616
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Professional judgements and decisions on placement in foster care and reunification in Portugal

Julgamentos e Decisões dos Profissionais sobre a Colocação em Acolhimento Familiar e a Reunificação em Portugal

, , , &

References

  • Arad-Davidson, B., & Benbenishty, R. (2008). The role of worker’s attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers’ assessments and recommendations regarding removal and reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(1), 107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.07.003
  • Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2010). Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social? British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 530–547. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp002
  • Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2011). Identity work and critical social service management: Balancing on a tightrope? British Journal of Social Work, 41(3), 432–448. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq102
  • Baistow, K. (2000). Cross-national research: What can we learn from inter-country comparisons? Social Work in Europe, 7(3), 8–13.
  • Beckstead, J. W. (2003). Attitudes accentuate attributes in social judgment: The combined effects of substance use, depression, and technical incompetence on judgments of professional impairment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(2), 185–201. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598439
  • Bellamy, J. (2008). Behavioral problems following reunification of children in long-term foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(2), 216–228. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.008
  • Benbenishty, R. (1992). An overview of methods to elicit and model expert clinical judgment and decision making. Social Service Review, 66(4), 598–616. doi: 10.1086/603950
  • Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., López, M., Devaney, J., Spratt, T., Koopmans, C., … Hayes, D. (2015). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015
  • Britner, P. A., & Mossler, D. G. (2002). Professionals’ decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26(4), 317–332. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00311-3
  • Carmo, R. (2010). A justiça e o abuso de crianças e jovens. Um caminho em constante construção [The justice and abuse of children and youth. A path in constant construction]. In T. Magalhães (Ed.), Abuso de Crianças da Suspeita ao Crime (pp. 189–203). Lisboa: Lidel.
  • Chapman, G., & Elstein, A. (2000). Cognitive processes and biases in medical decision making. In G. B. Chapman & F. A. Sonnenberg (Eds.), Decision making in health care: Theory, psychology, and applications (pp. 183–210). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Courtney, M. E. (1994). Factors associated with the reunification of foster children with their families. Social Service Review, 68(1), 81–108. doi: 10.1086/604034
  • Davidson-Arad, B., & Benbenishty, R. (2010). Contribution of child protection workers’ attitudes to their risk assessments and intervention recommendations: A study in Israel. Health and Social Care in the Community, 18(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00868.x
  • Davidson-Arad, B., Englechin-Segal, D., & Wozner, Y. (2003). Short-term follow-up of children at risk: Comparison of the quality of life of children removed from home and children remaining at home. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(7), 733–750. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(03)00113-3
  • Delgado, P. (2015). Acolhimento Familiar de Crianças. Pelo direito de crescer numa família [Foster care of children. The right to grow up in a family]. Lousado: Mundos de Vida.
  • Delgado, P., Bertão, A., Timóteo, I. O., Carvalho, J., Sampaio, R., Sousa, A., … Vieira, I. (2013). Acolhimento Familiar de Crianças. Evidências do presente, desafios para o futuro [Children’s foster care: Present evidences and challenges for the future]. Porto: Mais Leituras.
  • Delgado, P., López, M., Carvalho, J., & Del Valle, J. (2015). Acolhimento familiar nos países do Sul da Europa. Uma investigação comparada sobre a satisfação dos acolhedores [Foster care in the European Southern countries. A comparative research about carers’ satisfaction]. Psicologia Reflexão & Crítica, 28(4), 840–849. doi:10.1590/1678-7153.201528423.
  • Del Valle, J., & Bravo, A. (2013). Current trends, figures and challenges in out of home child care: An international comparative analysis. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(3), 251–257. doi: 10.5093/in2013a28
  • Del Valle, J., López, M., Montserrat, C., & Bravo, A. (2009). Twenty years of foster care in Spain: Profiles, patterns and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(8), 847–853. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.03.007
  • Drury-Hudson, J. (1999). Decision making in child protection: The use of theoretical, empirical and procedural knowledge by novices and experts and implications for fieldwork placement. British Journal of Social Work, 29(1), 147–169. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011423
  • Eurochild (2010). Children in alternative care – national surveys. Brussels: Eurochild.
  • Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
  • Evans, T. (2016). Street-level bureaucracy, management and the corrupted world of service. European Journal of Social Work, 19, 602–615. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1084274
  • Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch106
  • Farmer, E. (2009). Reunification with birth families. In G. Schofield & J. Simmonds (Eds.), The child placement handbook (pp. 83–101). London: BAAF.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, J. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Friedson, F. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gambrill, E. D. (2005). Decision making in child welfare: Errors and their context. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 347–352. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.005
  • Gersão, E. (2014). A criança, a família e o Direito [Child, family and Law]. Lisboa: Fundação Manuel Francisco dos Santos.
  • Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child protection systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793358.001.0001
  • Gold, N., Benbenishty, R., & Osmo, J. (2001). A comparative study of risk assessments and recommended interventions in Canada and Israel. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(5), 607–622. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(01)00228-9
  • Greenberg, M., & Smith, R. A. (2016). Support seeking or familial obligation: An investigation of motives for disclosing genetic test results. Health Communication, 31(6), 668–678. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.989384
  • Harries, P., Tomlinson, C., Notley, E., Davies, M., & Gilhooly, K. (2012). Effectiveness of a decision-training aid on referral prioritization capacity: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Decision Making, 32(6), 779–791. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12443418
  • Horwath, J. (2007). Child neglect: Identification and assessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Instituto Segurança Social. (2015). CASA 2014 – Caracterização Anual da Situação de Acolhimento das Crianças e Jovens [Foster care annual characterisation]. Lisboa: Instituto Segurança Social.
  • Kimberlin, S. E., Anthony, E. K., & Austin, M. J. (2009). Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(4), 471–481. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.10.003
  • Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Review, 6(4), 391–409. doi: 10.1177/107808747100600401
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • López, M., Delgado, P., Carvalho, J., & Del Valle, J. F. (2014). Características y desarrollo del acogimiento familiar en dos países con fuerte tradición de acogimiento residencial: España y Portugal [Characteristics and development of foster care in two countries with a strong tradition of residential care: Spain and Portugal]. Universitas Psychologica, 13(3), 15–30. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-3.cdaf
  • Mandel, D. R., Lehman, D. R., & Yuille, J. C. (1995). Reasoning about the removal of a child from home: A comparison of police officers and social workers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(10), 906–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02652.x
  • Martin, L. M., Peters, C., & Glisson, C. (1998). Factors affecting case management recommendations for children entering state custody. Social Service Review, 72(4), 521–544. doi: 10.1086/515777
  • McLeod, A. (2010). Thirty years of listening to children? Adoption & Fostering, 34(3), 67–73. doi: 10.1177/030857591003400312
  • Munro, E. (1996). Avoidable and unavoidable mistakes in child protection work. British Journal of Social Work, 26(6), 793–808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011160
  • Rose, S., & Meezan, W. (1996). Variations in perceptions of child neglect. Child Welfare, 75(2), 139–160.
  • Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Schuerman, J., Rossi, P. H., & Budde, S. (1999). Decisions on placement and family preservation: Agreement and targeting. Evaluation Review, 23(6), 599–618. doi: 10.1177/0193841x9902300602
  • Sinclair, I. (2005). Fostering now. Messages from research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Stensöta, H. O. (2012). Political influence on street-level bureaucratic outcome: Testing the interaction between bureaucratic ideology and local community political orientation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 553–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur062
  • Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgment. British Journal of Social Work, 36(7), 1187–1207. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch345

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.