References

• Act (381) on Children and Parents code (1949).
   Google Scholar
• Act (351) on Genetic Integrity (2006).
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O., Fronek, P., Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2016). ‘This neo-natal ménage à trois’: British media framing of transnational surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34, 15–27. doi:10.1080/02646838.2015.1106454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2015). Views of Swedish commissioning parents relating to the exploitation discourse in using transnational surrogacy. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0126518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. (2011). Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia, 26, 715–741. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmick, N. (2016, June 28). After Nepal, Indian surrogacy clinics move to Cambodia. Aljazeera. Retrieved from http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/06/nepal-indian-surrogacy-clinics-move-cambodia-160614112517994.html
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, L., Carruthers, J., Davaki, K., King, D., Marzo, C., & McCandless, J. (2013). A comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in EU Member States. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/474403/IPOL-JURI_ET(2013)474403_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & van den Akker, O. (2012). The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK – Implications for national and international policy and practice. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34, 267–277. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.750478
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O. (2012). Working at the margins: The views and experiences of court social workers on parental orders work in surrogacy arrangements. Brittish Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockin, S. L. (2013). Growing families in a shrinking world: Legal and ethical challenges in cross-border surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 27, 733–741. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, T. (2010). Cross-border reproductive care: Quality and safety challenges for the regulator. Fertility and Sterility, 94, e20–e22. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekis Ekman, K. (2010). Varat och varan: Prostitution, surrogatmödraskap och den delade människan [ The being and the commodity: Prostitution, surrogate motherhood and the compartmentalized human being]. Stockholm: Leopard förlag.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. (2014, June 26). Totally prohibiting the establishment of a relationship between a father and his biological children born following surrogacy arrangements abroad was in breach of the Convention. Retrieved from http://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiTndObosTJAhVmEHIKHXv5DLQQFgggMAA&url=http3A2F2Fhudoc.echr.coe.int2Fapp2Fconversion2Fpdf2F3Flibrary3DECHR26id3D003-4804617-585490826filename%3D003-4804617-5854908.pdf&usg=AFQjCNG4fs5YuJyYmm4BamhUckcgM3MxPA
   Google Scholar
• Fenton-Glynn, C. (2015). Case commentary the regulation and recognition of the case-law. Child and Family Welfare Quarterly, 27, 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Fronek, P., & Crawshaw, M. (2014). The “new family” as an emerging norm : A commentary on the position of social work in assisted reproduction. Brittish Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, N. (2009). Crossing the line: The legal and ethical problems of foreign surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 19, 151–152. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60064-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondouin, J. (2012). Adoption, surrogacy and Swedish exceptionalism. Critical Race and Whiteness Studies, 8, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. A. (2006). Towards transnational feminisms: Some reflections and concerns in relation to the globalization of reproductive technologies. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 23–38. doi:10.1177/1350506806060004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, B. (2013). Regulation of international surrogacy arrangements: Do we regulate the market, or fix the real problems? Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 36, 501–526.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, A. (2015, March 30). Record numbers of British parents are turning to surrogacy. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/wellbeing/11496662/Record-numbers-of-British-parents-are-turning-to-surrogacy.html
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2012, February 19). Cross border reproductive services. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/cross-border-reproductive-services/
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–225). Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Department. (2013). Committee directive 2013:70 – Utökade möjligheter till behandling av ofrivillig barnlöshet [Enhanced opportunities for treatment of involuntary childlessness]. Retrieved from http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/21/97/28/651b49f2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Krieken, R. (2006). The socio-legal construction of the ‘Best interests of the child’: Law’s autonomy, sociology, and family law. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and sociology (pp. 437–458). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markens, S. (2012). The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 1745–1753. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millbank, J. (2013, August 19). Resolving the dilemma of legal parentage for Australians engaged in international surrogacy. Australian Journal of Family Law, 27. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2312830
   Google Scholar
• Munjal-Shankar, D. (2015). Autonomy, choices and consent in commercial surrogacy: Viewing through the Indian Lens. Asian Bioethics Review, 7, 380–393. doi: 10.1353/asb.2015.0032
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A. (2009). Not an ‘angel’, not a ‘whore’: Surrogates as ‘dirty’ workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16, 141–173. doi:10.1177/097152150901600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permanent Bureau of the Hague. (2012). Conference on private international law. Preliminary report on the issues arising from international surrogacy arrangements. Retrieved from http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/gap2012pd10en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Purewal, S., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2012). Completing the surrogate mother process: Parental order reporters’ attitudes towards surrogacy arrangements, role ambiguity and role conflict. Human Fertility, 15, 94–99. doi:10.3109/14647273.2012.668746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadeer, I. (2009). Social and ethical basis of legislation on surrogacy: Need for debate. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 6, 28–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., & Due, C. (2013). Representations of reproductive citizenship and vulnerability in media reports of offshore surrogacy. Citizenship Studies, 17, 956–969. doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.851145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rotabi, K. S., & Bromfield, N. F. (2012). The decline in intercountry adoptions and new practices of global surrogacy: Global exploitation and human rights concerns. Affilia, 27, 129–141. doi:10.1177/0886109912444102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, S. (2016). Discounted life: The price of global surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanan, S. (2013). An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 8, 10–12. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-8-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. R. (2006). Forensic considerations of surrogacy – an overview. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, 80–85. doi:10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenfield, F., de Mouzon, J., Pennings, G., Ferraretti, P., Andersen, N., de Wert, G., & Goossens, V. (2010). Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 25, 1361–1368. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwell, P. (2015, October 28). India to ban foreign couples paying local surrogates to have their babies. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/11961442/India-to-ban-foreign-couples-paying-local-surrogates-to-have-their-babies.html
   Google Scholar
• Singer, A. (2006/2007). “Mater semper certa est”? Juridisk Tidskrift, 2, 424–431.
   Google Scholar
• SMER. (2013). Report 2013:1: Assisterad befruktning- etiska aspekter [Assisted reproduction – ethical aspects]. Retrieved from http://www.smer.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Smer_rapport_2013_1_webb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smerdon, U. R. (2008). Crossing bodies, crossing borders: International surrogacy between the United States and India. Cumberland Law Review, 39, 15–85.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (2016). 11 Olika vägar till föräldraskap [Different paths to parenthood] (in Swedish) Governmental inquiry. Retrieved March 03, from http://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/e761299bb1a1405380e7e608a47b3656/olika-vagar-till-foraldraskap-sou-201611
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, J. (2013). Surrogacy arrangements and legal parenthood: Swedish law in a comparative context (Diss. Uppsala University, Sweden). Elanders Sverige AB, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Storrow, F. R. (2011). Assisted reproduction on treacherous terrain: The legal hazards of cross-border – reproductive travel. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23, 538–545. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrow, R. F. (2006). Quests for conception: Fertility tourists, globalization and feminist legal theory. Hastings Law Journal, 57, 295–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015). Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: A mixed methods study in New Delhi, India. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 94, 465–472. doi:10.1111/aogs.12576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimmings, K., & Beaumont, P. (2011). International surrogacy arrangements: An urgent need for legal regulation at international level. Journal of Private International Law, 7, 627–647. doi: 10.5235/jpil.v7n3.627
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, W., & Pennings, G. (2011). Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: Should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23, 546–554. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2010). Challenges of medical travel to global regulation: A case study of reproductive travel in Asia. Global Social Policy, 10, 396–415. doi:10.1177/1468018110379981
   Google Scholar
• William-Jones, B. (2002). Commercial surrogacy and the redefinition of motherhood. The Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law, 2, 1–16. Retrieved from http://jpsl.org/archives/commercial-surrogacy-and-redefinition-motherhood/ doi: 10.5840/jpsl2002222
   Google Scholar
• Winther Jørgensen, M., & Phillip, L. (2000). Diskursanalys – som teori och metod [ Discourse analysis as theory and method]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar