References

• Al Channa, M. W., Stams, G. J., Bek, M., Damen, E. M., Asscher, J. J., & van der Laan, P. H. (2012). A meta-analysis of intensive family preservation programs: Placement prevention and improvement of family functioning. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1472–1479. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagdasaryan, S. (2005). Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 615–635. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardy, M., & Öhman, K. (2007). Vaativa vauvaperhetyö: Kirjallisuuskatsaus kansainvälisestä tutkimuksesta [Demanding work with families with infants. Review on international literature]. Helsinki: Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, B., & Moren, S. (2010). Explaining social work practice. The CAIMeR Theory. Journal of Social Work, 10, 98–119. doi: 10.1177/1468017309350661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boag-Munroe, G., & Evangelou, M. (2011). From hard to reach to how to reach: A systematic review of the literature on hard-to-reach families. Research Papers in Education, 27, 209–239. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2010.509515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Act. (417/2007). Retrieved from http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2007/en20070417
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., & Berry, M. (2002). Engaging families in child welfare services: An evidence-based approach to best practice. Child Welfare, 81, 293–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., & Arnkil, T. E. (2012). Huoli puheeksi. Opas varhaisista dialogeista [Taking up one's worries. A handbook on early dialogues] (8 painos). Helsinki: Sosiaali-ja terveysalan tutkimus-ja kehittämiskeskus (Stakes).
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skiveness, M. (2011). Changing patterns of response and emerging orientations. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child protection systems. International trends and orientations (pp. 243–257). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, U., & Kangas, O. (2010). Perhepiirissä [In the circle of the family]. Helsinki: Kelan tutkimusosasto.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., Pösö, T., Korpinen, J., Smith, C., & Whyte, S. (2004). What is child protection/lastensuojelu? Historical and methodologal issues in comparative research on lastensuojelu. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 28–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino, T. (2007). Keitä ovat lastensuojelun uudet asiakkaat? Tutkimus lapsista ja perheistä tilastolukujen takana [Who are the new children in child welfare? A study on children and families behind statistics]. Helsinki: Stakes työpapereita 30.
   Google Scholar
• Heino, T. (2008). Lastensuojelun avohuolto ja perhetyö: kehitys, nykytila, haasteet ja kehittämisehdotukset. Selvitys Lastensuojelun kehittämisohjelmalle [Open care in child welfare and family work: development, current state and suggestions for improvement]. Työpapereita 9. Helsinki: Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Hiitola, J. (2007). Lastensuojelun avohuollon asiakkuuksien lisätarkastelu. Jatkoa Tarja Heinon raportille “Keitä ovat uudet lastensuojelun asiakkaat” [Continuation study on the clienthood in open care child welfare based on Tarja Heino's study “Who are the clients in child welfare?]. Helsinki: Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtig, J. (2003). Lasta suojelemassa—etnografia lapsen paikan rakentumisesta lastensuojelun perhetyön käytännöissä [Protecting the child—ethnography on the construction of the child's place in child welfare family work]. Rovaniemi: Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 60.
   Google Scholar
• Jaakola, A.-M., Vornanen, R., & Pölkki, P. (2014). Kriittisten tapahtumien menetelmä lastensuojelun sosiaalityötä koskevassa tutkimuksessa [Critical incident method in child welfare research]. Janus, 22, 156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Kananoja, A. (2013). Toimiva lastensuojelu—selvitysryhmän loppuraportti [Effective child welfare—final report of evaluation group. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö]. Report 19. Helsinki: STM.
   Google Scholar
• Kuronen, M., & Lahtinen, P. (2010). Supporting families: The role of family work in child welfare. In H. Forsberg & K. Kröger (Eds.), Social work and child welfare. politics through Nordic lenses (pp. 65–81). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magura, S., & Moses, S. B. (1986). Outcome measures for child welfare services. Theory and applications. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, Janissa. (2013). Lastensuojelupalvelujen järjestäminen ja saatavuus Manner-Suomen kunnissa vuonna 2010. Helsinki: Suomen Kuntaliitto. (Organising and availability of child welfare services in Continental Finland). Retrieved from http://shop.kunnat.net/download.php?filename=uploads/lastensuojelupalvelut_ebook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P., Ghate, D., & van der Merwe, A. (2004). What works in parenting support? A review of the international evidence [Research Report 574). Department for Education and Skills. Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Myllärniemi, A. (2007). Lastensuojelun avohuollon perhetyö ammattikäytäntönä—jäsennyksiä perhetyöstä toimintatutkimuksen valossa [Family work in child welfare as professional practice—schemes of family work on the basis of action research]. Helsinki: Pääkaupunkiseudun sosiaalialan osaamiskeskus Socca & Heikki Waris -instituutti, 6.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2012). Valtiontalouden lastensuojelun tarkastuskertomus [Child welfare evaluation report by National Audit Office]. Retrieved from https://www.vtv.fi/files/3161/06_2012_lastensuojelu_netti.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pölkki, P., Vornanen, R., Miettinen, J., Jaakola, A-M., & Pohjanpalo, H. (2013). Critical factors and processes for effective child protection: Results and reflections on a Finnish research project. The 3rd European Conference for Social Work Research ECSWR. Transforming Welfare Policies and Practices. 20.-22.3.2013. University of Jyväskylä. Finland (poster presentation).
   Google Scholar
• Pölkki, P., Vornanen, R., Pursiainen, M., & Vepsäläinen, M. (2012). Children's participation in child protection processes as experienced by foster children and social workers. Child Care in Practice, 18, 107–125. doi: 10.1080/13575279.2011.646954
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, E. C. (2013). Relationship-based practice with families where child neglect is an issue: Putting relationship development under the microscope. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 455–470. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2013.814694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousu, S. (2006). Lastensuojelun tuloksellisuuden arviointi organisaatiossa. Näkymätön tuloksellisuus näkyväksi [Evaluation of effectiveness in organization. Invisible effectiveness into visible]. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 682.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child and Family Social Work, 10, 111–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00359.x
   Google Scholar
• Sipilä, J., & Österbacka, E. (2013). Enemmän ongelmien ehkäisyä, vähemmän korjailua? Perheitä ja lapsia tukevien palvelujen tuloksellisuus ja kustannusvaikuttavuus [More prevention of problems, less remediation? The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of child and family services]. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja.
   Google Scholar
• SOTKAnet Indicator Bank. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.sotkanet.fi/sotkanet/en/index
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T. (2010). Families with multiple problems: Some challenges in identifying and providing services to those experiencing adversities across the life course. Journal of Social Work, 11, 343–357. doi: 10.1177/1468017310379256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoburn, J. (2009). Effective interventions for complex families where there are concerns about, or evidence of, a child suffering significant harm. Safeguarding briefing. London: C4EO.
   Google Scholar
• Thoburn, J. (2010). Towards knowledge-based practice in complex child protection cases: A research-based expert briefing. Journal of Children's Services, 5, 9–24. doi: 10.5042/jcs.2010.0114
   Google Scholar
• Thoburn, J., Cooper, N., Brandon, M., & Connolly, S. (2013). The place of “think family" approaches in child and family social work: Messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyuse, S. W., Hong, P. O., & Trech, J. J. (2010). Evaluation of an intensive in-home family treatment program to prevent out-of-home placement. Journal of Evidence-based Social Work, 7, 200–218. doi: 10.1080/15433710902911063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vornanen, R., Pölkki, P., Pohjanpalo, H., & Miettinen, J. (2011). The possibilities for effective child protection—The Finnish research perspective. ERIS Web Journal, 1, 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J., & Nätkin, R. (2007). Perhetyön tieto [Knowledge in family work]. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Westlin, R., Haverinen, R., Ristikartano, V., Koivisto, J., & Malmivaara, A. (2005). Perheinterventioiden vaikuttavuus. Järjestelmällinen kirjallisuuskatsaus [The effectiveness of family interventions. A systematic literature review on controlled trials]. FinSoc arviointiraportti 5. Helsinki: Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2001). The origins of family systems work social workers’ contributions to the development of theory and practice. Australian Social Work, 54, 15–29. doi: 10.1080/03124070108414329
   Google Scholar