What’s your agenda? Reflective supervision in community-based child welfare services

References

• Adams, R. (2009). Working with children, young people and families. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and debates (pp. 301–319). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, C. (2011). Supervision is not politically innocent. Australian Social Work, 65, 185–196. doi: 10.1080/0312407x.2011.618544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, M. (2009). Working with communities. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work. Contexts and practice (2nd ed., pp. 345–360). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, D., Charlesworth, S., Turner, D., & O’Neill, L. (2014). Lean social care and worker identity: The role of outcomes, supervision and mission. Critical Social Policy, 34, 433–453. doi: 10.1177/0261018314538799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in ‘the risk society’. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1279–1296. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2011). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65, 197–213. doi: 10.1080/0312407x.2011.591187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2015). Supervision and developing the profession: One supervision or many? China Journal of Social Work, 8, 150–163. doi: 10.1080/17525098.2015.1039173
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L., & Egan, R. (2009). Social work supervision. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice (2nd ed., pp. 410–422). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Webb, C., Bostock, L., & Coomber, C. (2012). Effective supervision in social work and social care. Research Briefing 43. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, L., & McAuliffe, D. (2012). The road to social work and human service practice (3rd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chiller, P., & Crisp, B. (2012). Professional supervision: A workforce retention strategy for social work? Australian Social Work, 65, 232–242. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2011.625036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (2008). Statutory social workers: Stress, job satisfaction, coping, social support and individual differences. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1173–1193. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, M., & Cashmore, J. (2009). Child welfare practice. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice (2nd ed., pp. 275–290). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, V. (2012). Social work supervision practice in Australia: Does the rhetoric match the practice? (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Department of Social Work, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L., LeBeau, M., Kindler, D., Behan, C., Morales, I., & Freundlich, M. (2012). The pivotal role of child welfare supervisors in implementing an agency’s practice model. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1273–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Webb, S. (Eds.). (2013). The new politics of social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, M. D., & Potter, C. C. (2012). The effective child welfare unit supervisor. Administration in Social Work, 36, 409–425. doi: 10.1080/03643107.2011.604403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, H. (2014). Supervision conversations about social justice and social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 349–370. doi: 10.1177/1468017314539082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, H., & O’Donoghue, K. (2009). Culturally relevant, socially just social work supervision: Becoming visible through a social constructionist lens. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18, 70–88. doi: 10.1080/15313200902874979
   Google Scholar
• Hyslop, I. K. (2016). Where to social work in a brave new neoliberal Aotearoa? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28, 5–12. doi: 10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss1id111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvinen-Niinikoski, S. (2004). Social work supervision contributing to innovative knowledge production and open expertise. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social work, critical reflection and the learning organisation (pp. 23–39). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014). Weighing it up: Family maintenance discourses in NGO child protection decision-making in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Child & Family Social Work. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2016). Child protection reform and welfare reform in Aotearoa New Zealand: Two sides of the same coin? In J. Maidment & L. Beddoe (Eds.), Social policy for social work and human services in Aotearoa New Zealand: Diverse perspectives (pp. 237–251). Christchurch: Canterbury University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mor Barak, M. E., Travis, D. J., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83, 3–32. doi: 10.1086/599028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. (2014). About the Vulnerable Children’s Act 2014. Retrieved from http://www.childrensactionplan.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Vulnerable-Children-Act-2014-fact-sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Productivity Commission. (2015). More effective social services. Wellington: New Zealand Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9, 345–358. doi: 10.1177/1468017309334848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. (2011). Social justice: Alive and well (partly) in social work practice? International Social Work, 54, 174–190. doi: 10.1177/0020872810382682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, L., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods. A health focus. Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2010). Working with families. Strengths-based approaches. Wellington: Dunmore.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Daly, B., & Jack, G. (2014). Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: The experiences of a group of child care social workers in England. Child & Family Social Work [ Advance online]. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar