References

• Andersson Vogel, M. (2012). Secure units and chains of care: Youth, gender, class and ethnicity. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Anell, A., & Mattisson, O. (2009). Collaboration in local government – a knowledge overview. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson, R., & Bihari Axelsson, S.. (2007). Collaboration and public health – concepts, theories and practical application. In R. Axelsson & S. Bihari Axelsson (Red.). Public health and collaboration between professions, organizations and society (pp. 11–32). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Basic, G. (2012). When collaboration becomes a struggle. A sociological analysis of a project in the Swedish juvenile care. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Basic, G. (2013). A case of what? Methodological lessons from a reanalysis of conflicts within Swedish juvenile care. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 2, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Basic, G. (2015a). Successful collaboration. Described and observed experiences of youth care. Malmö: Bokbox förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Basic, G. (2015b). Ethnic monitoring and social control: Descriptions from juveniles in juvenile care institutions. Nordic Social Work Research, 5(1), 20–34. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2014.920273
   Google Scholar
• Basic, G., Thelander, J., & Åkerström, M. (Red.). (2009). A ‘treatment chain’ for young people or the professionals? A process evaluation of the ‘counteract violence and gangs’ – project in Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Institutional Care, Forskningsrapport 5.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1998/2008). Tricks of the trade: Yrkesknep för samhällsvetare. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2000). Service users’ knowledges and social work theory: Conflict or collaboration? The British Journal of Social Work, 30(4), 489–503. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/30.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969/1986). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, A. (2011). Shifting subordination. Co-located interprofessional collaboration between teachers and social workers. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för Socialt Arbete.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 297–306. doi: 10.1093/sw/48.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplow, T. (1968). Two against one. Coalitions in triads. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The “Go-along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15(1), 263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, R. M., & Prendergast, C. G. (1985). The formation of coalitions: Interaction strategies in triads. Sociology of Health & Illness, 2(7), 236–247. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10949087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization. Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fäldt, J., Storbjörk, J., Palm, J., Oscarsson, L., & Stenius, K. (Red.) (2007). Treatment chain. Three evaluation perspective. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Institutional Care, Forskningsrapport 2.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959/1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Government Office, Ministry of Social Affairs. (2006). Assignments to Develop and Test an Enhanced Treatment Chain in Youth Care. Government decision 2006-06-29, nr 2. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., & Barter, K. (1999). Collaboration: A social work practice method. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80(1), 6–13. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajighasemi, Ali. (2008). A evaluation of the ‘contract for life’ – project in Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Institutional Care, SiS följer upp och utvecklar 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1991/1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesjedal, E., Hetland, H., & Iversen, A. C. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration: Self-reported successful collaboration by teachers and social workers in multidisciplinary teams. Child & Family Social Work, 20(4), 437–445. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjortsjö, M. (2006). With cooperation in sight. Concerted efforts and co-located family centers. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983/2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornby, S., & Atkins, J. (2000/1993). Collaborative care. Interprofessional, interagency and interpersonal. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, S. (2011). Law, power and institutional change. A critical analysis of public agencies’ collaboration in barnahus. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The Go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. doi: 10.1177/146613810343007
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, K. (2009). Collaboration. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, S. A., Torres, A., & Norwood, P. (1998). Building partnerships: A successful collaborative experience between social work and education. Children Schools, 20(3), 165–176. doi: 10.1093/cs/20.3.165
   Google Scholar
• Lotia, N. & Hardy, C. (2008). Critical perspectives on collaboration. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith Ring (Red.). The Oxford handbook of interorganizational relations (pp. 366–389). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström, T., Sallnäs, M., & Andersson Vogel, M. (2012). Evaluation of an enhanced care chain of care for young people at an SiS institution. Final report. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Institutional Care, Institutionsvård i fokus 2012: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996/2007). Representing reality. Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, T. C. (1997). Municipal checks and county balances. The referral process for substance abusers in vest-agder. Bergen: Universitetet i Bergen, Institutt for administrasjon og organisasjonsvitenska.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, T. C. (1998). Theories of interorganizational relations in the human services. Social Service Review, 72(3), 285–310. doi: 10.1086/515760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzer, M. (1994). Identity across borders: A study in the “IKEA-world”. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Sevón, G. (1996). Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Red.) Translating organizational change. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1993/2006). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological form of the Group. I. American Journal of Sociology, 8(1), 1–46. doi: 10.1086/211115
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1908/1955). Conflict and The Web Of Group-Affiliations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1950/1964). The Sociology of George Simmel. Translate, editor and introduced by Kurt H. Wolff. New York, NY: Glencoe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, J., Ögren, K., Padyab, M. & Ghazinour, M. (2015). Collaboration patterns among Swedish professionals in the repatriation of unaccompanied asylum-seeking refugee children: An explorative study. European Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1082981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Board of Institutional Care. (2006). The coordinator role in treatment chain project within juvenile care – MVG. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Institutional Care.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Board of Institutional Care. (2009). MVG – treatment chain project within juvenile care. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Institutional Care.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J., Whittington, C., & Leiba, T. (2003). Collaboration in social work practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A., & Godfrey, P. C. (1998). Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Willumsen, E. (2007). Interprofessional collaboration and participation of vulnerable children. In R. Axelsson & S. Bihari Axelsson (Red.). Public health and collaboration between professions, organizations and society (pp. 183–202). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Yakhlef, S., Basic, G., & Åkerström, M. (2015). Protecting European borders: Changing border police cooperation in the Baltic sea area. Social Studies, 9(3), 5–24.
   Google Scholar