References

• Ammons, D., & Rivenbark, W. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2009). The demand side of performance measurement: Explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking. International Public Management Journal, 12(1), 24–47. doi: 10.1080/10967490802649395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejerot, E., & Hasselbladh, H. (2011). Professional autonomy and pastoral power: The transformation of quality registers in Swedish health care. Public Administration, 89(4), 1604–1621. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01945.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., … Davey, D. (2010). Performing ‘initial assessment’: Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 352–370. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Calnan, M. (2011). The civilizing process of trust: Developing quality mechanisms which are local, professional-led and thus legitimate. Social Policy & Administration, 45(1), 19–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00751.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J., & Van den Broek, D. (2009). Accountable and countable: Information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1326–1342. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., Marston, G., & Larsen, J. (2010). Unemployed citizen or ‘at risk’ client? Classification systems and employment services in Denmark and Australia. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 384–404. doi: 10.1177/0261018310367674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, K., McDonald, R., & Harrison, S. (2007). Ticking boxes and changing the social world: Data collection and the new UK general practice contract. Social Policy & Administration, 41(7), 693–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. (2010). Performance measurement in adult social care: Looking backwards and forwards. British Journal of Social Work, 40(1), 170–187. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearman, P. (2005). Computerized social casework recording: Autonomy and control in Australia’s income support agency. Labor Studies Journal, 30(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1177/0160449X0503000104
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, J., Declercq, A., & Hermans, K. (2016). Street-level strategies of child welfare social workers in Flanders: The use of electronic client records in practice. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 1249–1265. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dooren, W., & Van de Walle, S. (Eds.). (2008). Performance information in the public sector: How it is used, governance and public management series. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2011). ‘Street-level bureaucracy’ revisited: The changing face of frontline discretion in adult social care in England. Social Policy & Administration, 45(3), 221–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00766.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2009). The use of assessment tools in child protection: An ethnomethodological study. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2013). The development of electronic information systems for the future: Practitioners, ‘embodied structures’ and ‘technologies-in-practice’. British Journal of Social Work, 43(3), 430–445. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2017). Decision-making about the adoption of information technology in social welfare agencies: Some key considerations. European Journal of Social Work, 1–9. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1297773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., & Humphreys, C. (2010). Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools: Observations and reflections from the front line. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2598–2616. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosen, S. (2009). IT, arbejde og køn i anvendelse: Samproduktion i det kvindedominerede administrative arbejde [IT, work and gender in use: Coproduction in female dominated administrative work]. Roskilde: Institut for Miljø, Samfund og Rumlig Forandring [The Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change], Roskilde Universitet [Roskilde University].
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human service organizations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, H., Hvid, H., Grosen, S., & Lambrecht, H. (2009). IT, køn og psykisk arbejdsmiljø [IT, gender and psychological work environment]. Copenhagen: SFI – Det Nationale Forksningscenter for Velfærd.
   Google Scholar
• Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2016). Performance information in human service organizations: Quality and usefulness. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(5), 486–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, I., Ackroyd, S., & Walker, R. (2005). The new managerialism and public service professions: Change in health, social services and housing. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, G. (2006). Employment services in an age of e-government. Information, Communication & Society, 9(1), 83–103. doi: 10.1080/13691180500519555
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2008). The dynamics of performance management. Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D., & Pandey, S. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2006). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? British Journal of Social Work, 38, 253–269. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmer, N., Jacobshagen, N., Meier, L., & Elfering, A. (2007). Occupational stress research: The ‘stress-as-offense-to-self’ perspective. Occupational Health Psychology: European Perspectives on Research, Education and Practice, 2, 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Semmer, N., Tschan, F., Meier, L., Facchin, S., & Jacobshagen, N. (2010). Illegitimate tasks and counterproductive work behavior. Applied Psychology, 59(1), 70–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., … Rafferty, J. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 613–626. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., Peckover, S., Hall, C., & Pithouse, A. (2009). Whither practice-near research in the modernization programme? Policy blunders in children’s services. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(4), 401–411. doi: 10.1080/02650530903374945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Hall, C., & Peckover, S. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1197–1217. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K., & Hall, C. (2010). When policy o’erleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the integrated children’s system. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 405–429. doi: 10.1177/0261018310367675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar