References

• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Backlund, Å. (2007). Elevvård i grundskolan – Resurser, organisering och praktik. Diss. Stockholms universitet. Stockholm: US-AB Print Center.
   Google Scholar
• Berzin, S. C., & O’Connor, S. (2010). Educating today’s school social Workers: Are school social work courses responding to the changing contest? Children & Schools, 32(4), 237–249. doi: 10.1093/cs/32.4.237
   Google Scholar
• Blom, B., & Morén, S. (2010). Explaining social work practice – The CAIMeE theory. Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 98–119. doi: 10.1177/1468017309350661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. doi: 10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch-Armendariz, N., Busch Nsonwu, M., & Cook Heffron, L. (2014). A kaleidoscope: The role of the social work practitioner and the strength of social work theories and practice in meeting the complex needs of people trafficked and the professionals that work with them. International Social Work, 57(1), 7–18. doi: 10.1177/0020872813505630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew, R. (1979). The place of knowledge in social work activity. British Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, Y., Osmond, J., & Peile, C. (2002). Child welfare Workers’ use of theory in working with physical child abuses: Implication for professional supervision. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 83(1), 54–63. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellgran, P., & Höjer, S. (2003). Forskning i praktiken. Om den seniora forskningens innehåll och socionomers forskningsorientering. In I. B. Bergseth (ed.), Socialt arbete. En nationell genomlysning av ämnet. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
   Google Scholar
• Dupper, D. R., Rocha, C., Jackson, R. F., & Lodato, G. A. (2014). Broadly trained but narrowly used? Factors that predict the performance of environmental versus preventative tasks by school social workers. Children & Schools, 36(2), 71–176. doi: 10.1093/cs/cdu004
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, C., & Kelly, M. S. (2009). Becoming evidence-informed in the real world of school social work practice. Children & Schools, 31(1), 46–56. doi: 10.1093/cs/31.1.46
   Google Scholar
• Frey, A. J., & Dupper, D. R. (2005). A broader conceptual approach to clinical practice for the 21st century. Children & Schools, 27(1), 33–44. doi: 10.1093/cs/27.1.33
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2007). Views of evidence-based practice: Social workers’ code of ethics and accreditation standards as guides for choice. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(3), 447–462. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2007.200600639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2005). Social work theories in context. Creating framework for practice. Chippenham and Eastbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, C. (2014). Skolkuratorers handlingsutrymme – gränser, legitimitet och jurisdiktion. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 1, 47–66. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, C., & Larsson, A. (2012). Skolkuratorsyrkets framväxt och utveckling i Sverige. Socionomens forskningssupplement, 32(6), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, M. J. (1931). The scientific basis of social work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, S. A., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novus. (2012). www-akademssr.se (20140603).
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, E., & Ljunghill, J. (1997). The practitioner and ‘naive theory’ in social work intervention processes. British Journal of Social Work, 27, 931–950. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmond, J., & O’Connor, I. (2004). Formalizing the unformalised: Practitioners’ communication of knowledge in practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(5), 677–692. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmond, J., & O’Connor, I. (2006). Use of theory and research in social work practice: Implications for knowledge-based practice. Australian Social Work, 59(1), 5–19. doi: 10.1080/03124070500449747
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2005). Modern social work theory (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perlinski, M., Blom, B., & Morén, S. (2012). Getting a sense of the client: Working methods in the personal social services in Sweden. Journal of Social Work, 13(5), 508–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & White, S. H. (1981). Knowledge for practice. Social Service Review, 55(1), 1–41. doi: 10.1086/643889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, A. (1994). Knowledge use in direct practice. Social Service Review, 68(4), 561–577. doi: 10.1086/604084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS. (2010). 800. Ny skollag.
   Google Scholar
• Socialdepartementet. (2010). Plattform för arbete med att utveckla en evidensbaserad praktik i socialtjänsten [Platform for the work to develop evidence-based practice in social services]. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. (2011). Evidensbaserad praktik I socialtjänsten 2007 och 2010 [Evidence-based practice in social services in 2007 and 2010], Socialstyrelsen (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Soydan, H. (2010). Evidence and policy: The case of social care services in Sweden. The Policy Press, 6(2), 179–173.
   Google Scholar