The ethics of practical reasoning—exploring the terrain

References

• Aristotle trns. Thomson. (1976). Ethics. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (1995). Ethics and values in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2011). Ethics in an age of austerity: Social work and the evolving New Public Management. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2012). Ethics and values in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S., & Gallagher, A. (2009). Ethics in professional life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1971a). Fieldwork evidence. In Sociological work: Method and substance (pp. 39–62). London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1971b). Whose side are we on? In Sociological work: Method and substance (pp. 123–134). London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Bleakly, A., Bligh, J., & Browne, J. (2011). Medical education for the future: Identity, power, location. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2006). Moral character in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 75–89. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2011). From rules to encounters: Ethical decision-making as a hermeneutic process. Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 115–135. doi: 10.1177/1468017310383003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, W. (2011). Morality, virtue, and aesthetics in Mill’s art of life. In B. Eggleston, D. Miller, & D. Weinstein (Eds.), J. S. Mill and the art of life (pp. 146–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. (1996). The trouble with the researcher – practitioner idea. Social Work Research, 20(2), 113–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 368–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Hardy, M. (2010). Evidence and knowledge for practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 871–896. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedson, E. (2001). Professionalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W. G. (1955). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2008). Providing more effective, ethical services: The philosophy and process of evidence-based (informed) practice. In D. Lindsey & A. Shlonsky (Eds.), Child welfare research: Advances for practice & policy (pp. 51–65). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2011). Evidence based practice and the ethics of discretion. Journal of Social Work, 11(1), 26–48. doi: 10.1177/1468017310381306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1998). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby, J. (2011). Evidence, policy and practice: Critical perspectives in health and social care. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2015). Three in this marriage: An economist’s fascination with a great philosophical love affair. New Statesman, 28 May, 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Juhila, K., Parton, N., & Poso, T. (2003). Constructing clienthood in social work and human services: Interaction, identities and practices. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2012). Engaging with the crooked timber of humanity: Value pluralism and social work. British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 652–668. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (2005). New approaches to ethics for the caring professions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1777/1917). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Kindle Edition. A Public Domain Book.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (Eds.). (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. (1991). Wittgenstein and moral philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1994a). The categorical impreative. In P. Singer (Ed.), Ethics (pp. 274–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1994b). On the supposed right to lie for altruistic motives. In P. Singer (Ed.), Ethics (pp. 280–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louden, R. (1997). On some vices of virtue ethics. In R. Crisp & M. Slote (Eds.), Virtue ethics (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacCormick, N. (2008). Practical reasoning in law and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, D. (2011). Ethical decision-making. In M. Gray & S. Webb (Eds.), Ethics and value perspectives in social work (pp. 41–50). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, D., & Chenoweth, L. (2008). Leave no stone unturned: The inclusive model of ethical decision-making. Ethics and Social Welfare, 2(1), 38–48. doi: 10.1080/17496530801948739
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, S. (2011). Ethical decision-making in situations of self-neglect and squalor among older people. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(1), 52–71. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2011.546179
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1979a). On liberty. In M. Warnock (Ed.), John Stuart Mill utilitarianism (pp. 126–250). London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1979b). Utilitarianism. In M. Warnock (Ed.), John Stuart Mill utilitarianism (pp. 251–321). London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Millgram, E. (2005). Ethics done right: Practical reasoning as a foundation for moral theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R. (1998). The moral philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, O. (1986). The power of example. Philosophy, 61, 5–29. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100019537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, T. (2011). Decision-making in social work (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, J., & Shemmings, D. (2010). Developing research based social work practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2003). Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist “ethics of care”. British Journal of Social Work, 33(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/33.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. C., & Olsson, J. I. (2015). Calling evidence based practice into question: Acknowledging phronetic knowledge. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1581–1597. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. (1970). Social and moral theory in casework. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2010). On the evidence for viruses in social work systems: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 13(4), 465–482. doi: 10.1080/13691450903471211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 177–194. doi: 10.1080/13691450903471229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2014). Making good decisions: Law for social work practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, M. (2006). Social work and social exclusion: The idea of practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2012). Models for professional judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 546–562. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.702310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (Ed.). (2013). Professional decision-making and risk in social work (2nd ed.). London: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practising reflexivity in health and welfare: Making knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, N. (1983). Social work values: An enquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, E. (2014). Aristotle on the frontline. In K. Farnsworth, Z. Irving, & M. Fenger (Eds.), Social policy review 26 – advances in social policy 2014 (pp. 181–200). Social Policy Association. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (1993). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, K. S., Ho, A. P. Y., Hui-Lo, M. C., & Chan, E. A. (2010). Social work ethical decision-making in an inter-disciplinary context. British Journal of Social Work, 40(5), 1573–1590. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar