References

• Bargain, O., Immervoll, H., & Viitamäki, H. (2012). No claim, no pain: Measuring the non-take-up of social assistance using register data. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(3), 375–395. doi: 10.1007/s10888-010-9158-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Å. (2013). Ekonomiskt bistånd – en urholkad stödform [Social assistance – a weakened benefit]. Socionomens forskningssupplement, 34, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Å, & Bäckman, O. (2007). Socialbidragstagandets dynamik: Varaktighet och utträden från socialbidragstagande under 2000-talet [The dynamics of means-tested social assistance take-up – duration and exits from social assistance benefits in the 2000s]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 14(2–3), 134–152.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Å, & Lundström, T. (2000). Kunskaper och kunskapssyn – om socialarbetare inom socialtjänsten [Knowledge among social workers in PSS]. Socionomens forskningssupplement, 12, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, D., & Bostic, A. (2015). Paradoxes of social policy: Welfare transfers, relative poverty and redistribution preferences. American Sociological Review, 80(2), 268–298. doi: 10.1177/0003122415573049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canvin, K., Jones, C., Marttila, A., Burström, B., & Whitehead, M. (2007). Can I risk using public services? Perceived consequences of seeking help and health care among households living in poverty: Qualitative study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(11), 984–989. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.058404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, K. (2002). Single motherhood, employment, or social assistance: Why are U.S. women poorer than women in other affluent nations? Journal of Poverty, 6(2), 61–80. doi: 10.1300/J134v06n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Chzhen, Y., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). Lone parents, poverty and policy in the European Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 487–506. doi: 10.1177/0958928712456578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellgran, P., & Höjer, S. (2005). Rörelser i tiden. Professionalisering och privatisering i socialt arbete [Movements in our times. Professionalization and privatization in social work]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 12(2-3), 246–267.
   Google Scholar
• Dennison, S. (2002). Integrating standardized measures into social work practice: An exploratory study of BSW, MSW, and continuing education curricula. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5(2), 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2007). Direct payments and social work practice: The significance of ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy’ in determining eligibility. British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), 405–422. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2013). Organisational rules and discretion in adult social work. British Journal of Social Work, 43(4), 739–758. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-Level Bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fäldt, J., & Kullberg, C. (2012). Implications of male and female same-gender dyads. Journal of social service research, 38(5), 712–726. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2012.723976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fording, R. C., Soss, S., & Schram, F. S. (2007). Devolution, discretion, and the effect of local political values on TANF sanctioning. Social Service Review, 81(2), 285–316. doi: 10.1086/517974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Bill 2000/01:80 Ny socialtjänstlag m.m [A new Social Services Act, etc.].
   Google Scholar
• Grell, P., Ahmadi, N., & Blom, B. (2013). Hur inverkar organisationsstrukturen på socialtjänstens klientarbete? En sammanfattning av kunskapsläget [What impact does the organizational structure have on work with clients in the social services? A research review]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 20(3-4), 222–240.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, B. (2002). Assessing non-use of social assistance. European Journal of Social Work, 5(2), 149–158. doi: 10.1080/03069887700760181
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, B. (2013). Social assistance among immigrants and natives in Sweden. International Journal of Manpower, 34(2), 126–141. doi: 10.1108/01437721311320654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, B., Hydén, L. C., & Salonen, T. (1993). Decision-making on social assistance in major cities in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 2(4), 197–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.1993.tb00039.x
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., (ed.). (2010). Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, L.-C. (1996). Att besluta om socialbidrag. Förändringar av beslut och attityder till socialbidrag 1990-1994 [Decisions on social welfare benefits. Changes in decisions and attitudes to benefits 1990-1994]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 3, 180–194.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, L-C., Kyhle Westermark, P., & Stenberg, S-Å. (1995). Att besluta om socialbidrag. En studie i 11 kommuner [Deciding on social assistance.]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellbom, P. (2009). Rättssäkerhet och flexibilitet i kommunala riktlinjer [Legal rights and flexibility in municipal guidelines]. Retfærd, Nordisk juridisk tidskrift, 32(4/127), 80–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, C. (2005). Differences in the seriousness of problems and deservingness of help: Swedish Social Workers’ assessments of single mothers and fathers. British Journal of Social Work, 35(3), 373–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, C., & Fäldt, J. (2008). Gender differences in social workers’ assessments and help-giving strategies towards single parents. European Journal of Social Work, 11(4), 445–458. doi: 10.1080/13691450802075659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H., (eds.). (2001). An offer you can’t Refuse. Workfare in an international perspective. Southampton: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg-Heimonen, I. (2011). The effects of Family Group Conferences on social support and mental health for longer-term social assistance recipients in Norway. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 949–967.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg-Heimonen, I. E. (2015). Social workers’ training evaluated by a Cluster-randomized study reemployment for welfare recipients? Research on Social Work Practice. doi:10.1177/1049731515569357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minas, R. (2005). Administrating poverty – studies of intake organization and social assistance in Sweden (diss.). Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Mood, C. (2011). Lagging behind in good times: Immigrants and the increased dependence on social assistance in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 55–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood, C. (2013). Social Assistance dynamics in Sweden: Duration dependence and heterogeneity. Social Science Research, 42(1), 120–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NBHW (2014a). Ekonomiskt bistånd årsstatistik 2013. Belopp samt antal biståndsmottagare och antal biståndshushåll [Social assistance: 2013 County and Municipal Expenditures]. Stockholm: NBHW.
   Google Scholar
• NBHW (2014b). Evidensbaserad praktik i socialtjänsten 2007, 2010 och 2013 [Evidence-based paractice in PSS, 2007, 2010 and 2013]. Stockholm: NBHW.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (2004). Mechanisms of poverty alleviation: Anti-poverty effects of non-means-tested and means-tested benefits in five welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(4), 371–390. doi: 10.1177/0958928704046879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybom, J. (2012). Aktivering av socialbidragstagare – om stöd och kontroll i socialtjänsten [Activation of social assistance claimants – support and control] (diss.), Stockholm, Stockholm University, Department of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., & Laakso, R. (2014). Matching children and substitute homes: Some theoretical and empirical notions. Child & Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starrin, B., Kalander Blomkvist, M., & Jansson, S. (2003). Socialbidragstagande och statusbunden skamkänsla – en prövning av ekonomi-sociala band modellen [Social assistance and status-bound shame.]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 10(1), 24–47.
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H. (2007). Utrymme för variation – om prövning av socialbidrag [Scope for variations – on assessments of social assistance eligibility] (diss.), Stockholm, Stockholm University, Department of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H., & Wiklund, S. (2011). I välfärdssamhällets marginal: om socialbidragstagande bland ensamstående mödrar av svensk och utländsk härkomst [In the margins of the Swedish welfare state: Social assistance recipiency among lone mothers of native and non-native origin]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 18(1), 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H., & Wiklund, S. (2013). One for All or All for One? The collaboration of Swedish Personal Social Services with regard to Lone Mothers on Social Assistance. British Journal of Social work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stranz, H., Wiklund, S., & Karlsson, P. (2016). People processing in Swedish personal social services. On the individuals, their predicaments and the outcomes of organisational screening. Nordic Social Work Research, 6(3), 174–187.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2012). Models for professional judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 546–562. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.702310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terum, L-I. (1986). Geografisk ulikskap og nasjonale normer [Geographic differences and national norms]. Oslo: Inas.
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, K. (2008). Activation policy in action. A Street-level study of social assistance in the Swedish Welfare State (diss.), Chicago, University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Yelland, L. N., Salter, A. B., & Ryan, P. (2011). Performance of the modified poisson regression approach for estimating relative risks from clustered prospective data. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174(8), 984–992. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagel, H. (2013). Are all single mothers the same? Evidence from British and West German Women’s Employment Trajectories. European Sociological Review, 1–15. doi:10.1093/esr/jct021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, G. (2004). A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with Binary data. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159(7), 702–706. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar