References

• Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1997). Work, consumerism and the new poor. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinder, M. (2006). Handlingsutrymmets betydelse för arbetslösas upplevelser, handlingsstrategier och jobbchanser [ The importance of freedom of action for unemployed peoples’ experiences, strategies and job opportunities]. Akademisk avhandling 42. Sociologiska institutionen. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, E., & Lorentzen, T. (2003). Dynamics of social assistance: The Norwegian experience in comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 289–301. doi: 10.1111/1467-9671.00283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, V. (2005). Individens ansvar och samhällets stöd. En utvärdering av ‘Skärholmsmodellen’ vid Jobbcentrum sydväst [Personal responsibility and societal support. An evaluation of the ‘Skärholmsmodel’ at Job Centre South-West]. FoU-rapport 2005:10. FoU-enheten. Stockholms stad.
   Google Scholar
• Ervik, R., Kildal, N., & Nilssen, E. (2016). Introduction. In: R. Ervik, N. Kildal, & E. Nilssen (Eds.), New contractualism in European welfare state policies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, I. (2005). Why work? Comparative studies on welfare regimes and individuals’ work orientations [Dissertations Series No 64]. Swedish Institute for Social Research. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1998). The third way. The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. doi: 10.2307/2092623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. (1996). Mestring av marginalitet—Å leve og overleve som sosialklient [Coping marginalization—to live and survive as a recipient of public economic support]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. (1999). Arbeidsløshet som sosialt problem. Oslo: Unemployment as social problem.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1996). A theory of poverty and social exclusion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Jordan, C. (2000). Social work and the third way. Tough love as social policy. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kildal, N. (Ed.). (2001). Den nya sociala frågan. Om arbete, inkomst och rättvisa [The new societal question. About work, income and justice]. Göteborg. Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellevold, A. (1995). Sosialhjelp på vilkår. Om bruk av vilkår og avtaler ved tildeling av sosiale ytelser [Conditional economic benefits. On the use of conditions and contracts in social security programs]. Oslo: Juridisk Forlag A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørstad, M. (2005). Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality. The challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare policy. European Journal of Social Work, 8, 381–398. doi: 10.1080/13691450500314459
   Google Scholar
• Kjørstad, M. (2008). Et kritisk, realistisk perspektiv på sosialt arbeid i forvaltningen. En studie av sosialarbeideres iverksetting av arbeidslinjen i norsk sosialpolitikk [A critical realist perspective on social work in the public services. A study of social workers’ implementation of workfare in Norwegian social policy] (Dissertation NTNU 2008:308). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Applied Social Science, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy—dilemmas of the individual in the public services. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Johannessen, A. (2005). Tiltaksforsøket: mot en inkluderende arbeidslinje? Sluttrapport fra evaluering av Forsøk med kommunalt ansvar for aktive, arbeidsretta tiltak for langtidsmottakere av sosialhjelp 2000-2004. [‘ Tiltaksforsøket’: Towards an inclusive workfare? Final report of the evaluation of Program for municipal responsibility for active, workfare actions for long term recipients of social economic benefits]. Oslo: Oslo University College.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). An offer you can’t refuse [ Workfare in international perspective]. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg-Heimonen, I. (2005). Public welfare policies and private responses—studies of European labor market policies in transition (Dissertation). Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1969 [1925]). The gift. London: R&KP.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, L. M. (1992). The new politics of poverty: The nonworking poor in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Midré, G. (1995). Bot, bedring eller brød? Om bedømming og behandling av sosial nød fra reformasjonen til velferdsstaten [ Penance, recovery or bread? Assessment and treatment of social misery from the Reformation to the welfare state]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, P. (2006). Arbete i stället för bidrag? Om aktiveringskraven i socialtjänsten och effekten för de arbetslösa bidragstagarna [Work instead of economic benefits? The demand for activity and the impact for users] (Dissertation). Akademisk avhandling. Sociologiska institutionen. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter. The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2001). Politik som organisation. Förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem [ Politics as organization. The basic problem of policies of public administration]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen, T. (2006). Socialt arbete med arbetslösa, I Denvall, V. (Ed.) 2006, Nytta & Fördärv. Socialt arbete i kritisk belysning [Social work with unemployed people. In Denvall, V. (Ed.) 2006, Usefulness and misery. A critical view on social work]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. (2000). Review article: Social rights and social contract—political theory and the new welfare politics. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 507–532. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar