References

• Bakhtin, M. (1963/1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics ( C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M., & Holquist, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Vol. 1). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvin, J.-M. (2008). Activation policies, new modes of governance and the issue of responsibility. Social Policy and Society, 7, 367–377. doi:10.1017/S1474746408004338
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, V., & Van Berkel, R. (2007). Individualised service provision in an era of activation and new governance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 413–424. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00635
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, C. (2011). Reconciling paternalism and empowerment in clinical practice: An intersubjective perspective. Social Work, 56, 33–41. doi:10.1093/sw/56.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2010). Active labour market policy evaluations: A meta-analysis. The Economic Journal, 120, F452–F477. doi:10.3386/w16173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—Theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11, 407–423. doi:10.1007/s11115-010-014
   Google Scholar
• Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (2006). Beyond activation reform in European unemployment protection systems in post-industrial labour markets. European Societies, 8, 527–553. doi:10.1080/14616690601002582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Work and Inclusion. (2006). Work, welfare and social inclusion ( White Paper No. 9, 2006–2007). Oslo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Djuve, A. B., & Kavli, H. C. (2015). Facilitating user involvement in activation programmes: When carers and clerks meet pawns and queens. Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunno, A. (2013). Activation workers’ perceptions of their long-term unemployed clients’ attitudes towards employment. Journal of Social Policy, 42, 799–817. doi:10.1017/S0047279413000317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, E. (2009). How do placements in kinship care compare with those in non-kin foster care: Placement patterns, progress and outcomes? Child & Family Social Work, 14(3), 331–342. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, E., & Lutman, E. (2014). Working effectively with neglected children and their families—What needs to change? Child Abuse Review, 23, 262–273. doi:10.1002/car.2330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D. R. (2011). Welfare reform, Jobcentre Plus and the street-level bureaucracy: Towards inconsistent and discriminatory welfare for severely disadvantaged groups? Social Policy and Society, 10, 445–458. doi:10.1017/S1474746411000200
   Google Scholar
• Freedland, M., & King, D. (2003). Contractual governance and illiberal contracts: Some problems of contractualism as an instrument of behaviour management by agencies of government. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 465–477. doi:10.1093/cje/27.3.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, J. F. (2005). Myth and ceremony in workfare: Rights, contracts, and client satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34, 101–124. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.056
   Google Scholar
• Hjörne, E., Juhila, K., & Van Nijnatten, C. (2010). Negotiating dilemmas in the practices of street-level welfare work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 303–309. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessen, J. T., & Tufte, P. A. (2014). Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 43, 269–288. doi:10.1017/S0047279413000998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, J., Blomberg, H., & Kroll, C. (2013). Social workers’ attitudes towards the unemployed in the Nordic countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 219–229. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, E., & Grady, M. (2014). From silos to scaffolding: Engaging and effective social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42(2), 193–204. doi:10.1007/s10615-014-0490-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killick, C., & Taylor, B. J. (2012). Judgements of social care professionals on elder abuse referrals: A factorial survey. British Journal of Social Work, 42(5), 814–832. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluve, J. (2010). The effectiveness of European active labor market programs. Labour Economics, 17, 904–918. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2006). Motivation, agency, and public policy: Of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liljegren, A. (2012). Pragmatic professionalism: Micro-level discourse in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15, 295–312. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.543888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service ( 30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, E., Maher, E., McRoy, R., Ward, K., Peveto, L., & Stanley, A. (2012). Family reunification of youth in foster care with complex mental health needs: Barriers and recommendations. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 29(3), 221–240. doi:10.1007/s10560-012-0257-1
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg-Heimonen, I. E. (2015). Social workers’ training evaluated by a cluster-randomized study: Reemployment for welfare recipients? Research on Social Work Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049731515569357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2012). Getting beyond ‘heroic agency’ in conceptualising social workers as policy actors in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 1022–1038. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotná, G. (2014). Competing institutional logics in the development and implementation of integrated treatment for concurrent disorders in Ontario: A case study. Journal of Social Work, 14(3), 260–278. doi:10.1177/1468017313476613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmond, J. (2006). A quest for form: The tacit dimension of social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 9, 159–181. doi:10.1080/13691450600723013
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A. (2014). Causality and causal inference in social work: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 540–547. doi:10.1177/1049731514536056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14, 177–194. doi:10.1080/13691450903471229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P., & Dierckx, D. (2012). To work or not to work? The role of the organisational context for social workers’ perceptions on activation. British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räsänen, J.-M. (2012). Producing norm talk of fact-based case recording in interviews with emergency social workers. Qualitative Social Work, 11(1), 6–22. doi:10.1177/1473325011400482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønsen, M., & Skarphamar, T. (2009). Do welfare-to-work initiatives work? Evidence from an activation programme targeted at social assistance recipients in Norway. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 61–77. doi:10.1177/0958928708098524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røysum, A. (2012). The reform of the welfare services in Norway: One office–one way of thinking? European Journal of Social Work, 16, 708–723. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.722982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, R. (2008). Administrative justice, discretion and the ‘welfare to work’ project. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 30, 323–338. doi:10.1080/09649060802580995
   Google Scholar
• Sawrikar, P., & Katz, I. (2014). ‘Normalizing the novel’: How is culture addressed in child protection work with ethnic-minority families in Australia? Journal of Social Service Research, 40(1), 39–61. doi:10.1080/01488376.2013.845126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood-Johnson, F. (2014). A different kind of practice? Meanings attached by practitioners to the idea of ‘adult protection’. Journal of Social Work, 14(5), 473–490. doi:10.1177/1468017313479857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Services in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration Law. § 2009-12-18-131 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2012). Models for professional judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 546–562. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.702310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. (2013). Paperwork first, not work first: How caseworkers use paperwork to feel effective. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40(1), 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008). Assumptive worlds and images of agency: Academic social policy in the twenty-first century? Social Policy and Society, 7, 269–280. doi:10.1017/S1474746408004259
   Google Scholar
• Toerien, M., Sainsbury, R., Drue, P., & Irvine, A. (2013). Putting personalisation into practice: Work-focused interviews in Jobcentre Plus. Journal of Social Policy, 42, 309–327. doi:10.1017/S0047279412000980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R., & Marston, G. (2015). Street-level perceptions of procedural rights for young unemployed people—A comparative study between Sweden and Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 394–411. doi:10.1111/spol.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R. (2011). The local and street-level production of social citizenship: The case of Dutch social assistance. In S. Betzelt, & S. Bothfeld (Eds.), Activation and labour market reforms in Europe. Challenges to social citizenship (pp. 195–217). Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., & Van der Aa, P. (2012). Activation work: Policy programme administration or professional service provision? Journal of Social Policy, 41, 493–510. doi:10.1017/S0047279412000062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., Van der Aa, P., & Van Gestel, N. (2010). Professionals without a profession? Redesigning case management in Dutch local welfare agencies. European Journal of Social Work, 13, 447–463. doi:10.1080/13691451003603455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. (2012). Measuring social workers’ judgements: Why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgements. Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 364–384. doi: 10.1177/1468017310387463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar