References

• Anghel, R., & Ramon, S. (2009). Service users and carers’ involvement in SW education: Lessons from an English case study. European Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 185–199. doi: 10.1080/13691450802567416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askheim, O., Beresford, P., & Heule, C. (2016). Mend the gap - strategies for user involvement in social work education. Social Work Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02615479.2016.1248930.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy & Society, 1(2), 95–105. doi: 10.1017/S1474746402000222
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2003). It's our lives: A short theory of knowledge, distance and experience. London: Shaping our Lives.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2010). Supporting people: Towards a person-centred approach. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2016). All our welfare: Towards participatory social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Boxall, K. (2013). Service users, social work education and knowledge for social work practice. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 31, 155–167. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2012.644944
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjeson, B. (2008). Förstå socialt arbete. Liber: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Börjeson, B., Denvall, V., Heule, C., & Kristiansen, A. (2009). Vi och dom. Om att ifrågasätta en gränssättning. Ersta Sköndal högskola arbetsrapportserie nr 64. Stockholm: Ersta Sköndal högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. (2001). No more throwaway people: The co-production Imperative. Washington, DC: Essential Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbrill, C. G. (2010). Power and child protection: The need for a child welfare service users’ union or association. Australian Social Work, 63(2), 194–206. doi: 10.1080/03124071003717655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, R. (1995). Forskningsetik och perspektivval. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J. (2015). Does user co-production of public service delivery increase satisfaction and trust? Evidence from a vignette experiment. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 642–653. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.952825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (1992). Power in social work practice. In Y. I. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 259–275). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heule, C. (2016). Mobiliserande socialt arbete. In V. Denvall, C. Heule, & A. Kristiansen (Eds.), Social mobilisering – en utmaning i socialt arbete (pp. 21–36). Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Heule, C., Knutagård, M., & Swärd, H. (2010). Bostad först – ett innovativt försök. Alkohol & Narkotika, 1, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Heule, C., & Kristiansen, A. (2013). Vem är brukare? Kan en brukare representera andra brukare än sig själv? Socialpolitik nr 1/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Höjlund & Juul. (2005). Anerkendelse og dömmekraft i socialt arbete. Köpenhavn: Hans Rietzels förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2000). Das andere der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, M., & Shirley, T. (2009). Coproduction in public services: A new partnership with citizens. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jungk, R., & Mullert, N. (1987). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London: Institute for Social Inventions.
   Google Scholar
• Knutagård, M. (2009). Skälens fångar. Hemlöshetsarbetets organisering, kategoriseringar och förklaringar (Dissertation). Égalité, Malmö.
   Google Scholar
• Knutagård, M. (2015). Bostad först som strategi eller strategisk strimma. Alkohol & Narkotika, 4, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Knutagård, M., & Kristiansen, A. (2013). Not by the book: The emergence and translation of Housing First in Sweden. European Journal of Homelessness, 7(1), 93–115.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, A. (2005). Flickor i tvångsvård. Utvärdering av tolvstegsinriktad §12-vård. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, A. (2016). Forskning och social mobilisering. In V. Denvall, C. Heule, & A. Kristiansen (Eds.), Social Mobilisering – en utmaning i socialt arbete (pp. 65–76). Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, A., & Heule, C. (2016). Power, experiences and mutual development. Using the concept of gap-mending in social work education. In E. Chiapparini (Ed.), Teaching social work by involving service users: Concepts and evaluations of courses with gap mending approaches in Europe (pp. 37–53). Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, A., Whitehead, M., Canvin, K., & Burström, B. (2010). Controlled and dependent; experiences of living on social assistance in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 142–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00638.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskrosföräldrar (2015). Collapsed parenthood – disqualified Mothers, Lost Fathers and children’s right to their parents. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from http://www.maskrosforaldrar.se/images/10320_rapport_maskros_engelska.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, A., & Sunesson, S. (1998). Frivilliga organisationer, socialt arbete och expertis. Socialvetenskaplig Tidsskrift, 5(2–3), 172–193.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Kinder, T., & Vidal, I. (2015). The service framework: A public-service-dominant approach to sustainable public services. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 424–438. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, D., Henwood, B., & Tsemberis, S. (2016). Housing First: Ending homelessness, transforming systems, and changing lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleace, N., Culhane, D., Granfelt, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). The Finnish homelessness strategy – an international review. Reports of the Ministry of the Environment 3en.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Webber, M. (2012). Models and effectiveness of service user and carer involvement in SW education: A literature review. British Journal of Social Work, 3, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rønning, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). Innovation in social welfare and human services. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, I. (1996). På gränsen till bostad: avvisning, utvisning, specialkontrakt. Lund: Arkiv förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. (2015). Den sekundära bostadsmarknaden. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, L., Ryan-Collins, J., & Boyle, D. (2008). Co-production: A manifesto for growing the core economy. London: New economics foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2000). Beständig ojämlikhet [Durable inequality]. Lund: Arkiv förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tsemberis, S. (2010). Housing First. The pathways model to end homelessness for people with mental illness and addiction. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker, S. (2013). Tales from the sequestered room: Client experiences of social work in Norway and Sweden. Journal of Social Work, 13, 203–220. doi: 10.1177/1468017311412035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar