1,004
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Kinship care or upbringing by relatives? The need for ‘new’ understandings in research

Slektsfosterhjem eller oppvekst hos slekt. Behovet for «nye» forståelser i forskning

&

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
  • Andersen, S. H., & Fallesen, P. (2015). Family matters? The effect of kinship care on foster care disruption rates. Child Abuse & Neglect, 48, 68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.005
  • Backe-Hansen, E., Egelund, T., & Havik, T. (2010). Barn og unge i fosterhjem – en kunnskapsstatus. Oslo: NOVA.
  • Bartholet, E. (1999). Nobody’s children: Abuse and neglect, foster drift, and the adoption alternative. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bell, T., & Romano, E. (2015). Permanency and safety among children in foster family and kinship care: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1–19. doi: 10.1177/1524838015611673
  • Berrick, J. D. (1998). When children cannot remain home: Foster family care and kinship care. The Future of Children, 8(1), 72–87. doi: 10.2307/1602629
  • Berrick, J. D., Barth, R. P., & Needell, B. (1994). A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship foster care as family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(1), 33–63. doi: 10.1016/0190-7409(94)90015-9
  • Berrick, J. D., Peckover, S., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(4), 366–378. doi: 10.1177/0958928715594540
  • Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Boaz, A., & Blewett, J. (2010). Providing objective, impartial evidence for decision making and public accountability. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social work research (pp. 37–48). London: Sage.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Broad, B. (2001). Kinship care: The placement choice for children and young people. Lyme Regis: Russell House.
  • Broad, B., Hayes, R., & Rushforth, C. (2001). Kith and Kin: Kinship care for vulnerable young people. London: National Children’s Bureau.
  • Brown, L., & Sen, R. (2014). Improving outcomes for looked after children: A critical analysis of kinship care. Practice: Social Work in Action, 26(3), 161–180. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2014.914163
  • Burgess, C., Rossvoll, F., Wallace, B., & Daniel, B. (2010). ‘It’s just like another home, just another family, so it’s nae different’. Children’s voices in kinship care: A research study about the experience of children in kinship care in scotland. Child & Family Social Work, 15(3), 297–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00671.x
  • Chamberlain, P., Price, J. M., Reid, J. B., Landsverk, J., Fisher, P. A., & Stoolmiller, M. (2006). Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care? Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(4), 409–424. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004
  • Chambers, D. (2012). A sociology of family life. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Cheal, D. (2002). Sociology of family life. London: Palgrave.
  • Cuddeback, G. S. (2004). Kinship family foster care: A methodological and substantive synthesis of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(7), 623–639. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.01.014
  • Dubowitz, H. (1994). Kinship care: Suggestions for future research. Child Welfare, 73(5), 553–564.
  • Egelund, T. (1997). Beskyttelse af barndommen. Socialforvaltningers risikovurdering og indgreb [The protection of childhood: Risk assessment and intervention of child protection services]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  • Egelund, T., Jakobsen, T. B., & Steen, L. (2010). ‘Det er jo min familie!' Beretninger fra børn og unge i slægtspleje [‘But it’s my family!’ Stories from children and youth in kinship care]. Copenhagen: SFI.
  • Flynn, R. (2002). Research review: Kinship foster care. Child & Family Social Work, 7(4), 311–321. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00253.x
  • Font, S. A. (2014). Kinship and nonrelative foster care: The effect of placement type on child well-being. Child Development, 85(5), 2074–2090. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12241
  • Font, S. A. (2015). Is higher placement stability in kinship foster care by virtue or design? Child Abuse & Neglect, 42, 99–111. doi:10.1111/cdev.12241 doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.01.003
  • Frost, N. (2002). A problematic relationship? Evidence and practice in the workplace. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 10(1), 38–50.
  • Gibbs, P., & Müller, U. (2000). Kinship foster care moving to the mainstream: Controversy, policy, and outcomes. Adoption Quarterly, 4(2), 57–87. doi: 10.1300/J145v04n02_04
  • Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gleeson, J. P., & Hairston, C. F. (Eds.). (1999). Kinship care: Improving practice through research. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
  • Gray, M., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2009). Evidence-based social work: A critical stance. New York: Routledge.
  • Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Gullestad, M., & Segalen, M. (Eds.). (1997). Family and kinship in Europe. London: Pinter.
  • Havik, T., & Backe-Hansen, E. (1998). Kunnskapsstatus for fosterhjemsarbeidet [A status of knowledge for foster care practice]. Bergen: NOVA.
  • Hessle, S., & Vinnerljung, B. (1999). Child welfare in Sweden: An overview. Stockholm studies in social work (Vol. 15). Sweden: Stockholm University, Institute of social work.
  • Holtan, A. (2008). Family types and social integration in kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1022–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.01.002
  • Iglehart, A. P. (1994). Kinship foster care: Placement, service, and outcome issues. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(1), 107–122. doi: 10.1016/0190-7409(94)90018-3
  • Kiraly, M., & Humphreys, C. (2013). Family contact for children in kinship care: A literature review. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 358–374. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2013.812129
  • Knudsen, L., & Egelund, T. (2011). Effekter af slægtspleje: slægtsanbragte børn og unges udvikling sammenlignet med plejebørn fra traditionelle plejefamilier [Effects of kinship care: Children and youths development in kinship care compared to non-kinship care]. Copenhagen: SFI.
  • Linderot, S. (2006). Att placera eller inte placera i släktinghem, det är frågan. En studie kring familjehemsplaceringar- lagstiftning, attityder och handläggning inom socialtjänsten [To place or not to place in kinship care, that is the question: A study of foster care placements-legislation, attitudes and administration within the social service] (doctoral dissertation).Lund University, Department of Social Work, Lund.
  • McCarthy, J. R., & Edwards, R. (2011). Key concepts in family studies. London: Sage.
  • Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nixon, P. (2007). Relatively speaking: Developments in research and practice in kinship care. Dartington: Research in practice.
  • O’Brien, V. (2012). The benefits and challenges of kinship care. Child Care in Practice, 18(2), 127–146. doi: 10.1080/13575279.2012.657610
  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family: Socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  • Pease, B. (2010). Challenging the dominant paradigm: Social work research, social justice and social change. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social work research (pp. 98–112). London: Sage.
  • Pierce, W. L. (1999). Kinship care: In national council for adoption. In C. Marshner & W. L. Pierce (Eds.), Adoption factbook III (pp. 104–116). Waite Park, MN: Park Press Quality Printing.
  • Pitcher, D. (1999). When grandparents care. Plymouth: Plymouth City Council Services Department.
  • Sinclair, I., Baker, C., Lee, J., & Gibbs, I. (2007). The pursuit of permanence: A study of the English care system. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family fragments?Cambridge: Routledge.
  • Staunæs, D., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2005). Interview i en tangotid. In M. Järvinen & N. Mik-Meyer (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv (pp. 49–72). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
  • Thørnblad, R. (2012). Slektsfosterhjem: offentlig tiltak i private hjem [Kinship care: public services within private homes] (doctoral dissertation). Tromsø: UiT The Arctic University of Norway: Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences & Education.
  • Thørnblad, R., & Holtan, A. (2011a). Kinship foster children: Actors in their encounter with the child protection system. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 12(3), 307–322. doi: 10.1177/1473325011428187
  • Thørnblad, R., & Holtan, A. (2011b). Oppvekst i slektsfosterhjem: unge voksne fosterbarns familieforståelser [Growing up in kinship foster care: The family understanding of young adult foster children]. Tidsskrift for Ungdomsforskning, 11(1), 49–67.
  • Ulvik, O. S. (2009). Kunnskap for et seinmoderne barnevern: Forholdet mellom forskning og praksis [Knowledge for child welfare in late modern society: The relationship between research and practice]. Tidsskrift for Norges Barnevern, 86(1), 18–27.
  • Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.
  • Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
  • Winokur, M., Holtan, A., & Batchelder, K. E. (2014). Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(1), doi: 10.1002/14651858.pub3
  • Wu, Q., White, K. R., & Coleman, K. L. (2015). Effects of kinship care on behavioral problems by child age: A propensity score analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.020

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.