Linking family engagement with a rights perspective: macro factors influencing practice

References

• Adoption and Safe Families Act. (1997). P.L. 105–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bainham, A. (2005). Children: The modern law (3rd ed.). Bristol, UK: Family Law.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, N. (2007). Social work practice in conflict-ridden areas: Cultural sensitivity is not enough. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 873–891. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2002). Promoting children’s rights through the use of relationship. Child and Family Social Work, 7, 1–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00225.x
   Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., Mónica Lópezc, M., Devaney, J., Spratt, T., Koopmans, C., … Hayes, D. (2015). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, H., Carr, N., & Whelan, S. (2011). Like walking on eggshells: Service user views and expectations of the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 16, 101–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buford, G. (2000). Advancing innovations: Family group decision making as community-centered child and family work. Protecting Children, 16, 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, Social Exclusion Task Force. (2008). Think family: Improving the life chances of families at risk. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, G., & Freymond, N. (2006). Understanding international comparisons of child protection, family service, and community systems of child and family welfare. In N. Fraymond & G. Cameron (Eds.), Towards positive systems of child and family welfare (pp. 3–26). Toronto: Toronto University Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. (2006). What’s right for children? Emory International Law Review, 20, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2012). For the welfare of children: Lessons learned from class action litigation. Washington, DC: CSSP.
   Google Scholar
• Cocozza, M., & Hort, S. E. O. (2011). The dark side of the universal welfare state: Child abuse and protection in Sweden. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child protection systems: International trends and orientations (pp. 89–111). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. P. (1992). The relevance of theories of natural law and legal positivism. In M. Freeman & P. Veerman (Eds.), The ideologies of children’s rights (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (1993). The comparative method. In A. W. Finifter (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 105–119). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. E., Amodeo, M., & Clay, C. M. (2007). Training as a factor in policy implementation: Lessons from a national evaluation of child welfare training. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1487–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. E., Kim, S. H., Clay, C., & Perlstein, J. (2009). Addressing issues of globalization in the training of public child welfare workers: Lessons from a training program in the United States. International Social Work, 52(1), 72–83. doi: 10.1177/0020872808097752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, M., & Williams, M. (Eds.). (2006). Global perspectives on family foster care. Dorset: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E., & Davis, A. (2007). Social work – voices from the inside. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (2011). Welfare. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damman, J. (2014). Birth parent involvement: Developing indicators to establish meaningful involvement. Conference paper, Kansas University, 14 November.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, Y., Healy, K., & Feeney, J. A. (2010). Challenges in implementing participatory practice in child protection: A contingency approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1020–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, J., & Bigmore, J. (2009). Introducing child care social work: Contemporary policy and practice. Essex: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Every child matters: Change for children in social care. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M. (2009). A comparative study of policy approach for child protection in Goa and Singapore. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detrick, S. (1999). A commentary on the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Doe, S. S. (2000). Cultural factors in child maltreatment and domestic violence in Korea. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 231–236. doi: 10.1016/S0190-7409(00)00077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2005). Pluralism in divided societies – citizenship education and social work with care experienced young people in Northern Ireland. In A. Ross (Eds.), Teaching Citizenship (pp. 313–320). London: Cice.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2008). Looking out from the middle: User involvement in health and social care in Northern Ireland. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2012). Service user involvement in teaching about conflict – an exploration of the issues. International Social Work (Special Edition on Social Work and Armed Conflict), 55, 720–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., & Collins, M. E. (2010). Macro impacts on caseworker decision-making in child welfare: A cross-national comparison. European Journal of Social Work, 13, 35–54. doi: 10.1080/13691450903135618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., & Hayes, D. (2012). Social work students learn about social work values from service users and carers. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6, 368–385. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2012.654497
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2005). Working with violence, the emotions and the psycho-social dynamics of child protection: Reflections on the Victoria Climbié case. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 24, 781–795. doi: 10.1080/02615470500238702
   Google Scholar
• Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act. (2008). P.L. 110–351.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., & Veerman, P. (Eds.). (1992). The ideologies of children’s rights. London: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, C. E., Kemp, S. P., & Marcenko, M. O. (2008). The connections project: A relational approach to engaging birth parents in visitation. Child Welfare, 87, 5–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. (1997). Combating child abuse. International perspectives and trends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glendon, M. A. (1992). Rights in twentieth-century constitutions. University of Chicago Law Review, 59, 519–538. doi: 10.2307/1599944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, T. J. (2006). The religious right and the opposition to U.S. ratification of the convention on the rights of the child. Emory International Law Review, 20, 112–128.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Spratt, T. (2009). Child welfare interventions: Patterns of social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 39(8), 1575–1597. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. S., Stokes, C., Byoun, S. J., Furuto, S. B. C. L., & Kim, Y. S. (2011). Integrating cultural competency in South Korean social work education. International Social Work, 56, 180–192. doi: 10.1177/0020872811418995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höjer, S., & Forkby, T. (2011). Care for sale: The influence of new public management in child protection in Sweden. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 93–110. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowitt, M., & O’Loughlin, S. (2005). Social work with children and families. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, S. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2010). Experiences of family maltreatment by Korean children in Korean national protective services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34, 18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. L., & Weissbourd, B. (Eds.). (1994). Putting families first: America’s family support movement and the challenge of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, I., & Hetherington, R. (2006). Co-operating and communicating: A European perspective on integrating services for children. Child Abuse Review, 15, 429–439. doi: 10.1002/car.965
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, E., Hyvönen, U., & Nygren, L. (2002). Child welfare or child protection: Uncovering Swedish and Canadian orientations to social intervention in child maltreatment. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 451–471. doi: 10.1177/14733250260620865
   Google Scholar
• Kim, U., Park, Y. S., Kwon, Y. E., & Koo, J. (2005). Values of children, parent-child relationship, and social change in Korea: Indigenous, cultural, and psychological analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 338–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, D. (2009). Child social work policy and practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M. (2003). From ‘a coalition of despair’ to ‘a covenant of help” in social work with families in distress. European Journal of Social Work, 6, 273–282. doi: 10.1080/1369145032000167255
   Google Scholar
• Laming. (2003). The Victoria Climbié inquiry report. Sixth report of session 2002–03. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. J. (2007). Adoption in Korea: Current status and future prospects. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. E. (2011). Fifty years of the Child Welfare Act [in Korean]. Hankook-ilbo (1/17/2011). Retrieved January 14, 2011, from www.hankooki.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2007). Voice is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 927–942. doi: 10.1080/01411920701657033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manful, E., & McCrystal, P. (2010). Conceptualisation of children's rights: What do child care professionals in Northern Ireland say? Child Care in Practice, 16, 83–97. doi:10.1080/13575270903381744
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. A. (2005). The U.S. and the international children’s rights crusade: Leader or laggard? Journal of Social History, 38, 955–963. doi: 10.1353/jsh.2005.0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1998). Family-centered services: Approaches and effectiveness. The Future of Children, 8, 54–71. doi: 10.2307/1602628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mildred, J., & Plummer, C. A. (2009). Responding to child sexual abuse in the United States and Kenya: Child protection and children’s rights. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischen, P. A. (2008). The impact of child and family service reviews on knowledge management. Child Welfare, 87, 125–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L., Thomas, M. L., & Parker, B. (2014). The children and family services review. In G. P. Mallon & P. M. Hess (Eds.), Child welfare for the 21st century: A handbook of practices, policies, and programs (2nd ed., pp. 567–582). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, K., Brandon, M., & Tudor, P. (2015). Rights, responsibilities and pragmatic practice: Family participation in case reviews. Child Abuse Review, 24, 198–209. doi: 10.1002/car.2272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child centred system. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). (2006). Recommendation proposal on national action plans for the promotion and protection of human rights (NAP). Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Norström, C., & Thunved, A. (1996). Nya Sociallagarna – med kommentarer, lagaroch författningar som de lyder den 1 juli 1996 [The New Social Laws – with Commentary, Laws and Statutes effective 1 July 1996]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson Hort, S. E. (1997). Toward a deresidualization of Swedish child welfare policy and practice. In N. Gilbert (Eds.), Combatting child abuse: International perspectives and trends (pp. 105–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2009). From Seebohm to Think Family: Reflections on 40 years of policy change of statutory children’s social work in England. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 68–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2011). Child protection and safeguarding in England: Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 854–875. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2014). The politics of child protection. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2006). What is professional social work? Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, J. (2008). States of leaving care: Towards international exchange as a global resource. In M. Stein, & E. R. Munro (Eds.), Young people’s transitions from care to adulthood: International research and practice (pp. 241–257). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rauktis, M. E., McCarthy, S., Krackhardt, D., & Cahalane, H. (2010). Innovation in child welfare: The adoption and implementation of family group decision making in Pennsylvania. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 732–739. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Representing Children Worldwide (RCW). (2005). How children’s voice are heard in child protective proceedings. Retrieved January 13, 2011, from www.law.yale.edu/rcw/jurisdictions/ase/repofkorea/frontpagel.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, R., & De Bie, M. (2008). Children’s rights: A challenge for social work. International Social Work, 51, 37–46. doi: 10.1177/0020872807083914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., Van Houte, S., Vandenhole, W., & Reynaert, D. (2013). From parental engagement to the engagement of social work services: Discussing reductionist and democratic forms of partnership with families. Child and Family Social Work, 18(4), 449–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleeby, D. (Ed.). (2006). The strengths perspective in social work practice (4h ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon/Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, J. L. (2012). The United Nations convention on the rights of the child as policy and strategy for social work action in child welfare in the United States. Social Work, 57, 11–22. doi: 10.1093/sw/swr006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamai, M. (1999). Experiencing and coping with stress of political uncertainty: Gender differences among mental health professionals. Families in Society, 1, 41–50. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.638
   Google Scholar
• Shin, C., & Shaw, I. (2003). Social policy in South Korea: Cultural and structural factors in the emergence of welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 328–341. doi: 10.1111/1467-9515.00343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Gallagher, M., Wosu, H., Stewart, J., Cree, V. E., Hunter, S., … Wilkinson, H. (2012). Engaging with involuntary service users in social work: Findings from a knowledge exchange project. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1460–1477. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2008). Social work and power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spolander, G., Pullen-Sansfaçon, A., Brown, M., & Engelbrecht, L. (2011). Social work education in Canada, England and South Africa: A critical examination of curriculums and programmes. International Social Work, 54, 816–831. doi: 10.1177/0020872810389086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, T., & Callan, J. (2004). Parents’ views on social work interventions in child welfare cases. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 199–224. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell, K., Vinnerljung, B., & Ryburn, M. (2001). Social workers’ attitudes towards family group conferences in Sweden and the UK. Child and Family Social Work, 6, 327–336. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2001.00216.x
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J. (2006). Understanding power and powerlessness: Towards a framework for emancipatory practice in social work. Journal of Social Work, 6, 33–51. doi: 10.1177/1468017306062222
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2012). Social work skills and knowledge: A practice handbook (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. (2006). Working with involuntary clients – A guide to practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Waites, C., Macgowan, M., Pennell, J., Carlton-LaNey, I., & Weil, M. (2004). Increasing the cultural responsiveness of family group conferencing. Social Work, 49, 291–300. doi: 10.1093/sw/49.2.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., & Welbourne, P. (2008). The professionalization of social work: A cross-national exploration. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 281–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissbrodt, D. (2006). Prospects for ratification of the convention on the rights of the child. Emory International Law Review, 20, 210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2011). The UNCRC and social workers’ relationships with young children. Child Abuse Review, 20, 395–406. doi:10.1002/car.1203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2014). Understanding and supporting young children’s transitions into State care: Schlossberg’s transition framework and child-centred practice. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 401–417. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, R., Biesel, K., & Heinitz, S. (2011). Child protection in an age of uncertainty: Germany’s response. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child protection systems: International trends and orientations (pp. 183–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfson, R. C., Heffernan, E., Paul, M., & Brown, M. (2010). Young people’s views of the child protection system in Scotland. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2069–2085. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. (2001). Kinship care of the abused child: The New Zealand experience. Child Welfare, 80, 497–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. N., & Shin, C. S. (2008). Parental attitudes towards education: What matters for children’s well-being? Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1328–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. M. (1997). Concepts of child abuse and neglect. A survey of the general public and professionals about their perceptions of social interventions concerning child maltreatment. Korean Journal of Social Welfare [in Korean], 31, 393–422.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., McKenzie, M., Schjelderup, L., More, C., & Walker, S. (2014). What can we do to bring the sparkle back into this child's eyes? Child rights/ community development principles: Key elements for a strengths-based child protection practice. Child Care in Practice, 20, 135–152. doi:10.1080/13575279.2013.847052
   Google Scholar