References

• Albers, D. (2001). Reclaiming social work: Why definitions matter. Paper presented at the Kentucky conference, “Re-Working the Working Definition,” Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. L. (1995). The social work dictionary (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers, NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, H. (1970). The common base of social work practice. New York, NY: National Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, H. M. (1958/2003). Working definition of social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(3), 267–270. doi: 10.1177/1049731503013003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Havis, S., Strathdee, G., Keaney, F., Manning, V., & Strang, J. (2004). Drug deaths in police custody: Is dual diagnosis a significant factor? Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 11, 173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2003.12.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butrym, Z. (1976). The nature of social work. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2004). Social work: Theory and practice for a changing profession. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, J. G. (2005). Habermas: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Flaker, V. (2003). An outline of social work methods: An introduction into the catalogue of tasks of social work centres. Ljubljana: Faculty for Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Flexner, A. (1915). Is social work a profession? In Proceedings of the national conference on charities and corrections, 1915 (pp. 576–590). Chicago, IL: Hildeman.
   Google Scholar
• Folgheraiter, F., & Raineri, M. L. (2012). A critical analysis of the social work definition according to the relational paradigm. International Social Work, 55, 473–487. doi: 10.1177/0020872812440588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulcher, L. C. (2003). The working theory on social work doesn’t work very well in China and Malaysia. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(3), 376–387. doi: 10.1177/1049731503013003012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2009). Questioning habermasian social work: A note on some alternative theoretical resources. British Journal of Social Work, 39(5), 867–883. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, W. E. (1962). A critique of the working definition. Social Work, 7(4), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Fook, J. (2004). The quest for a universal social work: Some issues and implications. Social Work Education, 23(5), 625–644. doi: 10.1080/0261547042000252334
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R. (2005). Redefining social work for the new millennium: Setting a context. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 11(1), 37–54. doi: 10.1300/J137v11n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, K., & Thiersch, H. (2009). The concept of the ‘lifeworld orientation’ for social work and social care. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(2), 131–146. doi: 10.1080/02650530902923643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981/1995). Theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981/1997). Theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalisation of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N. (2012). Appendix 1: International definition of social work (IFSW/IASSW). In K. Lyons, T. Hokenstad, M. Pawar, N. Huegler, & N. Hall (Eds.), SAGE handbook of international social work (pp. 492–493). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky, O. (2014). Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, I. (2004). Defining social work for the 21st century, the international federation of social workers’ revised definition of social work. International Social Work, 47(3), 407–424. doi: 10.1177/0020872804043973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Houston, S. (2007). “Lifeworld,” “system,” and family group conferences: Habermas’s contribution to discourse in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 37(6), 987–1006. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W-C. (2008). The transcendence and non-discursivity of the lifeworld. Human Studies, 31, 323–342. doi: 10.1007/s10746-008-9098-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holosko, M. J. (2003). The history of the working definition of practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(3), 271–283. doi: 10.1177/1049731503013003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, A., & Taylor, I. (2007). Defining the profession? Exploring an international definition of social work in the China context. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 382–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, H. (2006). Social work as integral profession. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1(2), 320–350.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, J. C. B. (2007). An international definition of social work in China. Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 391–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentz, W. (2004). Research as an element in social work’s ongoing search for identity. In R. Lovelock, K. Lyons, & J. Powell (Eds.), Reflecting on social work – discipline and profession (pp. 145–162). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelock, R. K., & Powell, J. (2004). Habermas/Foucault for social work: Practices of critical reflections. In R. Lovelock, K. Lyons & J. Powell (Eds.), (pp. 181–223). Reflecting on social work – discipline and profession. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mesec, B. (1990). O specifičnosti metodologije v socialnem delu, Teoretični koncepti socialnega dela in izobraževanje [On specificities of methodology in social work, theoretical concepts of social work and education]. Socialno delo, 29, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Miloševič, A. V., & Poštrak, M. (2003). Uvod v socialno delo [Introduction to social work ]. Ljubljana: Študentska založba.
   Google Scholar
• Minahan, A. (1981). Purpose and objectives of social work revisited. Social Work, 26, 5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, P. A. (1925). A definition of social work by Alice S. Cheyney: A review. Journal of Social Forces, 3(3), 557. doi: 10.2307/3005033
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, N. (2012). IFSW Social Work Definition Project. Report to the IFSW July 3rd, 2012. Retrieved November 8, 2015 from http://cdn.ifsw.org/assets/ifsw_85554-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2005). Modern social work theory (3rd ed.). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Peper, B., (1998) Sociale Problemen en de Moderne Samenleving. Een Cultuursociologische Beschouwing [Social problems and modern society. A treatise in the sociology of culture] (Doctoral thesis). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
   Google Scholar
• Quintero, M., & Flick, M. (2010). Co-occurring mental illness and developmental disabilities. Social Work Today, 10, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Risler, E., Lowe, L. A., & Nackerud, L. (2003). Defining social work: Does the working definition work today? Research on Social Work Practice, 13(3), 299–309. doi: 10.1177/1049731503013003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosaldo, R. (1993). Culture & truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schugurensky, D. (2014). Social pedagogy and critical theory: A conversation with Hans Thiersch. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 3(1), 4–14. Retrieved from http://www.internationaljournalofsocialpedagogy.com
   Google Scholar
• Sewpaul, V. (2007). Chalenging east-west value dichotomies and essentialising discourse on culture and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 398–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, R. A., Thackeray, M. G., & Farley, O. W. (1991). Introduction to social work (5th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thiersch, H. (1997). Lebensweltorientierte Soziale Arbeit. Online-Archiv von “SMIP - Streetwork / Mobile Jugendarbeit Infopool.” FH Potsdam. Retrieved August 11, 2015, from http://www.fh-potsdam.de/~Sozwes/projekte/steffan/final/eingang.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. C. (2003). Gordon versus the working definition: Lessons from a classic critique. Research on Social Work Practice, 13(3), 284–298. doi: 10.1177/1049731503013003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, U. M. (2003). Toward a third space: Improvisation and professionalism in social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 84(3), 317–322. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells H. (n.d.). Dual diagnosis skills training manual. Retrieved from August 22, 2015 from https://www.academia.edu/1741643/Dual_Diagnosis_Skills_Training_Manual
   Google Scholar
• Yip, K. (2004). A Chinese cultural critique of the global qualifying standards for social work education. Social Work Education, 23(5), 597–612. doi: 10.1080/0261547042000252316
   Google Scholar
• Zaviršek, D., & Lawrence, S. (2012). Social work in Europe. In K. Lyons, T. Hokenstad, M. Pawar, N. Huegler, & N. Hall (Eds.), The sage handbook of international social work (pp. 436–450). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, T. 2000 International Federation of Social Workers Definition of Social Work. IFSW Newsletter 2 p. 5 IFSW. Retrieved August 11, 2015, from http://cdn.ifsw.org/assets/ifsw_33158-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zink, T. 2003 Social work’s quest for a common conceptual framework, a seminal work for Richard Ramsay. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/sw/ramsay/papers2/Zink-03-sowk-quest-for-conceptual%20framework-1.html
   Google Scholar