Its relevance to the contemporary world (pp. 272–277). London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, A., & Hart, K. (1995). The rise and fall of scientific ethnography. In A. Ahmed & C. Shore (Eds.), The future of anthropology: Its relevance to the contemporary world (pp. 46–64). London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. (1986). Exploración de la Ciudad: Hacia una Antropología Urbana [Exploring the city: Inquiries toward an urban anthropology]. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2012). Definition of social work. Retrieved December 22, 2013, from http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Kleve, H. (2000). Die Sozialarbeit ohne Eigenschaften. Fragmente einer postmodernen Professions- und Wissenschaftstheorie Sozialer Arbeit [Social work without attributes. Fragments of a postmodern profession and a theory of social work science]. Freiburg: Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Kleve, H. (2002, September). Die postmoderne Theorie Sozialer Arbeit. Ein möglicher Blick auf die real- und theorie-historische Entwicklung der Sozialarbeit/Sozialpädagogik [The postmodern theory of social work. A possible view on real-historic and theoretical-historic development of social work]. Das gepfefferte Ferkel. Online-Journal für systemisches Denken und Handeln. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from www.ibs-networld.de/ferkel/sept-kleve.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, A. (1999). Culture. The anthropologists’ account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambek, M. (2010). Introduction. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language and action (pp. 1–36). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litscher, M. (2015). Vielfalt und städtische Entwicklungs- und Planungsprozesse: Forschen, mitreden, eingreifen. [Diversity and urban planning and development processes]. In M. Treiber, N. Grieβmeier, & H. Heider (Eds.), Ethnologie und Soziale Arbeit. Fremde Disziplinen, gemeinsame Fragen? (pp. 73–92) Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1973). Formen des Helfens im Wandel gesellschaftlicher Bedingungen [Forms of assistance within changing societal conditions]. In H. U. Otto & S. Schneider (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Perspektiven der Sozialen Arbeit. Erster Halbband (pp. 21–43). Neuwied: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Malagón, J. L., Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, J. L., & Barrera, E. (2008). Social work: Progress or backward movement? In G. J. Friesenhahn, V. Fortunato, & E. Kantowicz (Eds.), Social work in restructured European welfare systems (pp. 139–150). Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1967/1989). A diary in the strict sense of the term Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurus, S. (2015). Straβenkinder in Addis Ababa, Äthiopien—Eine interdisziplinäre Forschung [Street children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia—a interdisciñinary research]. In M. Treiber, N. Grieβmeier, & H. Heider (Eds.), Ethnologie und Soziale Arbeit. Fremde Disziplinen, gemeinsame Fragen? (pp. 165–180) Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, S. (Ed.). (2012). Critical anthropology: Foundational works. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati Manual. Retrieved November 18, 2013, from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/36/44/38235147.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, R. (1915). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment. The American Journal of Sociology, 20(5), 577–612.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeilstetter, R. (2012, November 21–23). Innovación docente en el marco del Plan Bolonia. Un análisis de casos [Teaching innovation in the context of the Bologna reform. A case study]. In I Congreso Virtual Internacional sobre Innovación Pedagógica y Praxis Educativa: INNOVAGOGÍA (Sevilla, Spain, pp. 628–634). Sevilla: AFOE.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeilstetter, R. (2015). Ethnologie und Soziale Arbeit. Über die Vorteile einer Zusammenarbeit für zwei periphere Disziplinen am Beispiel Spanien [Ethnology and social work. On the advantages of collaboration for two peripheral disciplines by looking at the Spanish example]. In M. Treiber, N. Grieβmeier, & H. Heider (Eds.), Ethnologie und Soziale Arbeit. Fremde Disziplinen, gemeinsame Fragen? (pp. 165–180) Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1986). Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In C. James & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 234–261) Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. New York, NY: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (2008). Audit culture and illiberal governance. Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278–298. doi: 10.1177/1463499608093815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub-Bernasconi, S. (1995a). Das fachliche Selbstverständnis Sozialer Arbeit—Wege aus der Bescheidenheit: Soziale Arbeit als Human Rights Profession [The professional self-understanding of social work—ways out of modesty: Social work as a human rights profession]. In W. R. Wendt (Ed.), Soziale Arbeit im Wandel ihres Selbstverständnisses: Beruf und Identität (pp. 57–104). Freiburg: Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Staub-Bernasconi, S. (1995b). Systemtheorie, soziale Probleme und Soziale Arbeit: lokal, national, international. Oder: Vom Ende der Bescheidenheit. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, E. (2015). Soziale Arbeit und Ethnologie in der Politikgestaltung mit Sinti [Social work and ethnology in the development of policies with Sinti]. In M. Treiber, N. Grieβmeier, & H. Heider (Eds.), Ethnologie und Soziale Arbeit. Fremde Disziplinen, gemeinsame Fragen? (pp. 49–71) Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Teicher, M. (1951). Anthropology and social work. Human Organization, 10(3), 22–24. doi: 10.17730/humo.10.3.e3841w2118237034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiber, M. (2012, March 23–24). Ethnologie als Bezugswissenschaft der Sozialen Arbeit. Über Kartographie, Freiraum und das Unmittelbare in Stadt und Welt [Ethnology as a reference discipline of social work. On cartography, free space and the immediate in the city and the world]. In Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziale Arbeit e. V., Frankfurt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Treiber, M., Grieβmeier N., & Heider H. (2015). Ethnologie und Soziale Arbeit. Fremde Disziplinen, gemeinsame Fragen? Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, W. R. (1995). Geschichte der Sozialen Arbeit [History of social work]. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. (1964). Anthropology. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar